https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78168
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Huber ---
My configure command line:
configure --target=powerpc-rtems4.12 --verbose --with-newlib
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-nls --disable-lto --disable-plugin
--enable-languages=c
Should also work with a ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78168
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Most likely a dup of bug 78029.
I am not sure. I get the ICE with the latest GCC which includes the fix for bug
78029.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78170
Bug ID: 78170
Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
inux-gnu-gcc --version
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc (crosstool-NG crosstool-ng-1.22.0-201-g11cb2dd)
7.0.0 20161030 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78168
Bug ID: 78168
Summary: [7 Regression] Second ICE in maybe_record_trace_start,
at dwarf2cfi.c:2285
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490
Bug 71490 depends on bug 71915, which changed state.
Bug 71915 Summary: A missed opportunity for SLSR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71915
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71915
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Oct 31 03:04:59 2016
New Revision: 241695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-10-30 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/71915
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71915
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Oct 31 03:04:59 2016
New Revision: 241695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-10-30 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/71915
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167
Bug ID: 78167
Summary: experimental/filesystem calls behave differently
between Linux gcc 5.3.0 and Windows Visual Studio 2015
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
I believe the posted code is neither conforming nor nonconforming.
It has found a defect in the Fortran 2008 standard. The code can
be written as
subroutine co_assoc
implicit none
integer, parameter :: p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78123
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Oct 30 22:14:01 2016
New Revision: 241691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-30 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/78123
* io/tra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78166
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 39925
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39925&action=edit
Preprocessed source
/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/6/cc1 -fpreprocessed hash.i -quiet -dumpbase hash.c
-auxbas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78166
Bug ID: 78166
Summary: [6 Regression] hash.c:1887:1: error: unrecognizable
insn
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78123
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-10/msg00253.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78165
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78165
Bug ID: 78165
Summary: avoid printing type suffix for constants in %E output
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Pedro80 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtlroom at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #10 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 30 18:28:33 2016
New Revision: 241690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-30 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Incorrect |[6 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 30 17:48:27 2016
New Revision: 241689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/67219
* arith.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78164
Bug ID: 78164
Summary: SLP vectorizer: prologue cost biased by redundancies
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78123
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
This looks quite good. Will see if it passes a regression-test.
Index: arith.c
===
--- arith.c (Revision 241590)
+++ arith.c (Arbeitsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #12 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
The crash in gdb looks like stack overflow (unsurprising if there are 1MB
frames). Does increasing thread stack size or reducing frame size (there must
something very big on the stack) help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78158
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
With -O0 there is huge potential for ODR violations. E.g. code contains:
401774: e8 f3 06 00 00 callq 401e6c
::operator bool() const>
If some other non-instrumented library contains a non-in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78158
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78162
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78123
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Lauss ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #2)
>
> > I've run into this issue with current gcc-6-branch while building for
> > example qt-5.7. gcc-5-branch can build t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #2)
> I've run into this issue with current gcc-6-branch while building for
> example qt-5.7. gcc-5-branch can build this source just fine:
__builtin_clzs and __builtin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Works for me too. Without feedback this PR will be closed as WORKSFORME.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62191
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
vector(4) int _4;
_4 = x_1(D) >> 31;
_5 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(_4);
_6 = _5 >> 31;
(lshiftrt (ashiftrt X N) 31) is just (lshiftrt X 31)
The scalar case is handled in combine, probably by simplify_shift_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Manuel Lauss changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78163
Bug ID: 78163
Summary: ref-qualified function type incorrectly accepted in
function parameter type
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61899
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
44 matches
Mail list logo
