[Bug c++/78334] [7 Regression] [C++1z] P0127R2 related ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334 --- Comment #4 from Anatoliy Tomilov --- Now I see it. My mistake.

[Bug c++/78334] [7 Regression] [C++1z] P0127R2 related ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Anatoliy Tomilov from comment #2) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > markus@x4 /tmp % cat lam.ii > > template auto constexpr_string([](auto) {}); > > void foo() {

[Bug c++/78334] [7 Regression] [C++1z] P0127R2 related ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334 --- Comment #2 from Anatoliy Tomilov --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > markus@x4 /tmp % cat lam.ii > template auto constexpr_string([](auto) {}); > void foo() { constexpr_string<0>(0); }; > > markus@x4 /tmp % clang++ -c

[Bug c++/78334] [7 Regression] [C++1z] P0127R2 related ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/56840] a.out aborts instead of catching exception with -flto and -static-libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Nov 13 06:51:23 2016 New Revision: 242348 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242348=gcc=rev Log: DR 374 - specialization in outer namespace PR c++/56840 *

[Bug c++/78334] New: unpacking constexpr char array as template parameters list inside constexpr lambda failed when passed as auto non-type template parameter

const (& value)[size] >` template parameter pack for variable template. I.e. the problem triggered namely by `auto const &` template non-type parameter. Version: 7.0.0 20161112 System type: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Command line: $ g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra -v -I/usr/local/boost-1.62.0/inc

[Bug ipa/78333] New: Intrinsics lack no_instrument_function attribute and thus breaks -finstrument-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333 Bug ID: 78333 Summary: Intrinsics lack no_instrument_function attribute and thus breaks -finstrument-functions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/60952] [F03] Problem using "end" as a type bound procedure and contained procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment #3 regtests cleanly. Will commit as obvious.

[Bug fortran/60952] [F03] Problem using "end" as a type bound procedure and contained procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/60952] [F03] Problem using "end" as a type bound procedure and contained procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60952 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Problem using "end" as a|[F03] Problem using "end"

[Bug middle-end/78225] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/pr27573.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78225 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/43366] [OOP][F08] Intrinsic assign to polymorphic variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/67631] brace initialization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67631 --- Comment #3 from Paul Dreik --- This is still present in trunk, rev 242335 g++-trunk (GCC) 7.0.0 20161112 (experimental)

[Bug fortran/45516] [F08] allocatable compontents of recursive type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45516 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from

[Bug target/77957] [5/6 Regression] Undefined .LCTOC0 with -fstack-protector-strong -mminimal-toc -O0 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] Undefined |[5/6 Regression] Undefined

[Bug target/77957] [6/7 Regression] Undefined .LCTOC0 with -fstack-protector-strong -mminimal-toc -O0 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Sat Nov 12 15:13:14 2016 New Revision: 242336 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242336=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Don't forget to initialize the TOC (PR77957) The code generating

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It might make sense to add -fuse-ld=bfd to the AM_CXXFLAGS for now. (lld is also broken.)

[Bug c++/67631] brace initialization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67631 Paul Dreik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at pauldreik dot se --- Comment #2

C optimization bug? Os optimized away useless (and expensive) call, O3 didn't. significant runtime difference

(i'm new here, i don't know the norms, if i'm doing it all wrong, sorry) tested on gcc 6.2.0 and 5.4.0, amd64, same results. code: http://paste.debian.net/plain/894930 in here, method1 is significantly slower than the others, and called twice in the loop. i believe that Os (correctly) concluded

[Bug rtl-optimization/78232] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr48124-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78232 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/64735] std::future broken on armel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/77501] [F03] ICE in gfc_match_generic, at fortran/decl.c:9429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77501 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/77501] [F03] ICE in gfc_match_generic, at fortran/decl.c:9429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77501 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sat Nov 12 09:25:47 2016 New Revision: 242335 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242335=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-12 Janus Weil PR fortran/77501

[Bug target/78227] ICE: unrecognizable insn: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 with -mavx512bw and vector comare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78227 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78332] New: [ARM] Negative costs of ivopts groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78332 Bug ID: 78332 Summary: [ARM] Negative costs of ivopts groups Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78331] Misleading error message from submodule when module has no module procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at sourceryinstitute dot or

[Bug fortran/77903] gfortran 6.1.0/7.0.0 accept invalid code with conflicting module/submodule interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78331] Misleading error message from submodule when module has no module procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78331] New: Misleading error message from submodule when module has no module procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78331 Bug ID: 78331 Summary: Misleading error message from submodule when module has no module procedures. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: