https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78519
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78519
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 15 04:35:31 2016
New Revision: 243684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78519 - missing warning for sprintf %s with null pointer
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|7.0 |
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 15 03:08:14 2016
New Revision: 243683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78774 - [6/7 Regression] ICE in constexpr string literals and templ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10)
> testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78213.c often times out:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78213.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78213.c -fself-test (test for warnings,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Dec 15 01:47:48 2016
New Revision: 243681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce selftest::locate_file
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818
Bug ID: 78818
Summary: msp430 persistent attribute is not applied correctly
in some cases
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Extension / variation of the test case:
programread_exp_data
implicit none
type experimental_data_t
character(len=:), dimension(:), allocatable :: header
end type
type(expe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763
--- Comment #6 from Jiri Danek ---
I can reproduce this on OpenSuse Tumbleweed (in Docker)
$ docker run --rm -it jdanekrh/gcc-78763-opensuse make
]...]
[ 66%] Built target reactor_send_cpp
Scanning dependencies of target go-build
# qpid.apache
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
#13 from Bill Schmidt ---
The new test case fails on the GCC 6.3 release candidate for
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu:
spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/wschmidt/g
cc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg
#8 from Bill Schmidt ---
The new test case fails on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu in the GCC 6.3 RC:
spawn /home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/wschmidt/gcc/build/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-6.3.0-RC-20161214/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78540.c
-fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78786
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Dec 14 21:58:19 2016
New Revision: 243672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78786 - GCC hangs/out of memory calling sprintf with large
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 14 21:39:51 2016
New Revision: 243671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78791
* config/i386/i386.h (enum ix86_stack_slot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
--- Comment #3 from Charles ---
Thanks; didn't find that ticket before I submitted the bug. Validated that the
error does not occur on a fresh gcc-6-branch checkout.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #8)
> Thanks that looks good. I will test it when I have a chance. I am changing
> the Qt sources to not assume the presence of __builtin_clzs when __BMI__ is
> defined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817
Bug ID: 78817
Summary: stage2 bootstrap failure in vec.h:1613:5: error:
argument 1 null where non-null expected after r243661
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The above patch also reintroduces reintroduces __builtin_clzs and
__builtin_ctzs to mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 14 20:41:43 2016
New Revision: 243669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72775
* init.c (perform_member_init): Diagnose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 14 20:27:06 2016
New Revision: 243668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59874
* config/i386/i386-builtin.def: A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
--- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool ---
powerpc64-linux, even.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
I do apologise, it seems that Mr Reid did not do his usual update. We
will have to work from the draft standard itself.
Paul
On 14 December 2016 at 20:36, paul.richard.thomas at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 14 19:40:05 2016
New Revision: 243662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243662&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/77844
* valtrack.c: Include rtl-iter.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Janus,
Yes there is one - I had it open but somehow provided the link to the
wrong one...
Paul
On 14 December 2016 at 19:20, janus at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
> I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr
> with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf
This document descri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> +1
>
> Can you remind us which F15 features we have already?
>
> On https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News I see:
> * Support for IMPLICIT NONE (external, type).
> * ERRO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78816
Bug ID: 78816
Summary: [c++14] Static auto variable usage in generic/variadic
lambda fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> In the general case we can't print the correct value, because we may not be
> able to increment the 'current' member to point to the object that would
> resul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78673
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually I'm not sure what can be done to fix this.
In the general case we can't print the correct value, because we may not be
able to increment the 'current' member to point to the object that would resu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Dec 14 17:23:06 2016
New Revision: 243660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78701
* pt.c (type_unification_real): Check tsubs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Dec 14 17:23:16 2016
New Revision: 243661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/78673 - sprintf missing attribute nonnull on destination argument
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78673
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Dec 14 17:23:16 2016
New Revision: 243661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/78673 - sprintf missing attribute nonnull on destination argument
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
This concerns several files from testsuite/gfortran.dg :
goacc/default_none.f95
goacc/kernels-alias-4.f95
goacc/kernels-loop-2.f95
goacc/kernels-loop-data-2.f95
goacc/kernels-loop-data-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78815
Bug ID: 78815
Summary: ICE: segfault with -fopenmp -fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78814
Bug ID: 78814
Summary: ICE in symbol_rank, at fortran/interface.c:1265
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77553
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charles.frasch at gmail dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Dec 14 16:45:33 2016
New Revision: 243657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78701
* pt.c (type_unification_real): Check tsubs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69481
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Dec 14 16:43:07 2016
New Revision: 243656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69481
* cp-tree.h (TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO_MAYBE_ALIA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78813
Bug ID: 78813
Summary: constexpr function returns wrong value
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
Bug ID: 78812
Summary: Wrong code generation due to hoisting memory load
across function call
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #8 from James Greenhalgh ---
Is anyone currently looking at this?
If the bug is still blocked on correcting the profile information (which sounds
like a large job), should we consider weakening or reverting the cost model for
GCC 7?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
Bounty available!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to uros from comment #9)
> Author: uros
> Date: Wed Dec 14 15:44:07 2016
> New Revision: 243651
This patch reintroduces __builtin_clzs and __builtin_ctzs to gcc-6 branch to
resolve compatibility iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01272.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Started somewhere between 243555 and 243578.
Requires -mcpu=power7 or lower. Works with -mcpu=power8.
Possibly r243578 combine.c change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77830
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40324|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Dec 14 15:44:07 2016
New Revision: 243651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59874
* config/i386/i386.c (enum ix86_bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
Bug ID: 78811
Summary: [7 Regression] raw-string-6.c testsuite failure
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 40339 [details]
> gcc7-pr78791.patch
>
> Untested fix. I don't see other easy fix than not reusing temporaries
> between those from the expansi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77933
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 14 15:17:57 2016
New Revision: 243650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make printers detect invalid debug mode iterators
PR libstdc++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78804
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78810
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2016-12-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78810
Bug ID: 78810
Summary: [7 Regression] Optimized out volatile memory access
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40338
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40338&action=edit
gcc7-pr78757.patch
The following untested patch fixes the ICE for me, but whether it is right,
dunno...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
--- Comment #2 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> We may have dups of this. And we now have inlining for strcmp/memcmp when
> the
> result is only compared against zero.
I don't see that happening wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
Bug ID: 78809
Summary: Inline strcmp with small constant strings
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: midd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So the bug is that nothing has gimplified th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So the bug is that nothing has gimplified the MAX_EXPR in:
character(kind=1)[1:MAX_EXPR <_1, 0>] * pstr.0;
struct FRAME.MAIN__ FRAME.3;
character(kind=1)[1:30] * s;
integer(kind=4) _1;
integer(kind=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40337
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40337&action=edit
Let's try that again ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
--- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, the bug is in the arm backend.
I posted a patch to fix it at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00849.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> "print it" should not automatically dereference.
The Python code that registers the printers for iterators even says:
# These shouldn't be necessar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan ---
Created attachment 40335
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40335&action=edit
compiled with -fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #2 from Steven Noonan ---
Created attachment 40334
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40334&action=edit
compiled without -fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
--- Comment #1 from Steven Noonan ---
Created attachment 40333
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40333&action=edit
test.c - test case for target_clones with(out) -fopenmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808
Bug ID: 78808
Summary: target_clones not applying to openmp functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
