https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70233
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6)
> The failures I looked at were becasue the constructors were using strings of
> different sizes. So my question was going to be what are the rules. Are the
> stri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70295
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70278
Bug ID: 70278
Summary: LRA ICE on trunk for ARM Thumb1 with Os
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70318
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70307
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 38035
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38035&action=edit
reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01099.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70078
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70139
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced testcase from 70145
namespace std /* simplified std::pair from */
{
template
struct pair
{
typedef _T1 first_type;
typedef _T2 second_type;
_T1 first;
_T2 second
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68536
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70269
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #3)
> trunk stage 4/ branch 5 approved:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00975.html
Bootstrap and regtest succeeded.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232
--- Comment #12 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 37991
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37991&action=edit
simpler test case without manual byte swap
For reference, I have sent a patch to the kernel to replace the ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70269
Bug ID: 70269
Summary: [5/6 Regression] ICE with -fdump-ipa-pta-graph
-fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #6 from hongxu jia ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, hongxu.jia at windriver dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
> >
> > --- Comment #3 from hongxu jia --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #27)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #26)
> > I just fail to understand why we cannot just clobber the whole
> > object once in the in-charge constructor,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Note that VRP figures out that
_15 = n_18 + 4294967295;
Found new range for _15: [0, 4294967294]
(so no underflow)
_2 = (sizetype) _15;
Found new range for _2: [0, 4294967294]
_1 = _2 + 1;
Found new range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70277
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70139
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Viktor Ostashevskyi from comment #14)
> What about at least documenting that -fno-ellide-constructor is broken in
> GCC 5.[123] and GCC6 if it isn't get fixed till release?
N.B. it's "elide"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70293
Bug ID: 70293
Summary: [ICE, AVX-512] Wrong reg constraints in vec_dup
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #38 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
I guess this 'meta-bugreport' have become lightly fuzzy with all kinds of CSiBE
code size increase issues,
so maybe better to identify these issues on a more detailed level and create
smaller specifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #39 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Created attachment 38036
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38036&action=edit
CSiBE results for arm thumb1 and thumb2 code generation for various toolchains.
CSiBE results for arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #37 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I've completely lost track of this bug - is this still open on gcc 4.9 / 5 and
6 or just relevant to 4.9 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319
Bug ID: 70319
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Starke ---
(In reply to katayama.hirofumi...@gmail.com from comment #4)
> Hello, Andrew Pinski.
> Where is ld bug track?
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19480
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |[6 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70320
Bug ID: 70320
Summary: msp430 asm volatile does not accept lower-case
register names in clobber list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
Bug ID: 70321
Summary: [6 Regression] STV generates less optimized code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
"and" is also less optimized:
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 bitwise-1]$ cat and.i
extern long long x;
void
foo (long long ixi)
{
x = ixi & 14348907;
}
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 bitwise-1]$ make and.s
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
or and xor have the same issue:
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 bitwise-1]$ cat or.i
extern long long x;
void
foo (long long ixi)
{
x = ixi | 14348907;
}
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 bitwise-1]$ make or.s
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69799
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> No, the fix was applied to the correct test. coarray_allocate_5.f08 was
> a new test introduced
> with the fix that corrected coarray_allocate_3.f08.
> coarray_allocate_5.f08 isn't on gcc-5 branc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70322
Bug ID: 70322
Summary: STV doesn't optimize andn
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70322
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64*-none-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] Spurious |Spurious warning and crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||francois.willot at ensmp dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68750
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-*
Host|hppa64-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70322
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
TARGET_BMI isn't needed in *andndi3_doubleword since combine won't
generate BMI andn patterns unless BMI is enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Should STV split DImode early if STV is known to not profitable?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70302
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68750
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 38037
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38037&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70279
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70324
Bug ID: 70324
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pic-1.c (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70323
Bug ID: 70323
Summary: [6 regression] missing error on integer overflow in
constexpr function result converted to bool
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70325
Bug ID: 70325
Summary: ICE on __builtin_ia32_storedquqi256_mask
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70318
--- Comment #2 from Ian Mallett ---
"Did you interpret the standard as providing int sqrt(int);" Yes; I did. You're
right; what is supposed to exist is just "double sqrt(int);". Sorry for the
noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70326
Bug ID: 70326
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3 type 'e'
or 'u', have '0' (rtx note) in PATTERN, at rtl.h:1440
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 37531 [details]
> Fix for 5-branch
>
> 5-branch requires a slightly different fix. For some reason, the argument
> to copy is not being given the unlimited polymorphic attribute. E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70327
Bug ID: 70327
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mavx512ifma and v4ti argument
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70108
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |[5,6 Regression] FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70328
Bug ID: 70328
Summary: default generated destructors cause 'inlining failed'
warnings.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70329
Bug ID: 70329
Summary: wrong code with -mavx512bw and 64byte vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #36 from Giuseppe Ottaviano ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #35)
> I've backported the std::allocator_traits> partial
> specialization to the gcc-4.9 and gcc-5 branches now. Please let me know if
> this makes any differe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564
--- Comment #9 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
I confirm that my original example now runs without error with the current
6-branch. However this variation, where the allocated unlimited polymorphic
variable is passed back as a return arg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70282
--- Comment #2 from PeteVine ---
I'd like to add that, all else being equal about a month ago, Function.cpp
compiled just fine with -O3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70330
Bug ID: 70330
Summary: ICE with -Wextra -Wno-unused-dummy-argument and unused
optional dummy argument
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Giuseppe Ottaviano from comment #36)
> I reported our relative build times with my version of the partial
> specialization a few comments above:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70331
Bug ID: 70331
Summary: missing error dereferencing a dangling pointer in
constexpr function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160320 (experimental) [trunk revision 234355] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -c -std=c++14 small.cpp
small.cpp:4:9: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:13887
T m = m;
^
0x686f54 tsubst_copy
../../gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70332
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |5.4
Summary|[6 Regression] IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70333
Bug ID: 70333
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O0.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70334
Bug ID: 70334
Summary: use of only -fshort-double leads to internal compiler
error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||der.herr at hofr dot at
--- Comment #19
75 matches
Mail list logo
