https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:01:47 2016
New Revision: 242998
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242998&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78586
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (format_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, m.ostapenko at samsung dot com wrote:
>
> > /home/max/src/glibc/resolv/ns_print.c:99: undefined reference to
> > `__stack_chk_gu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha ---
Well, it's not over. W/ the same patched gcc from #comment4 I still see this:
% cat ygkelvbv.c
unsigned int ao, gl;
void
ri (void)
{
for (;;)
{
if (ao != 1)
ao /= 0;
gl = 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 40197
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40197&action=edit
Fix
Right.
Attached patch fixes build error (perhaps all sparc stuff should go upstream,
because I think we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78590
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:24:59 2016
New Revision: 242999
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242999&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Don't mess with subregs of floating point (PR78590)
PR7859
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78590
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Comment #7 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Confirmed fixed for all source files in which I'd seen the problem. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
Bug ID: 78608
Summary: gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: negation
of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type
'long int'
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:41:26 2016
New Revision: 243000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
simplify-rtx: Add missing line for previous commit (PR78583)
The co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78609
Bug ID: 78609
Summary: invalid member's visibility detection in constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78609
--- Comment #1 from Fedor Bobkov ---
To walk around this bug just change visibility of "data" member to public.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78584
--- Comment #7 from Marcel Böhme ---
My system parameters:
KERNEL VERSION: Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.19.0-59-generic x86_64)
GLIBC: Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.9
FILE SYSTEM: ext4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78597
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
760 static inline cp_token *
761 cp_lexer_previous_token (cp_lexer *lexer)
762 {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I also hit:
gcc/real.c:2890:25: runtime error: left shift of negative value -125
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Do you have a test-case (not necessarily reduced) that I can use for testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For example:
markus@x4 ~ % cat bench.ii
struct A {
enum { __value };
};
template _OI __copy_move_a2(_II, _OI);
template void copy(_II, _II, _OI p3) {
__copy_move_a2(0, p3);
}
struct B {
templat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78595
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
While I'm at it, I'll move the constraint to the return type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Nov 30 09:26:51 2016
New Revision: 243003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support nested functions (PR sanitizer/78541).
PR sanitizer/78541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78599
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40198
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40198&action=edit
untested patch to check if type is integral or pointer type.
Hi,
Well, this seems to happen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 ~ % cat real.ii
class A {
int N;
static const int D = 1 << 31;
int &m_fn1() const;
};
int &A::m_fn1() const { int a((double)N / D); }
markus@x4 ~ % UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1
/var
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Nov 30 09:50:04 2016
New Revision: 243005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243005&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/78592
* int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78587
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That one is an unrelated bug as well, nothing to do with combine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414
ycn65201 at noicd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ycn65201 at noicd dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78356
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, for neglecting the paper work over fixing bugs and implementing new
features ;-)
|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On current trunk ...
gcc version 7.0.0 20161130 (experimental) [trunk revision 243005] (GCC)
... the ICE is gone and gfortran gives the following output on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342
--- Comment #9 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> That one is an unrelated bug as well, nothing to do with combine.
I've filed PR78610 for that one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Bug ID: 78610
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at
cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic
block)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Nov 30 11:08:37 2016
New Revision: 243008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/lto/
PR lto/78562
* lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436
--- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Or reload_completed || lra_in_progress, or punt on pseudos in the predicate.
I think these patterns can be generated during the expand of inlined memcpy
oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> > Or reload_completed || lra_in_progress, or punt on pseudos in the predicate.
>
> I think these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78561
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02900.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78601
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
Bug ID: 78611
Summary: -march=native makes code 3x slower
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Maybe the match_parallel predicate ought to also check that you have more than
4 loads, so that it doesn't match anything that could also be handled by
ldmstm.md.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38822
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
AFAICS everthing is fixed here. Can we close this PR?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lachnitt ---
Created attachment 40200
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40200&action=edit
Smaller test case
Here is a smaller test case, which runs for a second only, not hours.
without -march=native:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
It's hard to guess what happens, esp. w/o optimization the difference should
be minimal.
It would be nice if you can isolate the difference to a specific architecture
flag rather than native (-march=core-av
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Can't reproduce (with the small testcase) and -march=native on
fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush
dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78362
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:18:47 2016
New Revision: 243011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/78362: Make sure to only take REGNO of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--- Comment #4 from Jan Lachnitt ---
Small test case with -march=core-avx-i:
real0m1.300s
user0m1.296s
sys 0m0.000s
I.e., reproduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:22:55 2016
New Revision: 243012
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243012&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix part of PR78555 - gcc/real.c:2890:25: runtime error: left shi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:31:07 2016
New Revision: 243014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78532
* sanitizer_common/saniti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78612
Bug ID: 78612
Summary: Invalid double returned from if statement containing
NEON division
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #9 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:32:55 2016
New Revision: 243016
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243016&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add PR sanitizer/78532 patch to libsanitizer/LOCAL_PATCHES.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ondrej, which version is this a regression against?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40201
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40201&action=edit
gcc7-pr78586-2.patch
Ok, attaching a patch for the minor nits listed above.
The far more important thing is th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Another testcase for sreal.c
markus@x4 ~ % cat test.ii
struct A {
A();
A(const A &);
};
struct B {
B(int);
};
template struct C {
B super_t;
C(Predicate p1, int) : super_t(0), m_predicate(p1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78612
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Note that GCC 4.5 is no longer maintained, please try GCC 5 or later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Nov 30 13:23:17 2016
New Revision: 243020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/78593
* pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78362
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> A similar issue can be seen with IPA cloning. It's more rare, because it's
> triggered only with warnings that are issued late, after IPA transforms
> (note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78613
Bug ID: 78613
Summary: [6/7 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't
resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `.Ltext0' {.text
section}
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78612
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40202|0 |1
is obsolete|
ther/obj-early-lto-debug-g/gcc"
.LASF1:
.string ""
.LASF0:
.string "GNU GIMPLE 7.0.0 20161130 (experimental) [trunk revision
221942] -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -g
-fmath-errno -fsigned-zeros -ftrapping-math -fno-trapv -fno-strict-ov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78612
--- Comment #3 from Kudakov ---
I tried compile with gcc 4.9.3 - all output is valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78612
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78574
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:41:09 2016
New Revision: 243026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243026&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78574
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:47:01 2016
New Revision: 243028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
ira: Don't substitute into TRAP_IF insns (PR78610)
In the testcase,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-09-03 00:00:00 |2016-11-30
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:50:43 2016
New Revision: 243030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libiberty: avoid reading past end of buffer in strndup/xstrndup (PR c/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Bug ID: 78614
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE error: invalid rtl sharing found in
the insn (verify_rtx_sharing) gcc/emit-rtl.c:2743
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:54:43 2016
New Revision: 243031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo in testcase name
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c/78498
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Or reproducible via a cross-compiler:
$ ../configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--enable-valgrind-annotations --prefix=/home/marxin/bin/gcc3 --disable-multilib
--disable-libsanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even for TYPE_PRECISION (dirtype) == TYPE_PRECISION (argtype), if one is signed
and the other is unsigned, are you sure that for VR_RANGE we do the right
thing?
Again, should be backed out by sufficient tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78615
Bug ID: 78615
Summary: error: cannot decrement a pointer to incomplete type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78615
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.0, 6.2.0
Known to fail|
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
