https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
My inclination would be to overhaul all the identifiers in the gofrontend to
rationalize them from the rather random collection they are now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
It looks like it was working with r240644 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-09/msg02880.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77816
Bug ID: 77816
Summary: [7 Regression] lots of fortran tests fail on
aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59650
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has been improved already but I don't have a build for x86 to test
on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77815
Bug ID: 77815
Summary: access to destructor via decltype-specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390
--- Comment #2 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Dear Dominique,
I don't think that the problems are connected. I am having a problem
with a vtable that gets generated in a submodule and so has an address
different from that in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g |
|nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473
--- Comment #4 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
Yes it is an issue in gthr-posix.h how presence of pthread is checked on
DragonFly.
libc contains pthread_cancel() stub and it is strange why we detected failures
only now on testsuite after new PRNG in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473
--- Comment #3 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
Created attachment 39730
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39730=edit
possible variant to use libc internal status variable
On DragonFly libpthread always brings libc so __isthreaded is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #0)
> Created attachment 39550 [details]
> changes to tests
>
> Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-dragonfly4.7
>
> r239356 Replace KISS PRNG with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Oct 1 14:34:18 2016
New Revision: 240696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240696=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-10-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sat Oct 1 14:00:57 2016
New Revision: 240695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240695=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-01 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593
--- Comment #11 from n8tm at aol dot com ---
I returned to attempts to build trunk on win8.1. Initial bootstrap of
c++ is failing, attempting (unsuccessfully!) to build eh_arm. I filed
pr 77814
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77814
Bug ID: 77814
Summary: build fails trying to build eh_arm
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
--- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi David,
what SW did you use to find this?
#1, #2, #4 are covered by a patch I am doing at the moment.
I believe that the report for #3 is at least misleading. Because when the
associated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Two other tests needing to replace 'L' with '\[lL\]':
gcc.dg/const-uniq-1.c
gcc.target/i386/pr70799-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77596
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 39728
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39728=edit
optimization patch that shows the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813
Bug ID: 77813
Summary: __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Yale Zhang from comment #12)
> What's the purpose of subleaf? Is it to distinguish the capabilities of
> different cores in a heterogeneous chip (e.g. ARM big-little)?
No, it is just a value in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77812
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
30 matches
Mail list logo