https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50971
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #15 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9)
> I built the x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0 cross-compiler to better understand
> what the problem is but I don't see it. The cross compiler says the size
> and alignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Sadov ---
I just reproduced that in 4.9.3, but the error is a little different
[error]
error: no matching function for call to ‘f(int, int&, lots of int&, int&,
double&)’
note: candidates are:
note: template void f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39714
Bug 39714 depends on bug 39723, which changed state.
Bug 39723 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with long long
shifts on v850
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'd agree it's too invasive to backport -- both changes are new optimizations
and there may well have been follow-up patches for both. The potential for
destabilizing the release branches would seem to out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #14 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> Patch posted for review:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02372.html
For your original patch, my test result is below (only compare 5 result files,
be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yes, the patch is meant to disbale streaming of instrumentation thunks, so we
do not output two function bodies for one assembler name into LTO files. Can we
possibly just fix the conditional instead of fully r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69491
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69630
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Uhm, a fallout from the patch allowing cxa_pure_virtual in the list of possible
targets.
Index: ipa-devirt.c
===
--- ipa-devirt.c(revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
I will implement the optimization soon (with transparent aliases it is finally
not too hard to do), but the patch will not be backporable to gcc 5 and for
years it was possible to output weakref and its defini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > The patch simply prohibits references to all COMDAT and EXTERN methods and
> > vtables of types with visibility attributes which will prevent optimizing of
> > many inlines i.e. in libstdc++.
>
> Hmm? Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
So it is. Thanks for the correction. The trouble is that while saying this
little may be sufficient for builtins that correspond to functions fully
specified elsewhere (e.g., in the C standard) it's inadequa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69747
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #30 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Something like this maybe? I don't know much about the machine and can't say
whether the earlyclobber is justified, but looking at my dumps this appears to
prevent the problematic peephole from triggering. N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
Paul Eggert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69694
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
Bug ID: 69763
Summary: _Alignof(double) in C gives different results from
alignof(double) in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Wrong config.log. I want the one under libstdc++-v3 directory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
--- Comment #2 from John ---
After reporting the bug, I noticed that in the actual code I have (not the
reduced version I posted before), adding the (:) stride doesn't always make the
ICE go away.
What solved the problem once and for all (and wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC locales need some libc support and the hookup for libstdc++ to libc uses
some glibc extensions due to needing threaded support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
Bug ID: 69762
Summary: Locales are not fully supported on
x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is documented, just not the way you think it is:
See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html:
Outside strict ISO C mode (-ansi, -std=c90, -std=c99 or -std=c11), the
functions _exit, +++alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks for tracking this down Jeff.
This seems too invasive to backport to the release branches, or is this
compile-time regression considered important enough for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34723
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69761
Bug ID: 69761
Summary: collect2 cannot find ld when built with in-tree
binutils on Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef struct { float r, g, b; } t_rgb;
void write_xpm(void *out, unsigned int flags, const char *title,
const char *legend, const char *label_x, const char *label_y,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #2 from Edd Barrett ---
Created attachment 37660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37660&action=edit
config.log
Attached is the config.log without adjusting CFLAGS and without using
--with-pic.
FWIW, OpenBSD has b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Bug ID: 69760
Summary: Wrong 64-bit memory address caused by an unneeded
overflowing 32-bit integer multiplication on x86_64
under -O2 and -O3 code optimization
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
--- Comment #6 from Moritz Klammler ---
I'm sorry, the attachment was meant for this other issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
I don't know how this could happen but apparently, I hit some wrong button and
posted it to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
Bug ID: 69759
Summary: __builtin_alloca undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
--- Comment #5 from Moritz Klammler ---
Created attachment 37659
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37659&action=edit
Improved version of download_prerequisites script that verifies package
checksums
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Bug ID: 69758
Summary: [6 Regression] Plugins can't include params.h (missing
params.list)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
Moritz Klammler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moritz at klammler dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
Moritz Klammler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moritz at klammler dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the config.log ? It might be that PIE needs to enabled by
default instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Feb 10 21:19:17 2016
New Revision: 233308
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233308&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
a branch to work on pr 66337
Added:
branches/ibm/kelvin-6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68255
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e29253 at jp dot ibm.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
Bug ID: 69757
Summary: OpenBSD requires -fPIC to build.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68420
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66368
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37657&action=edit
gcc6-pr68672-wip.patch
WIP patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-02-10 1:45 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Gah. Try this one instead.
I fixed this up after I sent last mail and restarted build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
Bug ID: 69756
Summary: Passing a multidimensional variable-length array into
a lambda (by reference) causes a segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Does the patch let the test pass on x86_64-apple-darwin15,
> both with -m32 and -m64?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Nick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |critical
--- Comment #2 from Nick ---
Note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:36:19 2016
New Revision: 233306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:35:35 2016
New Revision: 233305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:12:32 2016
New Revision: 233304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233304&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
Thanks for the update. That is what I would expect as well. But removing the
"{ target { ! { ia32 } } }" directives without doing anything for targets wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69754
Bug ID: 69754
Summary: --print-{file,prog}-name don't work for
liblto_plugin.so
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE |[4.9 Regression] ICE
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 5.4+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] all pch |[4.9 Regression] all pch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE in |[4.9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 5.4+/6+ so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on |[4.9 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68960
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66904
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:46:38 2016
New Revision: 233302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37649|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:44:52 2016
New Revision: 233301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-04 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69546
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:44:07 2016
New Revision: 233300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:42:34 2016
New Revision: 233298
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233298&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:43:01 2016
New Revision: 233299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:41:37 2016
New Revision: 233297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:40:54 2016
New Revision: 233296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Stefan Sørensen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:40:54 2016
New Revision: 233296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Stefan Sørensen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:38:42 2016
New Revision: 233295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:36:53 2016
New Revision: 233294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:34:30 2016
New Revision: 233293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #29 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Mike, this isn't about addresses. It's about an earlyclobber output overlapping
an input. Maybe there's an invalid peephole creating such a pattern, or maybe
the output need not be marked earlyclobber - that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:34:30 2016
New Revision: 233293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:32:37 2016
New Revision: 233292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233292&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-14 Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
