https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> (In reply to amker from comment #6)
> > Ok, in this case I need to check idx_step is negative if it's signed type;
> > or idx_step has sign bit if it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78338
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > -z bndplt is needed to call external functions with bounds. But
> > it isn't needed for internal function calls.
>
> That do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78338
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, according to
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gcc-7&arch=mips
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78699
Bug ID: 78699
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
(memory-hog)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78338
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to amker from comment #6)
> Ok, in this case I need to check idx_step is negative if it's signed type;
> or idx_step has sign bit if it's unsigned type (negative step in effect).
> tree_int_cst_sgn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> (In reply to amker from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > > neg_step is true, because DR_STEP (dr_a.dr) is (ssizetype) -8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to amker from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > neg_step is true, because DR_STEP (dr_a.dr) is (ssizetype) -8.
> > But idx_step is 0xUL.
> > Note
> > tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Richard, this doesn't look like error recovery to me. No error is reported and
the sorry isn't meant to be produced for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784
Christian Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cb at cebix dot net
--- Comment #9 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> neg_step is true, because DR_STEP (dr_a.dr) is (ssizetype) -8.
> But idx_step is 0xUL.
> Note
> tree_int_cst_compare (idx_step, size_zer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78658
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78698
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78698
Bug ID: 78698
Summary: [7 regression] Using static PIC libgc fails when it
has dependencies
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
So, perhaps:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 08f5f9e52ef2..f430af97fdf1 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ cp_lexer_previous_token (cp_lexer *lex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Dec 6 13:41:46 2016
New Revision: 243300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-12-06 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78686
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697
Bug ID: 78697
Summary: --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to
be per multilib
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Markus Tri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andyg1001 at hotmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I don't have a box with 3dnow, but the assembly for -m32 -O2 -m3dnow -mno-sse
> pr42549.c looks identical on x86_64-linux between gcc 6 and tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
I'm planning to run SPEC benchmarks late this week to find a proper value for
the new predictor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ncopa at alpinelinux dot org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77975
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Can't reproduce on trunk or GCC 6 branch. What options are required?
You need to use an -fsanitize=undefined instrumented compiler.
No options required.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77639
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77907
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77581
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77482
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The g/G handling looks indeed totally broken, not just for the > 10 precisions,
even for %.9g it assumes it will be in between 11 and 13 characters, which is
of course wrong.
But even generally, for all float
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> From looking at the testcase, I think it is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-none-linux-gnu |*-*-*
--- Comment #2 from James Green
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
Vidya Praveen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78442
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From looking at the testcase, I think it is solely SRA that can help here, if
it manages to scalarize everything, we are good, if not, you get terrible code.
The classes are huge and largely uninitialized, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> Sth orthogonal to -Og, -fkeep-vars-live=N with some level, default
> to N > 0 for -Og maybe.
>
> Of course it will likely pessimize code as I don't see how w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
Bug ID: 78696
Summary: [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng
where N is greater than 10
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> If -Og does not force user variables/paramete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #10 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> Created attachment 40217 [details]
> predict
>
> Hi,
> here is patch adding the polymorphic case, too.
>
> Honza
Looks good - gap still improves by 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If -Og does not force user variables/parameters to stack nor forces an
artificial use of the var at the end of their scope, then it will always
happen, the rest is purely best effort, see if the var value can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
-multilib
Thread model: single
gcc version 7.0.0 20161206 (experimental) [master revision
c59a180:88a522b:8c1527e8f37c8e80912aa3a465d623381aaa41e0] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I cannot reproduce with that revision.
Again, how do you configure your gcc.
What is the output of arm-eabi-gcc -v that you built?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Bug ID: 78695
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78691
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce on an arm-none-eabi compiler built with RTL checking. Do
> you pass any particular --with-arch/cpu/fpu/float options?
I built an arm-eabi-gcc usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |preprocessor
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
This isn't how preprocessing works I think (thus INVALID)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 6 10:35:37 2016
New Revision: 243289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78548
* tree-ssa-uninit.c (simplify_preds_4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 6 10:33:41 2016
New Revision: 243288
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243288&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78566
* tree-ssa-uninit.c (can_one_predicat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78690
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #2 from
101 - 200 of 218 matches
Mail list logo