[Bug fortran/71883] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71883] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Jul 29 05:16:05 2016 New Revision: 238848 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238848=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-29 Steven G. Kargl Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/72741] Fortran OpenACC routine directive doesn't properly handle clauses specifying the level of parallelism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741 --- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Fri Jul 29 04:20:00 2016 New Revision: 238847 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238847=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/72741 gcc/fortran/ * openmp.c

[Bug target/72749] New: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 Bug ID: 72749 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

[Bug target/72748] New: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 with -g enabled in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5952

=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160728 (experimental) [trunk

[Bug rtl-optimization/68217] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68217 --- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Fri Jul 29 00:35:23 2016 New Revision: 238846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238846=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-07-29 Kugan Vivekanandarajah

[Bug target/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g

[Bug target/72747] New: powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 Bug ID: 72747 Summary: powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69964] ICE on misspelled end block data, in gfc_ascii_statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69964 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- This appears to be fixed on trunk.

[Bug fortran/71067] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on data initialization with insufficient value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/71067] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on data initialization with insufficient value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jul 28 23:12:23 2016 New Revision: 238842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238842=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/72103] ICE with gcc 7 for povray benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72103 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- I looked, and decided there wasn't much we could do. So the main nastiness in the sequence is the mem store/load, but that is just reload running out of regs and spilling. Yes, it looks really dumb when

[Bug tree-optimization/72746] New: gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160728 (experimental) [trunk revision 238824] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 abc.c abc.c: In function ‘fn1’: abc.c:12:20: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero] *d

[Bug fortran/71544] gfortran compiler optimization bug when dealing with c-style pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Confirmed as fortran FE bug. The FE manages to set ".r" as fn spec attribute > on save_cptr which specifies that its first argument does not escape.

[Bug tree-optimization/49695] conditional moves for stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug c++/72457] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Reduced: template struct box { Element value; constexpr box() : value{} {} }; struct B: box { }; template box::box();

[Bug fortran/71883] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Jul 28 21:21:49 2016 New Revision: 238841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238841=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl Thomas Koenig

[Bug libstdc++/72745] Please static assert in std::get to check out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/72745] New: Please static assert in std::get to check out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745 Bug ID: 72745 Summary: Please static assert in std::get to check out of range Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/71799] [7 Regression] ICE in DO loop code emission (gfc_resolve_iterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/72457] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/71799] [7 Regression] ICE in DO loop code emission (gfc_resolve_iterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jul 28 19:04:12 2016 New Revision: 238830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238830=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/71665] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with non-integral constant enumerator value: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/71665] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with non-integral constant enumerator value: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jul 28 18:43:29 2016 New Revision: 238828 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238828=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-07-28 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug fortran/71859] ICE on same variable/subroutine name (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71859 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/71859] ICE on same variable/subroutine name (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71859 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jul 28 17:48:54 2016 New Revision: 238825 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238825=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/72744] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72744 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- As known, case above works with "workshare" : $ cat z2.f90 program p integer, parameter :: n = 20 integer :: i, z(n), h(n) z = [(i, i=1,n)] h = [(i,

[Bug fortran/72744] New: ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72744 Bug ID: 72744 Summary: ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1039 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/71858] Surprising suggestions for misspellings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/72743] New: ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743 Bug ID: 72743 Summary: ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71858] Surprising suggestions for misspellings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/71939] sole flexible array member in an anonymous structure rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71939 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/71986] Bug bug when compiling gammu-1.37.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71986 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Walter Spector changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net --- Comment

[Bug target/72103] ICE with gcc 7 for povray benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72103 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Per c#3, could we please have another bug opened to track the tragic code generation opportunity? ;)

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #48 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Jul 28 15:46:07 2016 New Revision: 238824 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238824=gcc=rev Log: PR c/7652 * jcf-dump.c (print_constant): Add break. Modified:

[Bug target/72738] internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #2) > (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #1) > > Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed > > from GCC 4.9 through to trunk. > > > >

[Bug target/72742] New: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309 (error: unrecognizable insn) w/ -Os -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72742 Bug ID: 72742 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309 (error: unrecognizable insn) w/ -Os -mlra Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/71883] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Jul 28 14:47:02 2016 New Revision: 238822 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238822=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/72741] New: Fortran OpenACC routine directive doesn't properly handle clauses specifying the level of parallelism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741 Bug ID: 72741 Summary: Fortran OpenACC routine directive doesn't properly handle clauses specifying the level of parallelism Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/71734] [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd4.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734 --- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Jul 28 14:19:18 2016 New Revision: 238817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238817=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ 2016-07-28 Yuri Rumyantsev PR

[Bug c/71573] ICE on invalid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected function_decl, have var_decl in implicitly_declare)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71573 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- gcc34 is fine: q.c: In function `f2': q.c:4: error: called object is not a function but even r104500 ICEs, so this is ancient regression.

[Bug middle-end/71942] [ARM] Zero-extending whats allready zero-extended even when -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71942 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/72657] [7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in ix86_expand_builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/72657] [7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in ix86_expand_builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Jul 28 12:58:37 2016 New Revision: 238816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238816=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/72657 PR target/72683 * tree-chkp.c

[Bug target/72683] [7 Regression] MPX test failures with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72683 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Jul 28 12:58:37 2016 New Revision: 238816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238816=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/72657 PR target/72683 * tree-chkp.c

[Bug ada/72740] New: gnat.dg/specs/access[12].ads ICE when compiling with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72740 Bug ID: 72740 Summary: gnat.dg/specs/access[12].ads ICE when compiling with -g Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/71961] [7 Regression] 178.galgel in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961 --- Comment #15 from Renlin Li --- The change r238497 has been reverted as r238815. I confirmed that, after the revert, the 178.gagel mis-compare is fixed in aarch64-linux environment. PR 71902 is reopend as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/72739] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-mask-store-move-1.c after r238301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72739 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug fortran/71902] [5/6 Regression] Unneeded temporary on reallocatable character assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902 --- Comment #6 from Renlin Li --- Author: renlin Date: Thu Jul 28 11:21:53 2016 New Revision: 238815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238815=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH] Revert Revert r238497 because of PR 71961. This patch reverts the change for

[Bug fortran/71961] [7 Regression] 178.galgel in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961 --- Comment #14 from Renlin Li --- Author: renlin Date: Thu Jul 28 11:21:53 2016 New Revision: 238815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238815=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH] Revert Revert r238497 because of PR 71961. This patch reverts the change for

[Bug tree-optimization/72739] New: [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-mask-store-move-1.c after r238301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72739 Bug ID: 72739 Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-mask-store-move-1.c after r238301 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/72738] internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #1) > Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed > from GCC 4.9 through to trunk. > > Note that it isn't immediately clear that this is valid

[Bug target/72738] internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64*|arm* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/72738] internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738 --- Comment #1 from James Greenhalgh --- Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed from GCC 4.9 through to trunk. Note that it isn't immediately clear that this is valid code - operations on poly128_t other than

[Bug c/71574] ICE on code with alloc_align attribute on x86_64-linux-gnu: in default_conversion, at c/c-typeck.c:2126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71574 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Started with my r210262.

[Bug target/72736] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #5) > (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #4) > > Thanks, and sorry to waste your time with it. > > > > Before I spin up another report that wastes a lot

[Bug target/72738] New: internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738 Bug ID: 72738 Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2318 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/72712] [7 Regression] Tenfold compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Btw, is the compile-time spent in the threading or in followup passes that > blow up with the large number of BBs? > I was quite surprised because the

[Bug target/72736] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 --- Comment #5 from James Greenhalgh --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #4) > Thanks, and sorry to waste your time with it. > > Before I spin up another report that wastes a lot time, does this look like > another issue with me

[Bug target/72736] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton --- Thanks, and sorry to waste your time with it. Before I spin up another report that wastes a lot time, does this look like another issue with me (likely), or an issue with GCC (unlikely): internal compiler

[Bug target/72736] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/72736] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/72736] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 72737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/72737] warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72737 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/68025] pragma/attribute optimize("profile-arcs") does not work as intended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/68025] pragma/attribute optimize("profile-arcs") does not work as intended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jul 28 08:45:29 2016 New Revision: 238811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238811=gcc=rev Log: Introduce no_profile_instrument_function attribute PR gcov-profile/68025

[Bug tree-optimization/72517] [7 Regression] 436.cactusADM: More than 40% regression in O3 and Ofast on AMD bdver4 m/c.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72517 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12) > On July 27, 2016 7:02:07 PM GMT+02:00, "Amit.Pawar at amd dot com" > wrote: >

[Bug target/72717] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3693 with vector shift @ powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/70944] [7 Regression] ICE in immed_wide_int_const, at emit-rtl.c:606 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70944 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70944] [7 Regression] ICE in immed_wide_int_const, at emit-rtl.c:606 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70944 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jul 28 08:26:51 2016 New Revision: 238808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238808=gcc=rev Log: Do not allow make_compound_operation for vector mode *

[Bug tree-optimization/72712] [7 Regression] Tenfold compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I've noted that we have suspiciously many 'thread' passes but of couse the transform itself looks not appropriately limited. Btw, is the compile-time spent in the threading or in followup passes that blow

[Bug driver/70132] ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #8) > Fixed on trunk for now. > Will backport after some time to the branches Bump... I don't think this has made it into Debian's 4.9.2-10.

[Bug driver/70132] ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Jeffrey Walton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||noloader at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/72737] New: warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72737 Bug ID: 72737 Summary: warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug target/72736] New: warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736 Bug ID: 72736 Summary: warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with -march=armv8-a switch Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor