[Bug inline-asm/71572] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71572 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |inline-asm --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c++/71577] New: ICE on invalid C++11 code (with extra struct initializer) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1117

with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC) $ $ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp small.cpp:1:36: error: too many initializers for ‘’ struct { int a; } s1

[Bug c++/71576] New: ICE on valid C++11 code (with xvalue and bitfield) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in build_target_expr, at cp/tree.c:385

-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC) $ $ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’: small.cpp:10:26

[Bug regression/71575] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 --- Comment #1 from Aric Belsito --- Forgot this in OP: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-gentoo-linux-musl/gcc-bin/6.1.0/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-gentoo-linux-musl/6.1.0/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug regression/71575] New: internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 Bug ID: 71575 Summary: internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/71574] New: ICE on code with alloc_align attribute on x86_64-linux-gnu: in default_conversion, at c/c-typeck.c:2126

-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -c small.c small.c:2:1: internal compiler error: in default_conversion, at c/c-typeck.c:2118 int fn2

[Bug c/71573] New: ICE on invalid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected function_decl, have var_decl in implicitly_declare)

with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC) $: $: gcc-trunk small.c small.c: In function ‘f2’: small.c:4:3: internal compiler error

[Bug target/71571] [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71571] [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/71572] New: ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671

++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC) $ $ clang-3.8 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:7:3: internal compiler error: in force_constant_size

[Bug target/71338] [RL78] mulu instruction not used on G10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338 --- Comment #2 from dj at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dj Date: Fri Jun 17 22:24:17 2016 New Revision: 237566 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237566=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71338 * config/rl78/rl78-expand.c (umulqihi3): Enable for G10. *

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- > The tentative fix restored bootstrap on sparc-linux. Test results look > OK-ish. Thanks, I'll post it tomorrow morning.

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10) > (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) > > > Created attachment 38699 [details] > > > Tentative fix. > > > > It successfully passed a full

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The patch is completely untested though (and wonder if we have testcases for > not raising exceptions when isgreater etc. arguments

[Bug target/71571] [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 David B. Robins changed: What|Removed |Added Target||crisv32-axis-linux-gnu

[Bug target/71571] [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 --- Comment #2 from David B. Robins --- Created attachment 38721 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38721=edit Larger repro - crashes reliably - requires additional -O2 -fno-inline

[Bug target/71571] [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 --- Comment #1 from David B. Robins --- Created attachment 38720 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38720=edit Small repro - emits branch (ba) without delay-slot instruction

[Bug target/71571] New: [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 Bug ID: 71571 Summary: [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/71545] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect irreflexive comparison debug check in std::lower_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71545] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect irreflexive comparison debug check in std::lower_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jun 17 18:53:46 2016 New Revision: 237561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237561=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++/71545 fix debug checks in binary search algorithms PR

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- This is related to PR 37158?

[Bug libstdc++/71545] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect irreflexive comparison debug check in std::lower_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jun 17 18:28:34 2016 New Revision: 237560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237560=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++/71545 fix debug checks in binary search algorithms PR

[Bug c++/71548] Invalid declaration involving template template param causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- If I compile the above testcase with -O2 -mavx -ftrapping-math, then it generates vucomiss in each case, which seems wrong to me (because for gt/ge/lt/le it should raise exceptions, so IMHO should use

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug c++/71570] New: ICE on invalid C++11 code (with invalid variable capture) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:551

: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘void foo

[Bug c++/71569] [5/6] Crash: External definition of template member from template struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/71143] [7 Regression] bogus error: ‘A’ is not a base of ‘B< >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143 --- Comment #7 from Vidya Praveen --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 17 16:35:33 2016 New Revision: 237558 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237558=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71209 - wrong error with dependent base * typeck.c

[Bug tree-optimization/71550] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71550 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug c/71560] union compound literal initializes wrong union field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71569] New: [5/6] Crash: External definition of template member from template struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569 Bug ID: 71569 Summary: [5/6] Crash: External definition of template member from template struct Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/71143] [7 Regression] bogus error: ‘A’ is not a base of ‘B< >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71209] [c++] erroneous 'is not a base class of' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71209 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 17 16:35:33 2016 New Revision: 237558 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237558=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71209 - wrong error with dependent base * typeck.c

[Bug c++/71143] [7 Regression] bogus error: ‘A’ is not a base of ‘B< >’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I've created the table just by walking through the 'D' handling. That said, looking e.g. at https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/IEEE754.PDF for the C comparisons (EQ, NE, LT, LE, GT, GE)

[Bug libstdc++/71545] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect irreflexive comparison debug check in std::lower_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The irreflexive assertion is incorrect for lexicographical compare too: #include struct X { }; bool operator<(X, int) { return true; } bool operator<(int, X) { return false; } // Not a strict weak

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #6 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- Hope you guys can do that and fix this problem soon. It would much appreciated as we are (at Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Spain) doing research on KNL and we need the fastest/most robust code we

[Bug c++/71568] New: Inexplicable error: "X is inaccessible within this context" for a public member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568 Bug ID: 71568 Summary: Inexplicable error: "X is inaccessible within this context" for a public member Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/71567] Incorrect loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71508] Huge memory usage on compiling with many types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71508 --- Comment #2 from Paul Olaru --- Created attachment 38716 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38716=edit Preprocessed source (gzipped) The uncompressed file is barely above 1MB.

[Bug tree-optimization/71354] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Jun 17 13:55:06 2016 New Revision: 237555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237555=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71354 * gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c: Use

[Bug c/71567] New: Incorrect loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567 Bug ID: 71567 Summary: Incorrect loop optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/71544] gfortran compiler optimization bug when dealing with c-style pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544 --- Comment #6 from fortranbug at gmail dot com --- Thank you for the suggested workaround. This can certainly be helpful in the short term. However, we would not want to rely on tuning compiler optimization switches in the future to ensure

[Bug c++/59861] Inconsistent error output format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59861 milasudril at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement

[Bug c++/71541] destructor of condition_variable_any crashes with static linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71541 --- Comment #6 from Hans Philipp Annen --- > -Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive This did help. Without it, the destructor of condition_variable just jumps to nowhere: > Dump of assembler code for function

[Bug libstdc++/71562] Changing the hard coded size of _S_local_capacity in sso_string_base.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71562 --- Comment #2 from Peter VARGA --- I disagree 100% with your comment! I am definitely NOT a genius and I needed 5 minutes to find out where the hard coded size is set. Look at the GNU Glibc - you can crash an existing

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #4 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- I wasn't sure but that was my intuition. But I'm afraid I don't have enough knowledge to propose a fix. (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I'd say it is a bug in

[Bug c++/71566] Attribute [[aligned(16)]] on function is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71566 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71545] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect irreflexive comparison debug check in std::lower_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/71541] destructor of condition_variable_any crashes with static linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71541 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- It does for Fedora and Red Hat-derived systems. Try: -Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive

[Bug libstdc++/71562] Changing the hard coded size of _S_local_capacity in sso_string_base.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71562 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Peter VARGA from comment #0) > This would increase the flexibility for the programmer without a hack in the > c++ include file... Allowing programmers to change the ABI per-translation unit

[Bug c++/71566] Attribute [[aligned(16)]] on function is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71566 denis.campredon at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denis.campredon at

[Bug tree-optimization/71347] [7 regression] Performance drop after r235513 on x86-64 in 32-bit mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Jun 17 09:26:05 2016 New Revision: 237552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237552=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71347 * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c

[Bug tree-optimization/71354] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Jun 17 09:21:12 2016 New Revision: 237551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237551=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71354 * gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c: Add

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71566] New: Attribute [[aligned(16)]] on function is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71566 Bug ID: 71566 Summary: Attribute [[aligned(16)]] on function is ignored Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/64385] odd behaviour of std::is_move_constructible< std::ostringstream >

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64385 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71563] [6/7 Regression] Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > That said, about the zero/non-zero bits, it is > even more complicated in this case, because e.g. 1 / -1 has all bits set, > the thing is just that it is then

[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/71565] New: INTENT(IN) polymorphic argument with pointer components - reject valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71565 Bug ID: 71565 Summary: INTENT(IN) polymorphic argument with pointer components - reject valid code Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/71561] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -Wall on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71561 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/71563] [6/7 Regression] Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/71563] [6/7 Regression] Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56164] [avr] ICE: spill fail with __flash keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164 Pitchumani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pitchumani.s at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug target/53935] [avr][c++] missing warning for non-const data in progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53935 Pitchumani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pitchumani.s at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug target/52305] [avr] ICE in avr_print_operand: unknown mode (const_double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52305 Pitchumani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pitchumani.s at hotmail dot com ---