[Bug libfortran/70684] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrect reading of values from file on Windows

2016-04-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 24 05:07:21 2016 New Revision: 235391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235391=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug c++/70776] New: ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

2016-04-23 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160423 (experimental) [trunk revision 235384] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk small.cpp -c g++-trunk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report

[Bug tree-optimization/70775] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

2016-04-23 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160423 (experimental) [trunk revision 235384] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ gcc-5.3 -O3 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:17:1: internal compiler error

[Bug c++/70774] New: constexpr function with reference parameter gives reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error

2016-04-23 Thread steven.spark at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70774 Bug ID: 70774 Summary: constexpr function with reference parameter gives reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70770] [5 Regression] constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

2016-04-23 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70353] [5 regression] ICE on __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in a constexpr function

2016-04-23 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mira.fontan at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

2016-04-23 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- This is the file in question: https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/blob/master/test/algorithm/transform.cpp

[Bug gcov-profile/70773] New: Profiling makes sudoku solver slower

2016-04-23 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773 Bug ID: 70773 Summary: Profiling makes sudoku solver slower Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

2016-04-23 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to James Almer from comment #2) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > Well, you simply need more RAM to compile this testcase, because gcc-6 uses > > slightly over 2GB peak,

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

2016-04-23 Thread jamrial at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 --- Comment #2 from James Almer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > Well, you simply need more RAM to compile this testcase, because gcc-6 uses > slightly over 2GB peak, so your machine starts swapping. > On my machine (with

[Bug rtl-optimization/70751] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/eliminate.c scan-assembler-times r0,[\\t ]*sp 3 since r235184

2016-04-23 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69143] PowerPC64: aggregate results are badly handled

2016-04-23 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > Similar to PR 28831, PR 23782? Indeed, though looks more like a base case for PR28831 than PR23782 at first glance. Ramana

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

2016-04-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even PATH=/opt/freeware/bin/:$PATH /home/jakub/gcc-6.0.1-RC-20160415/configure --disable-werror --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/cfarm

[Bug c++/70755] [ARM] excessive struct alignment for globals

2016-04-23 Thread bruck.michael at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70755 --- Comment #3 from Michael Bruck --- (In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > > This is a deliberate design choice. By doing this we gain significant > > benefits from having aligned

[Bug c++/70755] [ARM] excessive struct alignment for globals

2016-04-23 Thread bruck.michael at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70755 --- Comment #2 from Michael Bruck --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > This is a deliberate design choice. By doing this we gain significant > benefits from having aligned objects, which helps with data copying and > other

[Bug c/70772] Wrong warning about unspecified behavior for comparison with string literal

2016-04-23 Thread ch3root at openwall dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70772 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov --- clang bug -- https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27495 .

[Bug libfortran/70684] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrect reading of values from file on Windows

2016-04-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Andy May from comment #14) --- snip --- > > Of course, I really appreciate the work that goes into this. I've already > made a local patch file with your fix so that the mxe.cc gcc builds with

[Bug c/70772] New: Wrong warning about unspecified behavior for comparison with string literal

2016-04-23 Thread ch3root at openwall dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70772 Bug ID: 70772 Summary: Wrong warning about unspecified behavior for comparison with string literal Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/70771] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

2016-04-23 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160423 (experimental) [trunk revision 235384] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-5.3 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c small.c: In function ‘main’: small.c:18:1: internal compiler

[Bug c++/70770] constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

2016-04-23 Thread mira.fontan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 --- Comment #2 from Mira Fontan --- Created attachment 38333 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38333=edit preprocessed file

[Bug c++/70770] constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

2016-04-23 Thread mira.fontan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 --- Comment #1 from Mira Fontan --- Command line output: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/g++ Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5.3.1-14ubuntu2'

[Bug c++/70770] New: constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

2016-04-23 Thread mira.fontan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 Bug ID: 70770 Summary: constexpr expansion Internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

2016-04-23 Thread mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 Michael Mehlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot co

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

2016-04-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #41 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #40) > I see that you did not have /opt/freeware/bin in your path on AIX. How did > it even build without GNU Make and other build requirements? I've used gmake

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

2016-04-23 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #40 from David Edelsohn --- I see that you did not have /opt/freeware/bin in your path on AIX. How did it even build without GNU Make and other build requirements?

[Bug target/69143] PowerPC64: aggregate results are badly handled

2016-04-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Similar to PR 28831, PR 23782?

[Bug ada/70759] Ada rts fails to build with -mabi=ilp32

2016-04-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70759 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

2016-04-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #38) > The gt* files don't differ. > > I normally use > > --disable-werror --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm >

[Bug c++/70769] New: function definition wrongfully allowed inside comma separated member declaration list

2016-04-23 Thread fourmisain+gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70769 Bug ID: 70769 Summary: function definition wrongfully allowed inside comma separated member declaration list Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70767] std::numeric_limits::digits is wrong unless --std=c++11 used

2016-04-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70767 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#559 It has status CD1, I don't remember if that means it applies retroactively or not. (by the way, the 4.8 branch is not maintained anymore)

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

2016-04-23 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|