https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
The latest version r243504 still build fail.
The version r241773 can build successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #14 from Damian Rouson ---
Hi Paul,
Based on comment #12, I assume you no longer believe that type guarding is
required. If I misinterpreted comment #12, please let me know. Otherwise,
please let me know what in the standard indicat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Dec 11 23:37:17 2016
New Revision: 243534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-12-11 Bill Schmidt
PR target/78695
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78606
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #12)
> Created attachment 40305 [details]
> Patch for the PR
>
> That attachment appears to fix the testcases of comments #6 and #9. This
> check of comment #6 runs OK:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Under Preferences/Email Preferences, you can select "Disable All Mail",
which should work and keep you from getting unwanted mail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8)
> (In reply to janus from comment #5)
> >
> > module object_interface
> > type :: object
> > contains
> > procedure :: write_formatted
> > gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9)
> Created attachment 40302 [details]
> A workaround for the PR (even a patch?)
>
> The attached allows this testcase to run as intended:
True, your patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
Daniel Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.black at au dot ibm.com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78624
Daniel Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|-Wformat-length/-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-12-26 00:00:00 |2016-12-11
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Ko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
Work around installed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00967.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16519
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Dec 11 19:24:46 2016
New Revision: 243532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, PPC] Fix PR71496 by marking pic base loads as non-copyable.
The Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47754
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70799
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Dec 11 18:59:07 2016
New Revision: 243530
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243530&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70799
* config/i386/i386.c (dimode_scala
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29651
--- Comment #11 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #10)
> Is there anything left to fix?
>
> A dump with recent trunk shows
>
>integer(kind=4) D.3468;
>
> D.3468 = (integer(kind=4)) status2;
> _gfortran_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78637
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78637
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Dec 11 18:15:31 2016
New Revision: 243529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-12-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/78637
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-07-18 00:00:00 |2016-12-11
--- Comment #16 from Thomas K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771
Bug ID: 78771
Summary: Internal compiler error when using inherited
constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78672
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 40304
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40304&action=edit
Results with the new patch.
Results with patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00120.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50542
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-06-22 00:00:00 |2016-12-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50538
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-06-22 00:00:00 |2016-12-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29651
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch under test:
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Now we have a blocking version for the library, do
> you think we still need blocking in the front end?
See comment 1. See also pr68600.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70118
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Dec 11 16:27:08 2016
New Revision: 243527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70118
* config/i386/mmintrin.h (__m64_u)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Dec 11 16:23:04 2016
New Revision: 243526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Back-port fix for PR67710.
gcc/
2016-12-11 Iain Sandoe
model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20161211 (experimental) [trunk revision 243523] (GCC)
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Dec 11 16:10:48 2016
New Revision: 243525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Back-port fix for PR57438.
gcc/
2016-12-11 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #56 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Dec 11 16:01:35 2016
New Revision: 243524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Back-port fix for PR71767.
gcc/
2016-12-11 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #19)
> Created attachment 40286 [details]
> Failing testcases with -flto under Darwin
>
> The PR is fixed under Linux but gives a link error under Darwin with -flto.
> Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #20)
> Created attachment 40303 [details]
> Assembly for char_result_16 with -flto on darwin
It appears that two identical entries are present:
.section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 40303
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40303&action=edit
Assembly for char_result_16 with -flto on darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 40302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40302&action=edit
A workaround for the PR (even a patch?)
The attached allows this testcase to run as intended:
! { dg-do run }
!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78770
Bug ID: 78770
Summary: error: 'bar' was not declared in this scope. note:
suggested alternative: 'bar'
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
48 matches
Mail list logo
