https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77966
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Oct 24 07:00:53 2016
New Revision: 241463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not disable aggressive loop opts for
PR sanitizer/77966
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77966
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, with the patch applied (r241463), you should be given expected output.
Please combine that with -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error and the binary will
be instrumented as desired in #c4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78089
Bug ID: 78089
Summary: __builtin_shuffle parsing bug
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #54 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
>
> --- Comment #53 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> And presumably walking forward/backward from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090
Bug ID: 78090
Summary: [x86_64]: GCC allows integer register for inter unit
conversion under -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_conversions .
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
I believe the testcase is simply abusing b_c_p. Can you elaborate on the
"as-if" rule here?
Note we drop all b_c_p to true/false in the first VRP pass (after inlining),
so a less agressive fix would be to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Oct 24 08:07:27 2016
New Revision: 241464
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241464&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Work around 32-bit i386 STV testcases failing with -mstackrealign (PR
target/77
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084
--- Comment #3 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org ---
gcc-6.2 is fine as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703
Pierre de Buyl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla at pdebuyl dot be
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091
Bug ID: 78091
Summary: i386: Register allocation failure with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78069
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78070
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
There are many possibilities to enhance testing - for example including
non-default langauges or running the testsuite for available multilibs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |5.4.0
Target Milestone|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
-fomit-frame-pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
I will have a closer look but I think this is an almost exact dup of c++/77563
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer ---
Although I have to admit, the error variable could be a bit nicer, rejecting
the register variable definition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 71620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 39875
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39875&action=edit
patch
In both cases we fail because unaligned loads (or stores) are not supported.
Indeed while the testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092
Bug ID: 78092
Summary: ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdsandiford at googlemail dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It is supposed to be vectorized on targets w/o V4QImode support.
> Not sure if the list of targets that FAIL the testcase would be smaller
> if I change the scan to an explicit list of targets (x86)?
Not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
>
> --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > It is supposed to be vectorized on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c (revision 241466)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c (working copy)
@@ -592,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 60040, which changed state.
Bug 60040 Summary: AVR: error: unable to find a register to spill in class
'POINTER_REGS'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 24 10:31:03 2016
New Revision: 241467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/78076
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78093
Bug ID: 78093
Summary: [avr] Introduce new variable attribute "absdata" to
enable LDS / STS on Reduced Tiny
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78093
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78094
Bug ID: 78094
Summary: limit in mask targets
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77982
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78093
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Oct 24 11:02:51 2016
New Revision: 241468
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/78093
* doc/extend.texi (AVR Variable Attr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ---
I see my patch has been applied upstream. Thanks for that.
It would be really great if it could be imported into the gcc tree for the
GCC 7 release, either before stage 1 closes or, release managers permitti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 70673, which changed state.
Bug 70673 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with
allocatable character scalars
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth ---
This issue is also observed on x86_64-apple-darwin14 using gcc 6.2.0 and the
linker from Xcode 7.2.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77985
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 24 11:57:27 2016
New Revision: 241473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-24 Ximin Luo
PR debug/77985
* dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78013
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:14:52 2016
New Revision: 241474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-24 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/61420
PR fortran/78013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:14:52 2016
New Revision: 241474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-24 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/61420
PR fortran/7801
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The change occurred between revisions r213007 (2014-07-24, compiles) and
r213805 (2014-08-11, ICE), likely r213079 (PRs 57305, 61881, and 61888).
Backtrace with r241433 is
* thread #1: tid = 0xd87554,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth ---
Opened radar://28914335 'linker crash when linking temacs from emacs 25.1 when
built with FSF gcc 6.2.0 or gcc trunk' with standalone test case attached as
reproducer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77934
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
--- Comment #11 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:46:44 2016
New Revision: 241476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cross-port the latest resolution of LWG2756 and some
bug-fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77727
--- Comment #5 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:46:44 2016
New Revision: 241476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cross-port the latest resolution of LWG2756 and some
bug-fixes t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
--- Comment #12 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:52:31 2016
New Revision: 241477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2016-10-24 Ville Voutilainen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77727
--- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:52:31 2016
New Revision: 241477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2016-10-24 Ville Voutilainen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77495
Bug 77495 depends on bug 77288, which changed state.
Bug 77288 Summary: Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is
broken in gcc 6.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
[...]
> I suppose XFAILing / providing alternat scan-dump for [!] vect_hw_misalign
> will fix this.
>
> Can you test the attached?
Both tests no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78095
Bug ID: 78095
Summary: [7 Regression] valgrind build error on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 24 12:58:20 2016
New Revision: 241478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-24 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/71491
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> Rainer, please confirm the fix commited on trunk when you have time.
Sure: I had it in my tree during this weekend's bootstraps and all
failu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78061
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn ---
The AIX failures are fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77495
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
Bug ID: 78096
Summary: gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Eric from comment #2)
> so I have to switch on gcc version 5 or 6
> with incompatible ABI change in the C++ library ?
>
> nice ;-)
No need to switch the ABI, you can use the old one jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
--- Comment #2 from Eric ---
so I have to switch on gcc version 5 or 6
with incompatible ABI change in the C++ library ?
nice ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
--- Comment #4 from Eric ---
anyway the link is not consistent
what can I do in order to remove any system gcc + libs
to provide ONLY the gcc we compiled to our cluster users ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
This question should be asked on the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org list.
Bugzilla is the wrong place for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78088
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096
--- Comment #6 from Eric ---
same problem with gcc/6.2.0
/exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libstdc++.so
/exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libitm.so
links to /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
/exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libasan.so
/exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/liblsan.so
/exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78097
Bug ID: 78097
Summary: gcc-6.2.0 inconsistent libgcc_s.so link
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78097
--- Comment #1 from Eric ---
oops of course
find /exe/gcc/4.9.4 -type l -name \*.so | xargs ldd | grep libgcc_s.so
should be read
find /exe/gcc/6.0.2 -type l -name \*.so | xargs ldd | grep libgcc_s.so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78097
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Those libraries should not be using -R. But I doubt they are. I suspect
something else is funny here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098
Bug ID: 78098
Summary: error: interrupt service routine can't be called
directly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78095
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 24 16:45:51 2016
New Revision: 241487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241487&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR71337 fix filesystem::temp_directory_path error handling
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78053
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Assignee|una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77735
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #16 from v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77735
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Oct 24 16:53:20 2016
New Revision: 241489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77735 - FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61376
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61337
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
GCC correctly identified that foo1 == foo2 and generate a tail call.
But we don't want tail call in interrupt handler. On the other hand,
there is no need to have 2 identical copies of an interrupt handler.
There
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth ---
The Apple developers think this is gcc bug producing malformatted input to the
linker. From macho_relocatable_file.cpp, we are triggering the linker check...
#ifndef NDEBUG
// scan for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
fixed on trunk so far.
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo