https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 15 07:46:23 2015
New Revision: 231644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231644&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/66688
* tree-cfgcleanup.c (cleanup_co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68907
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
GCC 4.9 warns too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68907
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151214 (experimental) [trunk revision 231607] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 small.c
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:18:1: internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2284
}
^
0x789cf6
preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 6.0.0 20151214 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093
Bug 47093 depends on bug 54663, which changed state.
Bug 54663 Summary: microblaze-linux genchecksum failure: opening
microblaze-c.o: No such file or directory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54663
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54663
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54663
--- Comment #5 from Michael Eager ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> A patch was committed for this PR. Can this PR be closed?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 15, 2015 3:15:13 AM GMT+01:00, law at redhat dot com
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
>
>--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
>I'd say that changing genmat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #4 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Tue Dec 15 05:59:01 2015
New Revision: 231643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-15 Tim Shen
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54663
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #3 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Tue Dec 15 05:19:20 2015
New Revision: 231642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-15 Tim Shen
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #2 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Tue Dec 15 04:50:29 2015
New Revision: 231641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68863
* include/bits/regex_executor.tcc (_Execut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I cannot reproduce the problem with GCC 6, combine takes about 1%
time and little memory. I do not know what changed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68908
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Interestingly, it does emit equally as efficient code as Clang for
__atomic_fetch_add:
void fetch_and_add (AI *ai)
{
__atomic_fetch_add (ai, 1, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
}
i.e.,
fetch_and_add:
sync
.L2
ize increment,.-increment
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20151214 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
Clang 3.8 emits the expected:
increment: # @increment
.Lfunc_begin0:
# BB#0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68907
Bug ID: 68907
Summary: bogus warning: right-hand operand of comma expression
has no effect on an atomic_int preincrement
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Tue Dec 15 03:33:53 2015
New Revision: 231640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/21802 (two-stage name lookup fails for operators)
gcc/cp/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53223
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Tue Dec 15 03:33:53 2015
New Revision: 231640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/21802 (two-stage name lookup fails for operators)
gcc/cp/Cha
version 6.0.0 20151214 (experimental) [trunk revision 231607] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk -c -g -O3 -m32 small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:4:5: error: definition in block 6 does not dominate use in block 7
int fn1() {
^~~
for SSA_NAME: e_14 in statement:
# DEBUG f => e_14
small.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'd say that changing genmatch (or any code) to know about the freelist is a
horrid hack and just papering over the problem.
I haven't put this case under a debugger, but presumably we've got a reference
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Hi Christophe,
Could you paste the output of arm linux when compiling the testcase in cilkplus
effective target with -fcilkplus?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68868
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
A working patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01449.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Oh no! The X constraint allows just everything.
and combine combines everything that is OK for
check_asm_operands. But reg_overlap_mentioned_p
is not expecting anything that complicated.
How about:
Index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68868
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> + __typeof__ (VALUE) __tmp = (VALUE); \
Using typeof like this is incorrect; it results in multiple eval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
Bug ID: 68905
Summary: __is_trivially_copyable returns True for volatile
class types.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66248
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68904
--- Comment #4 from chihin ko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you try:
> -fno-eliminate-unused-debug-types
>
> I bet the full type debug info is going to be emitted in a different TU
> which is why GCC is not emitting it he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68904
--- Comment #3 from chihin ko ---
Created attachment 37033
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37033&action=edit
dwarf dump of test case test.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
234r.ud_dce:
(insn 12 10 13 2 (set (reg:DF 93)
(plus:DF (reg:DF 91 [ xD.1775 ])
(reg:DF 90 [ xD.1777 ]))) t3.c:6 813 {*fop_df_comm_mixed}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DF 91 [ xD.1775 ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68904
--- Comment #2 from chihin ko ---
Created attachment 37032
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37032&action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68904
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you try:
-fno-eliminate-unused-debug-types
I bet the full type debug info is going to be emitted in a different TU which
is why GCC is not emitting it here.
Also look at the debug info inside libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68904
Bug ID: 68904
Summary: DWARF for class ios_base says it's a declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68805
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68903
Bug ID: 68903
Summary: missing default initialization of member when combined
with virtual imheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68902
Bug ID: 68902
Summary: --as-needed consider library as unneeded even when
library have __init functions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68901
Bug ID: 68901
Summary: UBSan triggers false -Wpadded warning
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
URL: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/6aa2bc2bd5ef0e01
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
What a PITA to debug. I'm making some progress here in that I can see a hunk
of memory that doesn't have the expected value. Unfortunately mapping that
back to something done in optimizers is proving diffi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59181
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59181
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68309
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 14 20:54:17 2015
New Revision: 231632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68309
gcc/
* hash-table.h: Add copy constructor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68782
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
On 12/14/2015 01:45 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I think the problem is constexpr.c creates invalid trees, in particular
> CONSTRUCTORs that have non-TREE_CONSTANT elements, yet they have TREE_CONSTA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
A patch has been sent to the patch list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 14, 2015 4:44:13 PM GMT+01:00, "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
>
>--- Comment #13 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>In the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68899
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68900
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> ../../gcc/doc/extend.texi:7452: warning: node `Constraints' is next for
> `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning
> ../../gcc/doc/md.texi:1061: warning: node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68850
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68900
Bug ID: 68900
Summary: extended.texi/md.texi: Texinfo warnings regarding
@node and @menu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46592
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68850
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 14 19:31:51 2015
New Revision: 231631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-14 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/68850
* gfortran.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68882
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68882
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Dec 14 19:29:48 2015
New Revision: 231630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Dump default defs for arguments, static chain and decl-by-refere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58059
Felix Janda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.janda at posteo dot de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
On mainline this is now fixed by the transparent aliases patchset. On release
branches I suggest going with the patch from Comment 4. I am moving back to
Prague right now, Markus, if you can put the testcase i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
Fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01423.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68787
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is in particular problematic for fortran and fopenmp/fopenacc, where the
non-aliasing of parameters arrays in fortran is implemented by annotated those
parameters with restrict in the fortran f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68899
Bug ID: 68899
Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid read of size: 3 occurences in
get_line_width_without_trailing_whitespace
(diagnostic-show-locus.c:413)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or change genmatch so that it stops looking if it sees SSA_NAMEs in free list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68897
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Segher, could you please look at this again before we get into stage4? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68897
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:59:05 2015
New Revision: 231624
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231624&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68833
* common.opt (Wmissing-noreturn): Add Warning o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66688
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37030
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37030&action=edit
gcc6-pr66688.patch
So do you prefer this instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68787
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Thanks; this is visible in full at:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/engine/eng_lib.c#L116
>
> Looking at
> https://github.com/openssl/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:31:26 2015
New Revision: 231622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231622&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 66616] Check for thunks when adding extra constants to clones
2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Jeff, thanks very much for the detailed analysis!
Bill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 37028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37028&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Need to compile with -O2 -m32 -ffast-math options to reproduce. Note that
32-bit and -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Forgot to add stack trace:
Error: dominator of 6 status unknown
t2.f:41:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xb4e62f crash_signal
/export/users/gnutester/stability/svn/trunk/gcc/toplev.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898
Bug ID: 68898
Summary: ICE if rtl if-conversion is off.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68879
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:13:33 2015
New Revision: 231621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix a mistake in cstore_si_as_di (PR68865, PR68879)
convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 14 16:13:33 2015
New Revision: 231621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix a mistake in cstore_si_as_di (PR68865, PR68879)
convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68796
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68897
Bug ID: 68897
Summary: No option to disable just "warning: enumeral and
non-enumeral type in conditional expression"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to alalaw01 from comment #13)
> Hmmm, I realize a "definite" codegen improvement was maybe a bad choice of
> wording. A "substantial" (albeit uncertain!) improvement, may have been more
> accurate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68896
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68896
Bug ID: 68896
Summary: [ARM] target attribute ignored
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
So explicit like
+ /* If the loads and stores can be handled with load/store-lane
+ instructions do not generate this SLP instance. */
+ if (is_a (vinfo)
+ && loads_permuted
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12)
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
> >
> > --- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68895
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #13 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm, I realize a "definite" codegen improvement was maybe a bad choice of
wording. A "substantial" (albeit uncertain!) improvement, may have been more
accurate...
However, yes it looks like we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
>
> --- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> slp-perm-11.c: a 16-iterat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 14 15:33:20 2015
New Revision: 231620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68707
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 14 15:33:20 2015
New Revision: 231620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68707
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
