[Bug rtl-optimization/69771] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/67278] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed on darwin 14.5 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69777] Give a warning when virtual function is devirtualized into a __cxa_pure_virtual call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug middle-end/67278] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed on darwin 14.5 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.4

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #14 from Kirill Yukhin --- Okay, I've tried: 1. Run AVX-512 testing on Spec2006 and see no impact of the one-liner: Geomeans: INT : 5.11 5.11+0.05% FP : 2.73 2.73-0.08% ALL : 3.54 3.54

[Bug target/52991] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 m.facchin at arduino dot cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.facchin at arduino dot cc

[Bug middle-end/69715] [4.9 regression] ICE: in store_bit_field_1, at expmed.c:839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/69774] Corrupted 'this' passed through lambda.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69774 Guille changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69773] gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "assign_by_spills"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69773 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Target|

[Bug c++/68645] [6 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68645 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/68158] Function attributes parsed incorrectly in C++ (while -fcilkplus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68158 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

PIE/PIC issue ...w.r.t linker variable

Hi Guys , we do have a issue with below code ,When we enabled the pie (-fpie/pie) option i.e main.c extern int *my_ptr ; int main() { return *my_ptr; } foo.s .syntax unified .cpu cortex-m0 .fpu softvfp .thumb .global my_ptr .global my_var .data .align 2 .type

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that this has gone latent on trunk with r233267

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] New: [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 Bug ID: 69783 Summary: [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/68672] [4.9/5 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/54430] [C++11] For-Loop: Scope of iterating variable begins too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oszi at inf dot u-szeged.hu ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- extern void *malloc (__SIZE_TYPE__); extern void abort (void); void __attribute__((noinline,noclone)) foo (int *pi) { if (*pi != 1) abort (); } int main() { void *p = malloc(sizeof (double));

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- The fix is easy in this case, just #include after the macro definition. luminance-hdr-2.3.0/src/HdrCreation/robertson02.cpp From 30 #include "arch/math.h"

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/69729] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/69729] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri Feb 12 13:17:28 2016 New Revision: 233376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233376=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/69729 * lto-streamer-out.c (lto_output): Use

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, my preference is to back out the cse.c one-liner for GCC 6.

[Bug libstdc++/69782] New: [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 Bug ID: 69782 Summary: [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 37671 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37671=edit test-case to reproduce It needs to be compiled with -Ofast -funroll-loops on x86-64

[Bug ipa/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 12 11:57:54 2016 New Revision: 233374 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233374=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/68672 * ipa-split.c (split_function): Don't compute/use

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel due to (invalid?) peeking at alignments in function_arg.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #30 from Hector Oron --- (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #28) > (In reply to Hector Oron from comment #27) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25) > > > Re-adding GCC 6 as regression, though graphviz is not gsoap. >

[Bug c++/69784] New: Range-based for loop can

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69784 Bug ID: 69784 Summary: Range-based for loop can Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/69784] Range-based for loop can't handle same variable name in range declaration and in range expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69784 --- Comment #3 from Csaba Osztrogonác --- In WebKit project we had to submitted at least 2 workarounds due to this bug: - https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151622 - https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154162 ( side note: clang builds

[Bug c++/69784] Range-based for loop can't handle same variable name in range declaration and in range expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69784 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.7 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69753] [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/43434] Missed vectorization: "not vectorized: data ref analysis": pointer incremented by a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43434 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Now that strided SLP is implemented we run into t.c:10:3: note: versioning for alias required: can't determine dependence between *s1_82 and MEM[(DCTELEM *)block_81 clique 1 base 1] t.c:10:3: note: mark

[Bug c++/69784] Range-based for loop can't handle same variable name in range declaration and in range expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69784 --- Comment #2 from Csaba Osztrogonác --- If we explicitly add the type of element, we get a different error: main.cpp:10:18: error: ‘begin’ was not declared in this scope for (int i : i) ^ main.cpp:10:18: note: suggested

[Bug middle-end/69729] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Well, using thunk.add_pointer_bounds_args to determine intrumentation thunks in this condition works fine for me. Let's change the condition then.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69771] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69764] [5/6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in decompose, at rtl.h:2107)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 69771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 12 11:59:00 2016 New Revision: 233375 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233375=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/69241 * ipa-split.c (split_function): If split part returns

[Bug c++/69784] Range-based for loop can't handle same variable name in range declaration and in range expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69784 Csaba Osztrogonác changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Range-based for loop can|Range-based for loop can't

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Similar thing can be observed in PR69732.

[Bug tree-optimization/69574] [4.9 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in hide_evolution_in_other_loops_than_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69574 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 12 14:04:29 2016 New Revision: 233378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233378=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-12 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/69579] [4.9 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 and __sigsetjmp with “tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in compute_optimized_partition_bases”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69579 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 12 14:04:29 2016 New Revision: 233378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233378=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-12 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/69715] [4.9 regression] ICE: in store_bit_field_1, at expmed.c:839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 12 14:04:29 2016 New Revision: 233378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233378=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-12 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Kamil Dudka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kdudka at redhat dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/69753] [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4) > Is this actually bogus? > > [over.call.func] says: > > If the keyword this (9.3.2) is in scope and refers to class T, or a derived > class of T, then the

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/69786] [6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c++/loop-11.C (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69786 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69753] [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/69785] New: c++filt can't demangle string or compiler produce wrong mangled string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69785 Bug ID: 69785 Summary: c++filt can't demangle string or compiler produce wrong mangled string Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/69715] [4.9 regression] ICE: in store_bit_field_1, at expmed.c:839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69715 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69574] [4.9 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in hide_evolution_in_other_loops_than_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69574 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69579] [4.9 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 and __sigsetjmp with “tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in compute_optimized_partition_bases”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/69786] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c++/loop-11.C (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69786 Bug ID: 69786 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c++/loop-11.C (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00881.html

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Yeah, my preference is to back out the cse.c one-liner for GCC 6. IMO the cse.c patch is the correct fix for the code quality regression seen on

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 37672 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37672=edit patch

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Ok, I have a local patch in my tree waiting for an excuse to check in that does t.c:18:8: note: improved number of alias checks from 50 to 2

[Bug debug/69785] c++filt can't demangle string or compiler produce wrong mangled string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69785 --- Comment #1 from Nikolay Piskun --- I can send a test program, but its rather long.

[Bug c++/64611] Using a << operator inside an overloaded << operator gives compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64611 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/69780] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on __builtin_alloca_with_align with small alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69780 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/69779] [6 Regression] Invalid free in driver::finalize on s390x running libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69779 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/69771] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/69771] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 12 16:49:44 2016 New Revision: 233381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233381=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69764 PR rtl-optimization/69771 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/69764] [5/6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in decompose, at rtl.h:2107)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 12 16:49:44 2016 New Revision: 233381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233381=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69764 PR rtl-optimization/69771 *

[Bug sanitizer/68580] FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37675 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37675=edit tentative patch

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug rtl-optimization/69764] [5 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in decompose, at rtl.h:2107)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE on |[5 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/69787] New: class only emitted as declaration in DWARF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69787 Bug ID: 69787 Summary: class only emitted as declaration in DWARF Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug sanitizer/68580] FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580 --- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- I managed to trigger the test returning 0 from the command line, by running it in parallel: ... $ ( export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd -P)/install/lib64; for cnt in $(seq 1 400); do (./a.out ; echo $? )

[Bug c++/69787] class only emitted as declaration in DWARF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69787 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |5.3.1 --- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey ---

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #16) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > Yeah, my preference is to back out the cse.c one-liner for GCC 6. > > IMO the cse.c patch is the correct fix for

[Bug tree-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #22 from Bernd Schmidt --- Created attachment 37674 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37674=edit Candidate testsuite addition Here's a reduced version of the testcase. Could you verify that it passes on PA (after

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > That doesn't help for std::numeric_limits::min() Martin corrected me, (numeric_limits::min)() will work.

[Bug driver/69779] [6 Regression] Invalid free in driver::finalize on s390x running libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69779 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Feb 12 18:37:35 2016 New Revision: 233385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233385=gcc=rev Log: PR driver/69779: fix bogus cleanup code used by libgccjit affecting s390x

[Bug driver/69265] Option suggestion provides a wrong hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm

[Bug rtl-optimization/69567] PowerPC64: cstore optimisation produces bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Feb 12 18:32:21 2016 New Revision: 233384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233384=gcc=rev Log: combine: More distribute_notes trouble (PR69737) PR64682 is a problem in

[Bug rtl-optimization/64682] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Feb 12 18:32:21 2016 New Revision: 233384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233384=gcc=rev Log: combine: More distribute_notes trouble (PR69737) PR64682 is a problem in

[Bug rtl-optimization/69737] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Feb 12 18:32:21 2016 New Revision: 233384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233384=gcc=rev Log: combine: More distribute_notes trouble (PR69737) PR64682 is a problem in

[Bug driver/69265] Option suggestion provides a wrong hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Feb 12 17:39:27 2016 New Revision: 233382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233382=gcc=rev Log: PR driver/69265 and 69453: improved suggestions for various misspelled options

[Bug driver/69453] unrecognized command line option suggestions should take negation into account

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69453 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Feb 12 17:39:27 2016 New Revision: 233382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233382=gcc=rev Log: PR driver/69265 and 69453: improved suggestions for various misspelled options

[Bug driver/69453] unrecognized command line option suggestions should take negation into account

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69453 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > it can be less than trivial. A fairly easy way to avoid having to deal with > the problem in libstdc++ is to enclose every call to min and max in public >

[Bug other/69554] [6 Regression] Multi-location diagnostics writes too many lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69554 --- Comment #18 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Feb 12 19:18:03 2016 New Revision: 233386 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233386=gcc=rev Log: PR other/69554: avoid excessive source printing for widely-separated locations

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Bug 60526 depends on bug 69554, which changed state. Bug 69554 Summary: [6 Regression] Multi-location diagnostics writes too many lines https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69554 What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/69554] [6 Regression] Multi-location diagnostics writes too many lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69554 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/69779] [6 Regression] Invalid free in driver::finalize on s390x running libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69779 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69668] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Error reading namelist opened with DELIM='NONE'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69668 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Feb 12 19:52:13 2016 New Revision: 233387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233387=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-12 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug libfortran/69788] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788 Bug ID: 69788 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/69798] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in c_parser_braced_init, at c/c-parser.c:4338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug tree-optimization/69801] New: gcc ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "operand_equal_p"

efix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160212 (experimental) [trunk revision 233377] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk abc.c -c abc.c: In function 'fn1': abc.c:5:1: internal compiler error: in operand_equal_p, at fold-co

[Bug tree-optimization/69802] New: gcc ICE at -O1 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

--prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160212 (experimental) [trunk revision 233377] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk abc.c -c -O3 abc.c: In function 'fn1': abc.c:5:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Bug target/67260] [sh] Register spill bug for sibcall+complex+softfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260 --- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17) > > > I guess because the recently added "sibcall_value_pcrel_fdpic" pattern also > uses "=k" as the clobber constraint, it might run into the same problem. To > play

[Bug target/69789] g++ -O2 is removing tests against a variable that can be changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69789 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This works in GCC 6 on aarch64 as far as I can tell.

[Bug target/67260] [sh] Register spill bug for sibcall+complex+softfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260 --- Comment #22 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #21) > > It seems the patch is not good. I see new failures when testing on sh-elf. > I will try to see what's going on there. False alarm. Those were other unrelated

[Bug fortran/69668] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Error reading namelist opened with DELIM='NONE'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69668 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Feb 12 21:02:02 2016 New Revision: 233388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233388=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-12 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug bootstrap/69790] New: LTO compiling GCC does not work (lib/bfd-plugin path has unclear location)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69790 Bug ID: 69790 Summary: LTO compiling GCC does not work (lib/bfd-plugin path has unclear location) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/69737] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64682.c -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/69792] New: spurious warning for UDL declaration with parenthesized literal-operator-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69792 Bug ID: 69792 Summary: spurious warning for UDL declaration with parenthesized literal-operator-id Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

  1   2   >