[Bug go/77780] Go front-end ignores NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL

2016-10-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- My inclination would be to overhaul all the identifiers in the gofrontend to rationalize them from the rather random collection they are now.

[Bug middle-end/77816] [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- It looks like it was working with r240644 . https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-09/msg02880.html

[Bug middle-end/77816] [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug middle-end/77816] New: [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816 Bug ID: 77816 Summary: [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on aarch64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/77780] Go front-end ignores NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL

2016-10-01 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||assemble-failure --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/59650] Inefficient vector assignment code

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59650 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this has been improved already but I don't have a build for x86 to test on.

[Bug target/77800] Undefined ref to host_detect_local_cpu on netbsd/arm

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77800 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Severity|minor

[Bug c++/77803] [7 Regression] Bogus implicit-fallthrough warning

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77803 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Version|unknown

[Bug c++/77815] New: access to destructor via decltype-specifier

2016-10-01 Thread jeff.mirwaisi at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77815 Bug ID: 77815 Summary: access to destructor via decltype-specifier Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/77808] [7 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77808 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/77390] generates INDIRECT_REF of void type

2016-10-01 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390 --- Comment #2 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Dear Dominique, I don't think that the problems are connected. I am having a problem with a vtable that gets generated in a submodule and so has an address different from that in the

[Bug libgcc/77813] __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g | |nu

[Bug libfortran/77473] New PRNG causes regressions on DragonFly BSD

2016-10-01 Thread rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473 --- Comment #4 from Rimvydas (RJ) --- Yes it is an issue in gthr-posix.h how presence of pthread is checked on DragonFly. libc contains pthread_cancel() stub and it is strange why we detected failures only now on testsuite after new PRNG in

[Bug libfortran/77473] New PRNG causes regressions on DragonFly BSD

2016-10-01 Thread rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473 --- Comment #3 from Rimvydas (RJ) --- Created attachment 39730 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39730=edit possible variant to use libc internal status variable On DragonFly libpthread always brings libc so __isthreaded is

[Bug libfortran/77473] New PRNG causes regressions on DragonFly BSD

2016-10-01 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #0) > Created attachment 39550 [details] > changes to tests > > Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-dragonfly4.7 > > r239356 Replace KISS PRNG with

[Bug libfortran/77473] New PRNG causes regressions on DragonFly BSD

2016-10-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77390] generates INDIRECT_REF of void type

2016-10-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77798] [7 Regression] 465.tonto ICE with trunk with -O2

2016-10-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Sat Oct 1 14:34:18 2016 New Revision: 240696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240696=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-01 Richard Biener PR middle-end/77798

[Bug libfortran/77663] libgfortran/caf/single.c: three minor problems and a lost token

2016-10-01 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663 --- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sat Oct 1 14:00:57 2016 New Revision: 240695 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240695=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-10-01 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

2016-10-01 Thread n8tm at aol dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 --- Comment #11 from n8tm at aol dot com --- I returned to attempts to build trunk on win8.1. Initial bootstrap of c++ is failing, attempting (unsuccessfully!) to build eh_arm. I filed pr 77814

[Bug libstdc++/77814] New: build fails trying to build eh_arm

2016-10-01 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77814 Bug ID: 77814 Summary: build fails trying to build eh_arm Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libfortran/77663] libgfortran/caf/single.c: three minor problems and a lost token

2016-10-01 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libfortran/77663] libgfortran/caf/single.c: four minor problems

2016-10-01 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663 --- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi David, what SW did you use to find this? #1, #2, #4 are covered by a patch I am doing at the moment. I believe that the report for #3 is at least misleading. Because when the associated

[Bug libfortran/77663] libgfortran/caf/single.c: four minor problems

2016-10-01 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71767] Endless stream of warnings when using GCC with -Wa,-q and Clang Integrated Assembler

2016-10-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767 --- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Two other tests needing to replace 'L' with '\[lL\]': gcc.dg/const-uniq-1.c gcc.target/i386/pr70799-1.c

[Bug fortran/77596] [F03] procedure pointer with implicit interface in type pointing to a function can be 'called'

2016-10-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77596 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/77813] __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-10-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 39728 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39728=edit optimization patch that shows the issue

[Bug libgcc/77813] New: __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-10-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813 Bug ID: 77813 Summary: __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug target/77756] __get_cpuid() returns wrong values for level 7 (extended features)

2016-10-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Yale Zhang from comment #12) > What's the purpose of subleaf? Is it to distinguish the capabilities of > different cores in a heterogeneous chip (e.g. ARM big-little)? No, it is just a value in

[Bug c++/77812] [5/6/7 Regression] incorrectly rejects valid C++ code that uses enum in template instantiation

2016-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|