[Bug c++/71207] gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207 Vladimir Simonov changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |critical

[Bug c++/71143] [7 Regression] bogus error: ‘A’ is not a base of ‘B< >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target

[Bug c++/71209] [c++] erroneous 'is not a base class of' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71209 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/71143] [7 Regression] bogus error: ‘A’ is not a base of ‘B< >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/70448] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70448 rippey.e at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rippey.e at gmail dot com

[Bug libfortran/71123] Namelist read failure on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71123 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- This patch regression tests OK and fixes the namelist read. diff --git a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c index b8e174c5..6ea6007a 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c +++

[Bug other/71212] New: Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212 Bug ID: 71212 Summary: Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem. Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71210] New: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

with: ../s-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/craig/new-gcc/i-trunk Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160519 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/71209] New: [c++] erroneous 'is not a base class of' error

++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ryan.burn at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The below code compiles fine with clang and a version of gcc build from trunk on 20160428, but with the trunk version from 20160519, it gives this bad error message: B::B

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 --- Comment #4 from Paul Eggert --- I worked around the GCC bug by applying the attached file etags.c.patch to GNU Emacs. etags.c.patch replaces some weird but valid C code (add a small constant to a pointer and test whether the resulting

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 --- Comment #3 from Paul Eggert --- Created attachment 38532 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38532=edit patched version of e.i that avoids GCC bug

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 --- Comment #2 from Paul Eggert --- Created attachment 38531 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38531=edit GNU Emacs lib-src/etags.c patch to work around GCC bug

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- I am starting a bootstrap+regtest with: /* (X ^ Y) ^ (X ^ Z) -> Y ^ Z */ (simplify (bit_xor (convert1? (bit_xor:c @0 @1)) (convert2? (bit_xor:c @0 @2))) (if (tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I haven't yet started, so if you want to take it, it is all yours.

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- With -O: int f(int d, unsigned b) { int i2 = b ^ 1; int i4 = d ^ 1; return i2 ^ i4; } An extra (convert ...) should do it I guess.

[Bug target/71208] New: [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208 Bug ID: 71208 Summary: [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/71207] gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207 Vladimir Simonov changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |5.3.0 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir

[Bug c++/70494] [5 regression] Internal Compiler Error: Capturing an array of vectors in a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70494 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71207] New: gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207 Bug ID: 71207 Summary: gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] New: ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160519 (experimental) [trunk revision 236439] (GCC) $: $: gcc-trunk -O0 small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:4:6: error: type mismatch in binary expression void fn1() { fn1

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Fixed by r236460. Thanks. Please add a reference to the PR in the ChangeLog next time, this will automatically add a cross-reference in the audit trail.

[Bug c/71171] [6/7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in can_be_stored_compactly_p (line-map.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71171] [6/7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in can_be_stored_compactly_p (line-map.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu May 19 20:33:51 2016 New Revision: 236489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236489=gcc=rev Log: PR c/71171: Fix uninitialized source_range in c_parser_postfix_expression A

[Bug c/71171] [6/7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in can_be_stored_compactly_p (line-map.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu May 19 20:29:07 2016 New Revision: 236488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236488=gcc=rev Log: PR c/71171: Fix uninitialized source_range in c_parser_postfix_expression A

[Bug c++/71075] Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Forgotten to mention subcases : $ cat z3a.f90 program p character(3), parameter :: a(4) = ' ' character(*), parameter :: x(*) = a(1:2)(3:1) end $

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 --- Comment #4 from François Dumont --- I guess you are talking about 61667. I think this report is quite new. At the moment reserve is implemented as proposed by the Standard but I agree with Alexey that demonstrated behavior is

[Bug c++/71075] Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71075 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 19 20:23:52 2016 New Revision: 236487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236487=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71075 * pt.c (unify_template_argument_mismatch): Use %qE

[Bug fortran/70913] ICE in gfc_encode_character, at fortran/target-memory.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70913 --- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Another situation : $ cat z4.f90 program p character(3) :: a(2) = ['abc', 'xyz'] character(3) :: b(1,2) = ' ' equivalence (b, a) end $ gfortran-6 z4.f90

[Bug c++/71205] New: c++14 wrong constructor resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71205 Bug ID: 71205 Summary: c++14 wrong constructor resolution Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71075] Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 --- Comment #39 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 19 19:20:40 2016 New Revision: 236486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236486=gcc=rev Log: Fix handling of non-dependent calls with default template args.

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71204] New: ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 Bug ID: 71204 Summary: ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/71184] ICE on "operator new["

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71184] ICE on "operator new["

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu May 19 18:56:47 2016 New Revision: 236485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236485=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71184: Fix NULL dereference in cp_parser_operator The source-range

[Bug fortran/71203] New: ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 Bug ID: 71203 Summary: ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71203] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1512 and :1564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71203 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- $ cat z4.f90 program p integer :: i integer, parameter :: x(2) = 0 integer, parameter :: y(*) = [(x(i:i), i=1,2)] end $ gfortran-6 z4.f90 f951: internal

[Bug bootstrap/71198] [7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71198 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/71198] [7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71198 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/71031] [6 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, at tree-vrp.c:2535 w/ -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71031] [6 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, at tree-vrp.c:2535 w/ -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 19 18:42:31 2016 New Revision: 236484 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236484=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71031 * tree-vrp.c

[Bug c++/71184] ICE on "operator new["

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu May 19 18:10:30 2016 New Revision: 236483 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236483=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71184: Fix NULL dereference in cp_parser_operator The source-range

[Bug c++/70865] [cilkplus] errors when using cilk features with precompiled headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70865 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/69582] [meta-bug] Cilk+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582 Bug 69582 depends on bug 70865, which changed state. Bug 70865 Summary: [cilkplus] errors when using cilk features with precompiled headers https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70865 What|Removed

[Bug c/71202] GCC's -funsigned-char ignored by -Wpointer-sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71202 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71202] New: GCC's -funsigned-char ignored by -Wpointer-sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71202 Bug ID: 71202 Summary: GCC's -funsigned-char ignored by -Wpointer-sign Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #23 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to shatz from comment #22) > It sucks. The software can't be changed after release, for obvious reasons, > but docs are not software. > If it's impossible to change the policy about not

[Bug c++/71197] for range loop causes an error with inline function references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71197 Heiko Becker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heirecka at exherbo dot org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/71196] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_string_init, at fortran/trans-const.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71196 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/71031] [6 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, at tree-vrp.c:2535 w/ -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/71031] [6/7 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, at tree-vrp.c:2535 w/ -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 19 15:45:35 2016 New Revision: 236477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236477=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71031 * tree-vrp.c

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #39 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 19 15:19:59 2016 New Revision: 236476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236476=gcc=rev Log: Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0 2016-05-19 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/71075] Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71075 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- This should fix it: --- a/gcc/cp/error.c +++ b/gcc/cp/error.c @@ -1269,6 +1269,14 @@ dump_decl (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree t, int flags) dump_type (pp, t, flags); break; +case VOID_CST:

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #38 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 19 15:17:10 2016 New Revision: 236475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236475=gcc=rev Log: [PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions 2016-05-19 Martin

[Bug c++/71075] Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71075 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71200] [7 regression] ICE (segfault) with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71200 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #37 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 19 15:10:50 2016 New Revision: 236474 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236474=gcc=rev Log: Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0 2016-05-19 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/71200] [7 regression] ICE (segfault) with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71200 --- Comment #3 from Martin Reinecke --- In fact, the problem seems to have been patched away very recently. With a fresh checkout of gcc trunk the test case compiles fine. Sorry for the noise! Should I close the bug

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #36 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 19 15:09:21 2016 New Revision: 236473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236473=gcc=rev Log: [PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions 2016-05-19 Martin

[Bug target/71201] PowerPC XXPERM instruction fails on ISA 3.0 system.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71201 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- >From what I can see, the left-shifted piece of this is not being computed properly. Looks like maybe register allocation is getting confused and not treating v17/vs49 as the same thing? Hard to

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #22 from shatz at dsit dot co.il --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21) > It can't be changed in those manuals, ever, both 6.1 and 5.3 releases have > already been released, their documentation, including online docs, is

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- For atomic Clang rejects use of its builtin with a void*: /usr/local/libcxx-head/include/c++/v1/atomic:1081:40: error: incomplete type 'void' where a complete type is required But it allows the

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #34 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 19 14:56:35 2016 New Revision: 236462 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236462=gcc=rev Log: [PR 70646] Store size to inlining predicate conditions 2016-05-19 Martin

[Bug target/71201] PowerPC XXPERM instruction fails on ISA 3.0 system.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71201 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/69068] [6/7 Regression] ICE in bb_contains_loop_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1279

Rainer Orth --- Between 20160513 and 20160519, a new testsuite failure occured on Solaris/SPARC (32- and 64-bit): FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (test for excess errors) /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite

[Bug ipa/70646] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #35 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu May 19 15:00:12 2016 New Revision: 236463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236463=gcc=rev Log: Respect --param ipa-max-agg-items=0 2016-05-19 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/71092] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1449; only with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

from Rainer Orth --- Between 20160513 and 20160519, the following failures started to appear on sparc*-*-solaris2.*, both 32- and 64-bit: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1 FAIL: gc

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- The same problem exists for std::atomic

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, I'm not aware of one.

[Bug c++/71200] [7 regression] ICE (segfault) with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71200 --- Comment #2 from Martin Reinecke --- I'm not sure why, but on a different machine I get a more detailed error output, which might help locating the problem: martin@noemi-laptop ~/Downloads $ g++ -v -O3 -c

[Bug c++/71200] [7 regression] ICE (segfault) with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71200 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/71201] PowerPC XXPERM instruction fails on ISA 3.0 system.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71201 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71201] New: PowerPC XXPERM instruction fails on ISA 3.0 system.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71201 Bug ID: 71201 Summary: PowerPC XXPERM instruction fails on ISA 3.0 system. Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yup, they both use the do_copy_file function to do the work. I'll see what I can do about tweaking the configure test next week.

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- The new experimental/filesystem/operations/copy_file.cc test suffers from the same problem. Rainer

[Bug target/71009] g++: ICE on modified gdb/valarith.c with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/71200] New: [7 regression] ICE (segfault) with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71200 Bug ID: 71200 Summary: [7 regression] ICE (segfault) with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71164] tree check fail at cp/pt.c:12961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71164 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71152] NULL is not cast to (void *) as it ought to be if compiling code with -c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71152 --- Comment #6 from Ray Strode --- i do indeed seem to have ccache installed, thanks.

[Bug c/71199] Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- How does _Generic interact with C++ if one includes the same header file in either language?

[Bug c/71199] Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/71198] [7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c/71199] Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Doesn't C have generics for this now?

[Bug c/71199] New: Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 Bug ID: 71199 Summary: Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c/71199] Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/71177] Spurious -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71177 --- Comment #4 from Tavian Barnes --- > I remember seeing a similar bugreport. PR57199 is very similar, pretty much an exact dupe actually.

[Bug target/71056] [6/7 Regression] __builtin_bswap32 NEON instruction error with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71056 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu May 19 13:43:58 2016 New Revision: 236459 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236459=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/71056: Don't use vectorized builtins when NEON is

[Bug bootstrap/71198] New: [7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71198 Bug ID: 71198 Summary: [7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/71157] -Wnull-dereference false alarm in wrong function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71157 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/71183] [7 Regression] gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183 --- Comment #4 from James Clarke --- Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01487.html

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- It can't be changed in those manuals, ever, both 6.1 and 5.3 releases have already been released, their documentation, including online docs, is what has been released at that point.

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #20 from shatz at dsit dot co.il --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #19) > Markus recently committed a patch (r235580) that points out that this > attribute should only be used for debugging. 3 weeks after the patch I see no

[Bug fortran/71156] PURE interface/definition inconsistency: accepts invalid, rejects valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 38527 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38527=edit Draft patch for the PR This regtests OK on 7.0.0. I want to check if there is a more elegant way of fixing the problem

  1   2   >