[Bug middle-end/65668] gcc does not know how to use __eabi_uldivmod properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65668 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69197] Can't compile older

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug testsuite/60048] scan-assembler results depend on '--with-arch='

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60048 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77394] internal compiler error with Intel 3825U, cygwin 64 bit compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77394 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug c/77394] New: internal compiler error with Intel 3825U, cygwin 64 bit compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77394 Bug ID: 77394 Summary: internal compiler error with Intel 3825U, cygwin 64 bit compiler Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Re: Possible GCC C parser bug

On 2016.08.27 at 07:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.08.26 at 20:43 +, Toshi Morita wrote: > > Tried to create an account on Bugzilla, won't let me create an account. > > So posting directly to the bugs list. > > > > cdecl says "const int const * pntr" is a syntax error. > > GCC

Re: Possible GCC C parser bug

On 2016.08.26 at 20:43 +, Toshi Morita wrote: > Tried to create an account on Bugzilla, won't let me create an account. > So posting directly to the bugs list. > > cdecl says "const int const * pntr" is a syntax error. > GCC accepts the same construct without warning or error. > I suspect cde

[Bug libstdc++/77356] regex error for a ECMAScript syntax string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77356] regex error for a ECMAScript syntax string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356 --- Comment #2 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Sat Aug 27 02:03:23 2016 New Revision: 239794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239794&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/77356 * include/bits/regex_compiler.tcc(_M_inser

[Bug debug/77389] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/template-params-12f.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-times DIE \\\\([^\\n]*\\\\) DW_TAG_template_value_param ...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77389 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77349] AIX DWARF debugging offset in 64 bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77349 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Fri Aug 26 23:51:27 2016 New Revision: 239790 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239790&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/77349 * config/rs6000/xcoff.h (DWARF_OFFSET_SIZE): Define as PTR_

[Bug c++/77375] [5/6/7 Regression] constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > C402 (R401) A colon shall not be used as a type-param-value except > in the declaration of an entity or component that has the POINTER > or ALLOCATABLE attribute. > > There is no "except for a named

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/71959] [OpenACC] #pragma acc parallel leads to segfault in x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-accel-nvptx-none-gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71959 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- Fixed on gomp4 branch r239788. You now get a link error, rather than an ICE.

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Sorry, but I think the constraint C402 does not apply to named constants (AKA PARAMETER). The constraint appears in > 4.2 Type parameters > 1 A type might be parameterized. In this case, the set of va

[Bug target/77289] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4) Thank you for working on this PR. > Adding Vlad since there are IRA and LRA questions. > > > > I'm not sure if IRA is supposed to always assign operand 1 the

[Bug libfortran/77393] New: [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Bug ID: 77393 Summary: [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77375] [5/6/7 Regression] constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/72807] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on armhf-linux-gnuabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72807 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77379] incorrect mangling for non-virtual adjustor thunk (missing abi tag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77379 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70713] msp430 interrupt attribute prevents overriding weak symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70713 --- Comment #2 from Joe Seymour --- Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01882.html

[Bug fortran/77391] New: gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 Bug ID: 77391 Summary: gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0

[Bug target/77344] Internal Compiler Error with arch knl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/57728] Explicit template instantiation with defaulted method causes missing symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57728 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 26 15:10:51 2016 New Revision: 239782 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239782&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/57728 - explicit instantiation and defaulted functions

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #9 from Berni --- GCC 7-20160821 works as expected!

[Bug c++/60796] Default move constructor not generated by explicit template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/57728] Explicit template instantiation with defaulted method causes missing symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57728 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brian.freyburger@blandertec

[Bug libstdc++/51960] [DR 2127] Missing move-assignment operator in raw_storage_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/51960] [DR 2127] Missing move-assignment operator in raw_storage_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 26 13:11:29 2016 New Revision: 239781 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239781&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++/51960 move-construction for raw_storage_iterator PR li

[Bug middle-end/77357] strlen of constant strings not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Ok, I'm less interested in -O0 but even with -O1 we fail for global_struct and local_struct. We can improve things by doing Index: gcc/expr.c ===

[Bug tree-optimization/69047] memcpy is not as optimized as union is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69047 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69047] memcpy is not as optimized as union is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69047 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 26 12:33:43 2016 New Revision: 239778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239778&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-26 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69047

[Bug c++/77388] Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, andre.simoesdiasvieira at arm dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 > > --- Comment #5 from Andre Vieira --- > I see, thank you! > > Oh and l

[Bug c++/77388] Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 --- Comment #5 from Andre Vieira --- I see, thank you! Oh and leaving out the const yields an error: t.cpp:28:16: error: cannot bind packed field '((B*)this)->B::s->test_struct::c' to 'short int&' return A (s->c);

[Bug libstdc++/51960] [DR 2127] Missing move-assignment operator in raw_storage_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51960 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug gcov-profile/77378] [7 Regression] tree-profile and libgcov assume long long atomic operations are supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77378 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn --- Configure might work for multilib libgcov. It's mode dependent (-m32/-m64) in GCC, so a single configure check is not sufficient.

[Bug fortran/77390] New: generates INDIRECT_REF of void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390 Bug ID: 77390 Summary: generates INDIRECT_REF of void type Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/77388] Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, andre.simoesdiasvieira at arm dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 > > --- Comment #3 from Andre Vieira --- > Thank you Richard! > > I have a

[Bug c++/77388] Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 --- Comment #3 from Andre Vieira --- Thank you Richard! I have a follow up question. Why is this only a problem when passing by reference and not when passing a pointer? So say: #define PACKED __attribute__ ((packed)) #define TYPE_C short typ

[Bug bootstrap/70473] genautomata memory footprint for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you please try the latest GCC trunk revision r239772 or later? The genautomata memory usage should have decreased somewhat

[Bug bootstrap/70473] genautomata memory footprint for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Aug 26 10:23:20 2016 New Revision: 239772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239772&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/70473: Reduce size of Cortex-A8 automaton

[Bug c++/77388] Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/77389] New: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/template-params-12f.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-times DIE \\\\([^\\n]*\\\\) DW_TAG_template_value_param ...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77389 Bug ID: 77389 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/template-params-12f.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-times DIE ([^\\n]*) DW_TAG_template_value_param ... Product: gcc

[Bug c++/77386] Explicit constructor is allowed causing ambiguous initialization call when it shouldn't be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77386 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug middle-end/64971] [5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37433.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/64395] void_t doesn't work as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug middle-end/64971] [5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37433.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971 --- Comment #19 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Aug 26 09:37:20 2016 New Revision: 239770 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239770&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64][GCC 5] Backport Work around for PR target/64971

[Bug c++/77388] Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 Michał Fita changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michal.fita at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- I can reproduce the Ada build failure for ada/exp_atag.o

[Bug c++/77388] New: Reference to a packed structure member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77388 Bug ID: 77388 Summary: Reference to a packed structure member Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug gcov-profile/77378] [7 Regression] tree-profile and libgcov assume long long atomic operations are supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77378 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/77387] -Wstrict-overflow pessimizes VRP in some cases for ABS_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77387 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77361] sparc - unrecognizable insn in __fixsfdi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77361 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|