https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59400
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
Originally from http://stackoverflow.com/q/37064993/2756719
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972
Bug ID: 70972
Summary: [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking
parameters by value should move them, not copy
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
r216965 missed system-linux-ppc64.ads when it added pragma
No_Elaboration_Code_All.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5360
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
When compiling the following test with -m2a -mb -O2
double test (void)
{
return 123.123;
}
we get
mova.L2,r0
fmov.s @r0+,fr0
fmov.s @r0,fr1
rts
add #-4,r0
.L3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70971
Bug ID: 70971
Summary: ICE in parameter pack expansion
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70970
--- Comment #2 from Rodrigo ---
Just noticed a dumb mistake in the parameter order of memalign (_aligned_malloc
is (size, alignment); memalign is (alignment, size)) but the problem persists.
Also forgot that I had to use -march=native under 5.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70970
Rodrigo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38424|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri May 6 01:18:59 2016
New Revision: 235941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-05 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70970
Bug ID: 70970
Summary: Misaligned SSE with auto-vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969
Bug ID: 70969
Summary: power64le ada bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15:
violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 38423
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38423&action=edit
Preprocessed source
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/cc1plus -fpreprocessed interpret.ii -quiet -dumpbase
interpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70896
--- Comment #6 from PeteVine ---
Building with -mfpu=neon has duly helped. The fpu configure option is probably
not relevant here (simply setting the default for emitted code) but rather the
CFLAGS used for compiling these intrinsics. (-mfpu=vfpv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70968
Bug ID: 70968
Summary: Missed case for -Wmisleading-indentation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
--- Comment #30 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 5 22:48:29 2016
New Revision: 235936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235936&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70873
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70967
Bug ID: 70967
Summary: doc: Please document rotate idiom
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848
--- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson ---
Testing the vcond_mask* patch with make check gave 6 regressions for both armhf
and aarch64.
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-10.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-10.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70961
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The super_class has nothing to do with the class that is searched for
> renaming registers though, it's just the info passed to the back-end to
> compute this class. For example, on the ARM, the preferred_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
Bug ID: 70966
Summary: new_delete_resource() has deinit lifetime issues.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70961
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70875
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
tree_to_uhwi already contains the tree_fits_uhwi_p assert, so there is no
reason to duplicate that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70875
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Seems like an overzealous assert:
diff --git a/gcc/ubsan.c b/gcc/ubsan.c
index 802341e..080f798 100644
--- a/gcc/ubsan.c
+++ b/gcc/ubsan.c
@@ -302,11 +302,14 @@ ubsan_source_location (location_t loc)
static
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
With most of the documentation for each option consisting of "the file name is
made by appending .xxx to the source file name" I agree that in its current
form and state of completion the documentation isn't v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #6 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> This may be related to PR 50818.
PR 50818 has morphed into a feature request that the canonical
__builtin_va_{list,start,end,copy} builtins beh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965
Bug ID: 70965
Summary: ice in useless_type_conversion_p
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-28 00:00:00 |2016-5-5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Thu May 5 16:20:54 2016
New Revision: 235926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR tree-optimization/57206
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.1.0
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964
Bug ID: 70964
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
single_succ_edge, at basic-block.h:351
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
Bug ID: 70963
Summary: vec_cts/vec_ctf intrinsics produce wrong results for
64-bit floating point
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wron
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16106
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70956
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
The change looks good to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68105
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to zboson from comment #0)
> In addition, the following equations are always true even without
> associative math.
>
> 2*a = a + a
> 3*a = a + a + a
> 4*a = a + a + a + a
> 5*a = a +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70962
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70962
Bug ID: 70962
Summary: optimization not working in Red Hat 5.7 after glibc
patching
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70961
Bug ID: 70961
Summary: Regrename ignores preferred_rename_class
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70896
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68105
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zboson at zboson dot net
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70873
--- Comment #29 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 38419
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38419&action=edit
Patch to fix problematic splitters
I'm testing the attached patch that introduces
ix86_standard_x87sse_constant_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70517
blastrock at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38165|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70960
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160505 (experimental) [trunk revision 235918] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70810
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Here is a simplified version of your code which gives an error using GCC, Clang
and Intel icc:
template
T declval();
template
struct function {
template()(declval()...))>
function(F) { }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70810
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70959
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70954
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #2 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
Created attachment 38417
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38417&action=edit
va_test.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #1 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
Created attachment 38416
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38416&action=edit
va_main.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
--- Comment #5 from Roger Orr ---
Still fails with gcc 6.1
Are there any plans on how (and when) to fix this, fairly serious, fault?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70956
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #1 from vries a
56 matches
Mail list logo
