https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The stack frame is still larger than necessary at least on the -mcpu=cypress
> and -mcpu=leon3 targets. However, the range is similar to GCC 4.3.2, so this
> looks like an old problem.
Yes, it's the init-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910
--- Comment #14 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #13)
> Thanks for reporting the problem.
Thanks for the quick fix.
The stack frame is still larger than necessary at least on the -mcpu=cypress
and -mcpu=leon3 tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Dec 21 04:49:02 2015
New Revision: 231871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64910
* config/i386/i386.md (testqi_ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58109
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-08-09 00:00:00 |2015-12-20
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #24)
> > --- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> >> Yes. If you apply the ugly hack from comment 11, you will find that it
> >> fixes
> >> bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68997
Bug ID: 68997
Summary: [cilkplus] cilk_spawn is broken for functions that
return a type with a custom copy or move constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58117
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67411
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 21 03:04:18 2015
New Revision: 231870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67411
* decl2.c (decl_maybe_constant_var_p): Use DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67411
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 21 03:04:08 2015
New Revision: 231869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67411
* decl2.c (decl_maybe_constant_var_p): Use DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67411
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67411
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 21 01:52:00 2015
New Revision: 231868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67411
* decl2.c (decl_maybe_constant_var_p): A pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68995
--- Comment #3 from TC ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I think TR1 is considered as non-supported now.
>
> Pretty much.
The documentation may need updating if that's the case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68995
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68996
Bug ID: 68996
Summary: Decltype-specifier in declarator-id should not be
accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
--- Comment #6 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Should be a simple matter of doing the _NonNestedTuple checks before other
checks. Patch coming in a couple of days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68995
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think TR1 is considered as non-supported now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67411
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Dec 20 18:38:37 2015
New Revision: 231863
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231863&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67411
* lambda.c (generic_lambda_fn_p): Split out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67411
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Dec 20 18:38:30 2015
New Revision: 231862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67411
* decl2.c (decl_maybe_constant_var_p): A pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64402
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> Yes. If you apply the ugly hack from comment 11, you will find that it fixes
>> both the boehm-gc test suite regressions as well as th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Yes. If you apply the ugly hack from comment 11, you will find that it fixes
> both the boehm-gc test suite regressions as well as those in the libjava test
> suite (which are due to the breakage in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68993
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
28 matches
Mail list logo
