[Bug sanitizer/77966] Corrupt function with -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc

2016-10-24 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77966 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Oct 24 07:00:53 2016 New Revision: 241463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241463&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not disable aggressive loop opts for PR sanitizer/77966

[Bug sanitizer/77966] Corrupt function with -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc

2016-10-24 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77966 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- Ok, with the patch applied (r241463), you should be given expected output. Please combine that with -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error and the binary will be instrumented as desired in #c4.

[Bug c++/78089] New: __builtin_shuffle parsing bug

2016-10-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78089 Bug ID: 78089 Summary: __builtin_shuffle parsing bug Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assigne

[Bug c++/78089] __builtin_shuffle parsing bug

2016-10-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78089 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/65752] Too strong optimizations int -> pointer casts

2016-10-24 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752 --- Comment #54 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752 > > --- Comment #53 from Jeffrey A. Law --- > And presumably walking forward/backward from

[Bug rtl-optimization/78090] New: [x86_64]: GCC allows integer register for inter unit conversion under -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_conversions .

2016-10-24 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090 Bug ID: 78090 Summary: [x86_64]: GCC allows integer register for inter unit conversion under -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_conversions . Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: U

[Bug tree-optimization/72785] [7 Regression] kernel build error since r236831

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- I believe the testcase is simply abusing b_c_p. Can you elaborate on the "as-if" rule here? Note we drop all b_c_p to true/false in the first VRP pass (after inlining), so a less agressive fix would be to

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

2016-10-24 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Mon Oct 24 08:07:27 2016 New Revision: 241464 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241464&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Work around 32-bit i386 STV testcases failing with -mstackrealign (PR target/77

[Bug target/78084] gcc miscompiles vec_vsx_ld on -O3

2016-10-24 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084 --- Comment #3 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- gcc-6.2 is fine as well.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78090] [x86_64]: GCC allows integer register for inter unit conversion under -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_conversions .

2016-10-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/71703] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1488

2016-10-24 Thread bugzilla at pdebuyl dot be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703 Pierre de Buyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla at pdebuyl dot be --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

2016-10-24 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78091] New: i386: Register allocation failure with -Os

2016-10-24 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091 Bug ID: 78091 Summary: i386: Register allocation failure with -Os Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug regression/78069] [7 Regression] -fprofile-update=atomic warning

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78069 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug web/78070] Suggestion for improvement for patch submission criteria

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78070 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- There are many possibilities to enhance testing - for example including non-default langauges or running the testsuite for available multilibs.

[Bug tree-optimization/78076] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/78084] [7 Regression] gcc miscompiles vec_vsx_ld on -O3

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |7.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/78084] gcc miscompiles vec_vsx_ld on -O3

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |5.4.0 Target Milestone|7.0

[Bug lto/78087] gcc 6.2.0 fails to link temacs from emacs-25.1 with -O0 -flto

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78091] i386: Register allocation failure with -Os

2016-10-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- -fomit-frame-pointer

[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated

2016-10-24 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- I will have a closer look but I think this is an almost exact dup of c++/77563

[Bug target/78091] i386: Register allocation failure with -Os

2016-10-24 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78091] i386: Register allocation failure with -Os

2016-10-24 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78091 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- Although I have to admit, the error variable could be a bit nicer, rejecting the register variable definition.

[Bug tree-optimization/71620] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-45.c FAILs

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71620 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/71491] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 71620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug testsuite/71491] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 39875 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39875&action=edit patch In both cases we fail because unaligned loads (or stores) are not supported. Indeed while the testcases

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

2016-10-24 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed |Ad

[Bug fortran/78092] New: ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

2016-10-24 Thread holysword at inbox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 Bug ID: 78092 Summary: ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

2016-10-24 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug rtl-optimization/78090] [x86_64]: GCC allows integer register for inter unit conversion under -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_conversions .

2016-10-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdsandiford at googlemail dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

2016-10-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou --- > It is supposed to be vectorized on targets w/o V4QImode support. > Not sure if the list of targets that FAIL the testcase would be smaller > if I change the scan to an explicit list of targets (x86)? Not

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

2016-10-24 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 > > --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou --- > > It is supposed to be vectorized on t

[Bug tree-optimization/78076] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307

2016-10-24 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/78076] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c === --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c (revision 241466) +++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-split.c (working copy) @@ -592,7

[Bug tree-optimization/78076] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/56183] [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation

2016-10-24 Thread saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183 Bug 56183 depends on bug 60040, which changed state. Bug 60040 Summary: AVR: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug other/60040] AVR: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

2016-10-24 Thread saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78076] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 24 10:31:03 2016 New Revision: 241467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241467&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-10-24 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/78076

[Bug tree-optimization/78076] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value @ tree-vect-loop.c:2307

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78076 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78084] gcc miscompiles vec_vsx_ld on -O3

2016-10-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78093] New: [avr] Introduce new variable attribute "absdata" to enable LDS / STS on Reduced Tiny

2016-10-24 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78093 Bug ID: 78093 Summary: [avr] Introduce new variable attribute "absdata" to enable LDS / STS on Reduced Tiny Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/78093] [avr] Introduce new variable attribute "absdata" to enable LDS / STS on Reduced Tiny

2016-10-24 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78093 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/78094] New: limit in mask targets

2016-10-24 Thread ikozhukhov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78094 Bug ID: 78094 Summary: limit in mask targets Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assigne

[Bug sanitizer/77982] deadlock in asan thread initialization/interception.

2016-10-24 Thread m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77982 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com --- Com

[Bug target/78093] [avr] Introduce new variable attribute "absdata" to enable LDS / STS on Reduced Tiny

2016-10-24 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78093 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Oct 24 11:02:51 2016 New Revision: 241468 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241468&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/78093 * doc/extend.texi (AVR Variable Attr

[Bug target/68945] enable libcilkrts on SPARC

2016-10-24 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth --- I see my patch has been applied upstream. Thanks for that. It would be really great if it could be imported into the gcc tree for the GCC 7 release, either before stage 1 closes or, release managers permitti

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

2016-10-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 70673, which changed state. Bug 70673 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/70673] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

2016-10-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/78077] gcc 6.2.0 fails to link temacs from emacs-25.1 using the Xcode 8 linker

2016-10-24 Thread howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth --- This issue is also observed on x86_64-apple-darwin14 using gcc 6.2.0 and the linker from Xcode 7.2.1.

[Bug debug/77985] DW_AT_comp_dir is omitted when filename is absolute and the file does not contain a specific typedef

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77985 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 24 11:57:27 2016 New Revision: 241473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241473&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-10-24 Ximin Luo PR debug/77985 * dwarf2out.c

[Bug debug/77985] DW_AT_comp_dir is omitted when filename is absolute and the file does not contain a specific typedef

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77985 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78013] unexpected 'has no IMPLICIT type' error for a type-bound function returning a procedure pointer

2016-10-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78013 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 24 12:14:52 2016 New Revision: 241474 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241474&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-10-24 Paul Thomas PR fortran/61420 PR fortran/78013

[Bug fortran/61420] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] type-bound procedure returning a procedure pointer fails to compile

2016-10-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 24 12:14:52 2016 New Revision: 241474 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241474&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-10-24 Paul Thomas PR fortran/61420 PR fortran/7801

[Bug fortran/61420] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] type-bound procedure returning a procedure pointer fails to compile

2016-10-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

2016-10-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The change occurred between revisions r213007 (2014-07-24, compiles) and r213805 (2014-08-11, ICE), likely r213079 (PRs 57305, 61881, and 61888). Backtrace with r241433 is * thread #1: tid = 0xd87554,

[Bug target/78077] gcc 6.2.0 fails to link temacs from emacs-25.1 using the Xcode 8 linker

2016-10-24 Thread howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth --- Opened radar://28914335 'linker crash when linking temacs from emacs 25.1 when built with FSF gcc 6.2.0 or gcc trunk' with standalone test case attached as reproducer.

[Bug target/77934] pattern for mtvsrdd needs to use b constraint not r

2016-10-24 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77934 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

2016-10-24 Thread ville at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 --- Comment #11 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Oct 24 12:46:44 2016 New Revision: 241476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241476&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Cross-port the latest resolution of LWG2756 and some bug-fixes

[Bug libstdc++/77727] Unwrapping std::optional constructor is not working for non-transferable object

2016-10-24 Thread ville at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77727 --- Comment #5 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Oct 24 12:46:44 2016 New Revision: 241476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241476&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Cross-port the latest resolution of LWG2756 and some bug-fixes t

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

2016-10-24 Thread ville at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 --- Comment #12 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Oct 24 12:52:31 2016 New Revision: 241477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241477&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline: 2016-10-24 Ville Voutilainen

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

2016-10-24 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77727] Unwrapping std::optional constructor is not working for non-transferable object

2016-10-24 Thread ville at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77727 --- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Oct 24 12:52:31 2016 New Revision: 241477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241477&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline: 2016-10-24 Ville Voutilainen

[Bug libstdc++/77495] optional assignment from {} acts weirdly

2016-10-24 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77495 Bug 77495 depends on bug 77288, which changed state. Bug 77288 Summary: Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/71491] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

2016-10-24 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- [...] > I suppose XFAILing / providing alternat scan-dump for [!] vect_hw_misalign > will fix this. > > Can you test the attached? Both tests no

[Bug target/78095] New: [7 Regression] valgrind build error on ppc64le

2016-10-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78095 Bug ID: 78095 Summary: [7 Regression] valgrind build error on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targ

[Bug testsuite/71491] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 24 12:58:20 2016 New Revision: 241478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-10-24 Richard Biener PR testsuite/71491 * gcc.

[Bug testsuite/71491] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78095] [7 Regression] valgrind build error on ppc64le

2016-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78095 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libfortran/78055] [7 regression] Many new gfortran test failures

2016-10-24 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78055 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Rainer, please confirm the fix commited on trunk when you have time. Sure: I had it in my tree during this weekend's bootstraps and all failu

[Bug tree-optimization/78061] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "Error: definition in block 117 does not dominate use in block 164"

2016-10-24 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78061 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug libfortran/78055] [7 regression] Many new gfortran test failures

2016-10-24 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78055 --- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn --- The AIX failures are fixed.

[Bug libstdc++/77495] optional assignment from {} acts weirdly

2016-10-24 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77495 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/78096] New: gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread edeveaud at pasteur dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 Bug ID: 78096 Summary: gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/78096] gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Eric from comment #2) > so I have to switch on gcc version 5 or 6 > with incompatible ABI change in the C++ library ? > > nice ;-) No need to switch the ABI, you can use the old one jus

[Bug other/78096] gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread edeveaud at pasteur dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 --- Comment #2 from Eric --- so I have to switch on gcc version 5 or 6 with incompatible ABI change in the C++ library ? nice ;-)

[Bug other/78096] gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/78096] gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread edeveaud at pasteur dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 --- Comment #4 from Eric --- anyway the link is not consistent what can I do in order to remove any system gcc + libs to provide ONLY the gcc we compiled to our cluster users ?

[Bug tree-optimization/78060] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "error: type mismatch in binary expression"

2016-10-24 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug other/78096] gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- This question should be asked on the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org list. Bugzilla is the wrong place for it.

[Bug tree-optimization/78088] [7 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

2016-10-24 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78088 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug other/78096] gcc-4.9.4 make bootstrap libgcc_s.so link problem

2016-10-24 Thread edeveaud at pasteur dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78096 --- Comment #6 from Eric --- same problem with gcc/6.2.0 /exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libstdc++.so /exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libitm.so links to /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 /exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libasan.so /exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/liblsan.so /exe/gcc/6.2.0/lib64/libci

[Bug other/78097] New: gcc-6.2.0 inconsistent libgcc_s.so link

2016-10-24 Thread edeveaud at pasteur dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78097 Bug ID: 78097 Summary: gcc-6.2.0 inconsistent libgcc_s.so link Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/78097] gcc-6.2.0 inconsistent libgcc_s.so link

2016-10-24 Thread edeveaud at pasteur dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78097 --- Comment #1 from Eric --- oops of course find /exe/gcc/4.9.4 -type l -name \*.so | xargs ldd | grep libgcc_s.so should be read find /exe/gcc/6.0.2 -type l -name \*.so | xargs ldd | grep libgcc_s.so

[Bug other/78097] gcc-6.2.0 inconsistent libgcc_s.so link

2016-10-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78097 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Those libraries should not be using -R. But I doubt they are. I suspect something else is funny here.

[Bug target/78098] New: error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

2016-10-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 Bug ID: 78098 Summary: error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/78095] [7 Regression] valgrind build error on ppc64le

2016-10-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78095 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|U

[Bug libstdc++/71337] temp_directory_path(error_code&) shouldn't throw from !exists(p) || !is_directory(p)

2016-10-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Oct 24 16:45:51 2016 New Revision: 241487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR71337 fix filesystem::temp_directory_path error handling PR li

[Bug fortran/78053] [OOP] SELECT TYPE on CLASS(*) component for deferred length char arrays ICEs for -O > 0

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78053 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from ve

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

2016-10-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Component|t

[Bug fortran/43366] [OOP][F08] Intrinsic assign to polymorphic variable

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/51864] [OOP] ALLOCATE with polymorphic array constructor as SOURCE=

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee|una

[Bug middle-end/77735] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c (test for warnings, line 358)

2016-10-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77735 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57117] [OOP] ICE for sourced allocation of a polymorphic entity using TRANSPOSE

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #16 from v

[Bug middle-end/77735] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c (test for warnings, line 358)

2016-10-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77735 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Oct 24 16:53:20 2016 New Revision: 241489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241489&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/77735 - FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c gcc/

[Bug fortran/61376] Error using private statement in polymorphic derived type

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61376 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/61337] Wrong indexing and runtime crash with unlimited polymorphic array.

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61337 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

2016-10-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- GCC correctly identified that foo1 == foo2 and generate a tail call. But we don't want tail call in interrupt handler. On the other hand, there is no need to have 2 identical copies of an interrupt handler. There

[Bug fortran/72770] [7 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:263

2016-10-24 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/78077] gcc 6.2.0 fails to link temacs from emacs-25.1 using the Xcode 8 linker

2016-10-24 Thread howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78077 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth --- The Apple developers think this is gcc bug producing malformatted input to the linker. From macho_relocatable_file.cpp, we are triggering the linker check... #ifndef NDEBUG // scan for

[Bug libstdc++/71337] temp_directory_path(error_code&) shouldn't throw from !exists(p) || !is_directory(p)

2016-10-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- fixed on trunk so far.

  1   2   >