[Bug c++/24375] Wrong line number in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-01-15 21:05:21 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #19) > Is it time to close this one out as fixed? with gcc HEAD 6.0.0 20160127 and the testcase in comment #12, I get: prog.cc: In member function 'voi

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6

[Bug c++/68949] [5/6 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 27 19:18:33 2016 New Revision: 232896 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232896=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/68949 * optimize.c (maybe_clone_body): Clear

[Bug c++/20906] excessive diagnostic messages for missing template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- With a slight change in the parse tree, we get a much better message. prog.cc:3:38: error: wrong number of template arguments (0, should be 1) template void foo::pop(bar<>&, int) {}

[Bug c++/69131] [4.9/5 Regression] default constructor of union incorrectly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69131 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 27 19:18:28 2016 New Revision: 232895 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232895=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69131 * method.c (walk_field_subobs): Add dtor_from_ctor

[Bug c++/62316] poor location for missing braces warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62316 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/69518] [6 Regression] Flag -g causes "error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69518 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/15767] ppc-linux type attribute aligned, packed on vector types behaves wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15767 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-linux-*, | |powerpc-*-elf-*

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 27 18:48:30 2016 New Revision: 232891 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232891=gcc=rev Log: PR lto/69254 * sanitizer.def: Add BEGIN_SANITIZER_BUILTINS and

[Bug preprocessor/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #16 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jan 27 18:57:51 2016 New Revision: 232893 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232893=gcc=rev Log: libcpp: use better locations for _Pragma tokens (preprocessor/69126)

[Bug preprocessor/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/20906] excessive diagnostic messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/20906] excessive diagnostic messages for missing template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20906 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|excessive diagnostic|excessive diagnostic

[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37395 [details] > A provisional patch for the PR > > This fixes the immediate problem. I think some tidying up of unlimited > polymorphism is needed. In any case, I am not in a

[Bug target/68986] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986 --- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jan 27 19:54:03 2016 New Revision: 232901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232901=gcc=rev Log: Don't change stack_alignment_needed for __tls_get_addr __tls_get_addr must

[Bug target/69512] [6 Regression] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) > > Author: hubicka > > Date: Wed Jan 13 23:47:45 2016 > > New Revision: 232356 > > > > URL:

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 20:31:00 2016 New Revision: 232903 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232903=gcc=rev Log: PR c/68062 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op) [EQ_EXPR, GE_EXPR]:

[Bug debug/66869] [6 regression] -Wunused-function no longer warns for static declarations without definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66869 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for C so far, C++ still broken.

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- LTO is creating a clone of reg_save_code, specialized on a particular value of parameter reg. The compiled code contains a badly formed address expression, causing the segfault. Continuing to look.

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Does anyone have a reduced testcase for this? Jakub, where are we modifying the TREE_PURPOSE after creating the METHOD_TYPE?

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > > Actually, I guess checking for this is more of a fit for an uninitialized > > read detector such as

[Bug c/68062] [4.9 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/66869] [6 regression] -Wunused-function no longer warns for static declarations without definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66869 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 27 19:32:49 2016 New Revision: 232899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232899=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/66869 * c-decl.c (c_write_global_declarations_1): Warn

[Bug target/67281] HTM builtins aren't treated as compiler barriers on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67281 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Peter

[Bug c++/24375] Wrong line number in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15) > Does anyone have a reduced testcase for this? I've started delta and creduce, but it is boost, so it will take a while (at 7.6MB so far). > Jakub, where are

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Here is the AST dump. Note the upcase letter in the symtree for the type. We are probably missing an upcase string compare there... Namespace: A-H: (REAL 4) I-N: (INTEGER 4) O-Z: (REAL 4) procedure name =

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #18 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > > > Actually, I guess checking for this is more of a fit for an

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 37495 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37495=edit provisional patch The patch appears to work, but the formatting for the errors looks strange. Consider:

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Jan 27 21:24:01 2016 New Revision: 232904 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232904=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/69385 *

[Bug target/69519] New: STV doesn't use xmm register for DImove move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69519 Bug ID: 69519 Summary: STV doesn't use xmm register for DImove move Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/67407] [6 regression] ice in friend_accessible_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67407 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/66763] [6 Regression] 25_algorithms/remove/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc fails on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/69520] New: Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 Bug ID: 69520 Summary: Implement reversal of -fcheck options Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15) > > Does anyone have a reduced testcase for this? > > I've started delta and creduce, but it is boost, so

[Bug c++/69521] New: -Wdeprecated-declarations errors in unused inline methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69521 Bug ID: 69521 Summary: -Wdeprecated-declarations errors in unused inline methods Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #23 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 37496 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37496=edit Patch to fix the case in comment #12 (for next stage 1)

[Bug target/17381] Unnecessary register move for float extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17381 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #6) > This is not the same. There is a difference between sign extension of > arguments and sign extensions within a function. This bug points out that values

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > I'm testing the proposed patch on x86_64-w64-mingw32 and > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Thanks. The patch is OK for mainline if the above testing is successful.

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/69399] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 27 11:40:04 2016 New Revision: 232869 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232869=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69399 * wide-int.h (wi::lrshift): For larger

[Bug rtl-optimization/69052] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r229402.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #8) > (In reply to amker from comment #7) > > According to discussion at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-01/msg00190.html, > > hook is probably not wanted in

[Bug target/69512] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic, ice-checking| Target|i596

[Bug middle-end/69454] [6 Regression] ix86_expand_prologue internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69454 --- Comment #26 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #25) > Please add -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 to your tests. Otherwise, > you just remove a nop. Here is a test which crashes LRA with the path you proposed. Crash

[Bug bootstrap/69513] LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- This means the DIE in question was created too late or figured unreachable. case dw_val_class_die_ref: if (AT_ref_external (a)) ... else { gcc_assert

[Bug rtl-optimization/69482] Writing through pointers to volatile not always preserved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69482 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, wipedout at yandex dot ru wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69482 > > --- Comment #4 from wipedout at yandex dot ru --- > Okay, suppose we have the

[Bug bootstrap/69506] [6 Regression] check-in 232454 seems to cause problems with cygwin builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69506 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug c/69504] XMM register variable ICE with vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I think at some point the FEs created array-refs here. I think I suggested that elsewhere during last stage1 but nobody implemented that ... (now it's already again quite late). Thus for vector[i] create

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #9) > Created attachment 37484 [details] > proposed patch > > Fixes the test case, in that it prevents the remat. > > Starting overnight bootstraps

[Bug c++/69462] FLT_EVAL_METHOD and DECIMAL_DIG missing in float.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69462 --- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt --- Is this change fit to be posted on gcc-patches? (I have a patch for that anyway and can post it for you if you like.)

[Bug target/69512] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, ice-checking

[Bug c++/65656] __builtin_constant_p should always be constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65656 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/69462] FLT_EVAL_METHOD and DECIMAL_DIG missing in float.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69462 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, but I can't approve changes to that part of GCC and it should probably wait for stage 1.

[Bug tree-optimization/69466] [6 Regression] ICE: Invalid PHI argument after vectorization (on -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69466 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Ok, it doesn't fix it, it somehow just makes -fno-vect-cost-model necessary. We still split the edge, but later in vect_loop_versioning then, so the reason for the bug is still the same - we're looking at

[Bug fortran/69498] ICE on disjunct cases with displaced or incomplete embedded statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69498 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69512] [6 Regression] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/69513] New: LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513 Bug ID: 69513 Summary: LTO bootstrap fails with bootstrap-profiled during linking gnat1 in stagefeedback Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/68782] [6 regression] bad reference member formed with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68782 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69052] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r229402.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052 --- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to amker from comment #7) > According to discussion at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-01/msg00190.html, > hook is probably not wanted in this case. > Bernd gave another proposal by moving combine

[Bug go/69511] New: G.gcstack_size uses uintptr instead of size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69511 Bug ID: 69511 Summary: G.gcstack_size uses uintptr instead of size_t Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug tree-optimization/69466] [6 Regression] ICE: Invalid PHI argument after vectorization (on -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69466 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- I think the fix is wrong, slpeel_duplicate_current_defs_from_edges assumes from->dest and to->dest are the same (or the same kind of) block. Your patch merely papers over the issue that one of the exits

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 37489 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37489=edit proposed patch * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output directives.

[Bug lto/69408] LD crashes with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69408 --- Comment #14 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru --- Created attachment 37487 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37487=edit script to build GCC-avr and other tools use this script to build GCC

[Bug lto/69491] [6 Regression] [CHKP] gcc.dg/lto/chkp-wrap-asm-name ICEs with -fno-use-linker-plugin (verify_cgraph_node failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69491 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/69504] XMM register variable ICE with vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #33 from Nick Clifton --- The patch did receive approval in the end: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02074.html phew! As for 68601 - I guess that we can leave it as RESOLVED for now, and see if the problem

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 --- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt --- The test works now on s390x. Thanks.

[Bug target/69512] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69485] oddity with -Wtabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 --- Comment #12 from Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> --- New numbers for SPARC and PowerPC (rtems4.12-gcc 6.0.0 20160127): sparc-rtems4.11-gcc -c -O2 -o vprintk.4.11.o vprintk.i sparc-rtems4.12-gcc -c -O2 -o vprintk.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Without knowing the lra-remat code at all, I just wonder if subreg_regs needs to be one per the whole function, rather than say per extended basic block or basic block, with the patch any uses in multi-reg

[Bug sanitizer/69508] Undefined Behavior Sanitizer __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value reports invalid load with wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69508 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note that passing the _Bool to varargs function might very well zero extend it (i.e. mask with 1). As kernel is built with -fno-strict-aliasing, I bet trying to print *(char *)_agg_rx->removed instead might

[Bug c/69504] XMM register variable ICE with vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, |

[Bug lto/69408] LD crashes with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69408 --- Comment #15 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru --- steps to repeat: Arduino recent version should be installed GCC created by the above script should be in PATH and in Arduino's /usr/share/arduino/hardware/tools/avr un-tar testcase, cd

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- I'm testing the proposed patch on x86_64-w64-mingw32 and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

[Bug c++/69496] [5/6 Regression] [C++ 14] ICE on VLA in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69496 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 14:26:38 2016 New Revision: 232875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232875=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69496 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): Evaluate

[Bug c++/69496] [5/6 Regression] [C++ 14] ICE on VLA in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69496 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel due to (invalid?) peeking at alignments in function_arg.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/69450] [6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/include/math.h:66:1 2: error: 'constexpr bool std::isnan(double)' conflicts with a previous declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69450 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/69032] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in cfg_preds_1, at sel-sched-ir.c:4809 with -fsched-pressure -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69032 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev --- Created attachment 37490 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37490=edit proposed patch We fail to find the proper seqno for the fresh bookkeeping copy here. The problem is that in

[Bug fortran/69268] [5 Regression] Sourced allocation calls function twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69268 --- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Wed Jan 27 14:48:04 2016 New Revision: 232876 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232876=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-01-27 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Is there any practical difference between brace-init-list: constexpr closure() : member{} { } and expression-list: constexpr closure() : member() { } ?

[Bug tree-optimization/69466] [6 Regression] ICE: Invalid PHI argument after vectorization (on -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69466 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- I'll have a look as well.

[Bug sanitizer/69508] Undefined Behavior Sanitizer __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value reports invalid load with wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69508 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69494] Optimizer eliminates assignment to volatile subobject

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69504] XMM register variable ICE with vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69512] New: ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 Bug ID: 69512 Summary: ICE when using avx with i586 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug sanitizer/69508] Undefined Behavior Sanitizer __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value reports invalid load with wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69508 Chris Bainbridge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69462] FLT_EVAL_METHOD and DECIMAL_DIG missing in float.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69462 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|stack overflow detected |FLT_EVAL_METHOD and |

[Bug c++/60336] empty struct value is passed differently in C and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336 --- Comment #45 from H.J. Lu --- I opened a clang bug: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26337 I propose the following definitions: i. An empty record is: 1. A class without member. Or 2. An array of empty records. Or 3. A

[Bug libstdc++/69295] [6 Regression] New special math function failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69295 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- On big-endian ppc64 ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_value.cc these tests fail: data167, toler167 on line 11579 max_abs_frac = 4.82864e-13 data171, toler171 on line 11579 max_abs_frac = 5.15741e-12

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems like powerpc* has lots of other issues related to mixing pic and non-pic code. E.g. int x; int foo (void) { return x; } __attribute__((optimize ("PIC"))) int bar (void) { return x; } seems to

<    1   2   3   >