[Bug c/70090] New: add non-constant variant of __builtin_object_size for _FORTIFY_SOURCE and -fsanitize=object-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090 Bug ID: 70090 Summary: add non-constant variant of __builtin_object_size for _FORTIFY_SOURCE and -fsanitize=object-size Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/45076] [OOP] gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_6.f03 ICEs with -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This PR seems fixed for 4.9.3, 5.3.0, and trunk (6.0). The change occurred > between revisions r201916 (2013-08-22, broken) and r202111 (2013-08-30). > Could someone checks that the PR is actually fi

[Bug c++/70091] New: Codegen emits dead load on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70091 Bug ID: 70091 Summary: Codegen emits dead load on x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/70092] New: Enhance -Wunused-but-set-parameter when the parameter is also read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70092 Bug ID: 70092 Summary: Enhance -Wunused-but-set-parameter when the parameter is also read Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/70093] New: Instancing function with VM type cases internal compiler error in 'assign_stack_temp_for_type'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70093 Bug ID: 70093 Summary: Instancing function with VM type cases internal compiler error in 'assign_stack_temp_for_type'. Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/70093] Instancing function with VM return type cases internal compiler error in 'assign_stack_temp_for_type'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70093 --- Comment #1 from sasho648 at gmail dot com --- As a comment - I'll add that this feature looks fascinating and my personal opinion is that code like this should be allowed. I even suggest a way of allowing the return VM type access to the func

[Bug c/70089] ARM/THUMB unnecessarily typecasts some rvalues on memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70089 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/70088] New: ARM/THUMB unnecessarily typecasts some rvalues on memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70088 Bug ID: 70088 Summary: ARM/THUMB unnecessarily typecasts some rvalues on memory store Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c/70089] ARM/THUMB unnecessarily typecasts some rvalues on memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70089 --- Comment #2 from aik at aol dot com.au --- Oh, darn. Sorry - the page had timed out on me the first time and I thought it hadn't gone through. The first attempt at the post actually lacked some information and I had included the wrong attachme

[Bug c++/70094] New: Missed optimization when passing a constant struct argument by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70094 Bug ID: 70094 Summary: Missed optimization when passing a constant struct argument by value Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69874] Program crashes when an exception is thrown to second base class reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69874 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/68184] [4.9 Regression] Exception from a virtual function does not get caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maysam.kind at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/69874] Program crashes when an exception is thrown to second base class reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69874 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/33430] Improve -finit-*: Initialization of derived types, equivalenced variables, allocated arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33430 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fritzoreese at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/32317] [bounds checking] No warning on bad arguments with explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32317 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/27766] [meta-bug] -fbounds-check related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766 Bug 27766 depends on bug 32317, which changed state. Bug 32317 Summary: [bounds checking] No warning on bad arguments with explicit interface https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32317 What|Removed |Add

[Bug c++/70095] New: [C++14] Link error on partially specialized variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70095 Bug ID: 70095 Summary: [C++14] Link error on partially specialized variable template Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug rtl-optimization/70061] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in delete_insn_chain() with unused label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70061 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson --- Created attachment 37875 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37875&action=edit proposed patch Thanks, Jeff, the errant stack adjustment was a good hint. The problem is that we are emitt

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #12 from Louis Dionne --- The following code still fails to compile on GCC trunk: template struct tuple { Xn storage_; constexpr tuple(Xn const& xn) : storage_(xn) { } template

[Bug c/70093] Instancing function with VM return type cases internal compiler error in 'assign_stack_temp_for_type'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70093 --- Comment #2 from sasho648 at gmail dot com --- The bug occurs at the most simple 'gcc test_code.c' command.

[Bug c++/70096] New: [Invalid codegen] Read of uninitialized value in ref-qualified pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096 Bug ID: 70096 Summary: [Invalid codegen] Read of uninitialized value in ref-qualified pointer to member function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c++/70097] New: Cannot assign ref-qualified non-static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70097 Bug ID: 70097 Summary: Cannot assign ref-qualified non-static member function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/70079] missed constant propagation in memcpy expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70079 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/70098] New: PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE in reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 Bug ID: 70098 Summary: PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE in reload Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/70098] PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE in reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 --- Comment #1 from Anton Blanchard --- Created attachment 37876 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37876&action=edit Test case

[Bug c++/70099] New: Function found by ADL, but shouldn't be visible at point of definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70099 Bug ID: 70099 Summary: Function found by ADL, but shouldn't be visible at point of definition Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70096] [6 Regression] [Invalid codegen] Read of uninitialized value in ref-qualified pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug fortran/70058] Segmentation fault when open file with existing file and status = "UNKNOWN"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4) > > The problem does not exist on Linux for sure. Not sure if this is a TDM > > distribution problem, a Windows problem, a Mi

[Bug c++/70099] Function found by ADL, but shouldn't be visible at point of definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70099 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70100] New: internal compiler error: in execute, at cfgexpand.c:6066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70100 Bug ID: 70100 Summary: internal compiler error: in execute, at cfgexpand.c:6066 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priori

[Bug translation/60149] Message with percent character incorrectly marked c-format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60149 Göran Uddeborg changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70079] missed constant propagation in memcpy expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70079 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini --- Yes, until combine there is the equivalent of addl$512, %ecx;; 4 andl$-8, %ecx ;; 4.5 shrl$3, %ecx ;; 5 and combine is ab

[Bug c++/70092] Enhance -Wunused-but-set-parameter when the parameter is also read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70092 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #13 from Louis Dionne --- Actually, the problem is much worse than I thought. It turns out that with -O1, the following code does not pass the assertion: #include template struct tuple { Xn storage_; c

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hadrien-gcc at psydk dot org --- C

[Bug fortran/70058] Segmentation fault when open file with existing file and status = "UNKNOWN"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4) > > > The problem does not exist on Linux for sure. Not sure if thi

[Bug libstdc++/70101] New: Allocator-extended priority_queue constructors are badly broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70101 Bug ID: 70101 Summary: Allocator-extended priority_queue constructors are badly broken Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/70102] New: Tree re-association prevents SLP vectorization at -Ofast.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70102 Bug ID: 70102 Summary: Tree re-association prevents SLP vectorization at -Ofast. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 6 06:47:22 2016 New Revision: 234013 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234013&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67364 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): R

[Bug target/70098] PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE in reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70098] PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE in reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- That pseudo 156 is assigned a floating point reg (33, i.e. f1) by IRA. That won't end well; this is a jump_insn so is required to work without reloads.

[Bug target/70098] PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE in reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug tree-optimization/70103] New: gcc reports bad dependence and bails out of vectorization for one of the bwaves loops.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70103 Bug ID: 70103 Summary: gcc reports bad dependence and bails out of vectorization for one of the bwaves loops. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug tree-optimization/70103] gcc reports bad dependence and bails out of vectorization for one of the bwaves loops.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70103 vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse dot de,