[Bug fortran/60913] [OOP] Memory leak with allocatable polymorphic function result (in type-bound operator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60913 Ian Harvey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian_harvey at bigpond dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/79257] spurious -Wformat-overflow=1 warning with -O2 and sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The null pointer instrumentation added by the sanitizer causes GCC trouble. We've seen it with the original implementation of the -Wnonnull warning, it still causes null warnings out of builtin-ssa-sprintf.c

[Bug ada/25844] [5/6/7 regression] ICE on overloaded renames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org

[Bug target/79038] Improve PowerPC ISA 3.0 conversion between integers and hardware _Float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40611 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40611=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem. This patch is believed to fix the following PRs * target/79038

[Bug target/79203] Update PowerPC double->int conversions to know about -mvsx-small-integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79203 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40610 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40610=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem. This patch is believed to fix the following PRs * target/79038

[Bug target/79202] On Power8, consider using vupkhsw/xxpermdi to sign extend an int in a vector register instead of mfvsrwz/mtvsrwa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79202 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40609 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40609=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem. This patch is believed to fix the following PRs * target/79038

[Bug testsuite/63256] [5/6/7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-8.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS succeeded" 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256 --- Comment #11 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is my patch to clean this one up: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01524.html Basically this reverses the patches to sms-8 that were posted for 47013 here:

[Bug target/77333] Incorrect stack adjust in epilogue when targeting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333 --- Comment #15 from Tony Kelman --- Created attachment 40608 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40608=edit smaller copy of SLPVectorizer.cpp that reproduces issue

[Bug target/77333] Incorrect stack adjust in epilogue when targeting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333 --- Comment #14 from Tony Kelman --- I'll look into whether the same flag changes the behavior in the same way on gcc 5. Using the opensuse repo's current cross compiler version, I reduced SLPVectorizer.cpp down to the attached version. It's

[Bug target/79261] New: vec_xxpermdi appears to have endian issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79261 Bug ID: 79261 Summary: vec_xxpermdi appears to have endian issues Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/79232] [7 Regression] error: invalid rhs for gimple memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40607 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40607=edit gcc7-pr79232.patch This patch (totally untested) implements it and fixes the ICE with both the original reduced

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] Run time error: malloc on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 40606 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40606=edit Reduced test case

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] Run time error: malloc on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter --- Here is the promised reduced test case, 80 lines, and I do believe that this is most likely causing the issues of all our 250 failing tests (hopefully). Attached and plain: module module1 implicit none

[Bug c++/79232] [7 Regression] error: invalid rhs for gimple memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though the #c1 testcase actually tests something even different (the #c5 questions apply otherwise), because there is the [d], therefore it really should be evaluated in the order: side-effects in e,

[Bug fortran/79229] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1 with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79229 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug plugins/79260] New: missing header files for plugins: arm-isa.h, arm-flags.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79260 Bug ID: 79260 Summary: missing header files for plugins: arm-isa.h, arm-flags.h Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 --- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner --- I totally agree, especially since the work in progress patch we did have to fix the glibc build had so much fallout.

[Bug c++/79232] [7 Regression] error: invalid rhs for gimple memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the C++, the question really is what C++17 wants with comma expression on the lhs used as lvalue and what should be done for C++14 and earlier. Shouldn't COMPOUND_EXPR be handled like before for

[Bug target/78516] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_assign for e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71374] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2190

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71374 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/71910] ICE on valid OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/79194] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79194 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/79194] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79194 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Jan 27 19:40:44 2017 New Revision: 244993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244993=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Bernd Schmidt PR rtl-optimization/79194

[Bug fortran/71014] associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to disable default private attribute for inner loop indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/72744] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72744 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69281] gfortran ICE on temporary array in function call with -fstack-arrays -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/67496] trans-array.c sanitizer runtime error: load of value 124, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70530] [DR2468] You should probably add addressof (a) != addressof (b) check to std::swap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70530 Askar Safin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79257] spurious -Wformat-overflow=1 warning with -O2 and sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/79131] [7 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213, big-endian ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79131] [7 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213, big-endian ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131 --- Comment #9 from Arnd Bergmann --- I successfully rebuilt all the (now seven) previously failing kernel configurations, no more ICE. Thanks a lot!

[Bug c++/79258] -Wduplicated-branches false positive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/77333] Incorrect stack adjust in epilogue when targeting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-w64-mingw32

[Bug rtl-optimization/71374] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2190

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71374 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Jan 27 18:08:14 2017 New Revision: 244991 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244991=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug libstdc++/70530] [DR2468] You should probably add addressof (a) != addressof (b) check to std::swap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70530 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- If you think there's still a problem please show a concrete example where our current implementation of std::swap causes a problem.

[Bug libstdc++/70530] [DR2468] You should probably add addressof (a) != addressof (b) check to std::swap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70530 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Askar Safin from comment #5) > 4. But (as it seems for me) the standard nowhere says that std::swap (a, a) > is unspecified. So, it should be specified It's specified to do: T tmp =

[Bug gcov-profile/79259] [7 Regression] Corrupted profile when one uses -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79259 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2017-1-27 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug gcov-profile/79259] New: [7 Regression] Corrupted profile when one uses -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79259 Bug ID: 79259 Summary: [7 Regression] Corrupted profile when one uses -O1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 --- Comment #9 from James Greenhalgh --- > I'm curious how that benchmarks for you (with -ftree-loop-distribution vs. > without). Taking trunk as 100%, I see a 2% gain on trunk with -fno-tree-loop-distribution-patterns , and 1% gain with your

[Bug libstdc++/70530] [DR2468] You should probably add addressof (a) != addressof (b) check to std::swap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70530 Askar Safin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/79131] [7 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213, big-endian ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- I provided the final patch solving all the test cases for the PR. We should wait for an ACK from Arnd or Dominik to close it.

[Bug c++/71290] [6 Regression] Flexible array member is not diagnosed with -pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Jan 27 16:51:54 2017 New Revision: 244990 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244990=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71290 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: *

[Bug target/79131] [7 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213, big-endian ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Jan 27 16:50:11 2017 New Revision: 244989 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244989=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Vladimir Makarov PR target/79131

[Bug c++/78771] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when using inherited constructors (instantiate_template_1 in gcc/cp/pt.c:17391)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 27 16:48:34 2017 New Revision: 244988 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244988=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78771 - ICE with inherited constructor. * call.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/78559] [7 Regression] wrong code due to tree if-conversion?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79258] -Wduplicated-branches false positive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79258 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jan 27 16:17:04 2017 New Revision: 244986 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244986=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/79254 fix exception-safety in std::string::operator= PR

[Bug testsuite/65484] FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr36648.cc on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65484 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/65484] FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr36648.cc on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65484 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Jan 27 15:59:02 2017 New Revision: 244985 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244985=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Bill Schmidt PR target/65484

[Bug c++/79258] New: -Wduplicated-branches false positive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79258 Bug ID: 79258 Summary: -Wduplicated-branches false positive? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/79257] New: spurious -Wformat-overflow=1 warning with -O2 and sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79257 Bug ID: 79257 Summary: spurious -Wformat-overflow=1 warning with -O2 and sanitizer Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/79250] brig/brigfrontend/brig-to-generic.cc: two small problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79250 Pekka Jääskeläinen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pekka.jaaskelainen@parmance

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- So there's ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN (x86_field_alignment) but the interface is not usable from within get_object_alignment_2 at /* When EXP is an actual memory reference then we can use TYPE_ALIGN

[Bug rtl-optimization/78559] [7 Regression] wrong code due to tree if-conversion?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559 --- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Jan 27 14:42:23 2017 New Revision: 244979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244979=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78559 * combine.c (try_combine):

[Bug tree-optimization/71433] [7 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433 --- Comment #16 from Vincent Lefèvre --- Thanks, I confirm that for r244974, there is no longer any issue on the MPFR code.

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (gdb) p debug_tree (exp) unit size align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x768c2540 precision 64 context pointer_to_this > so the MEM is marked aligned but somehow

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- valgrind tells: ==2361== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ==2361== General Protection Fault ==2361==at 0x8048668: octfapg_universe (pr25413a.c:111) ==2361==by

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 27 13:56:59 2017 New Revision: 244976 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244976=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/79236] [7 Regression] Many libgomp tests fail if configured with --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none but NVidia HW or libcuda.so.1 unavailable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79236 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug preprocessor/79210] "internal compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc" processing -Wformat-signedness warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79199] [7 Regression] ICE with -Wduplicated-branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79199 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 27 13:25:28 2017 New Revision: 244975 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244975=gcc=rev Log: PR c/79199 * c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c: Require

[Bug debug/72828] ICE in clone_tree_partial when compiling with -fdebug-types-section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72828 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71433] [7 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 27 12:30:43 2017 New Revision: 244974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244974=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71433] [7 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/79256] New: [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79256 Bug ID: 79256 Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/79244] [7 Regression] ice in replace_uses_by, at tree-cfg.c:1866

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79244 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 27 12:24:54 2017 New Revision: 244973 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244973=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-27 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/79244] [7 Regression] ice in replace_uses_by, at tree-cfg.c:1866

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79244 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67951] Wshadow for variable with same name as generic (auto) lambda parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67951 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79253] [7 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy starting with r243723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79253 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/79239] [7 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/79239] [7 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239 --- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Fri Jan 27 11:22:30 2017 New Revision: 244965 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244965=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] Fix PR target/79239 - unrecognized insn after pragma gcc pop_options

[Bug target/79211] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 > > > > --- Comment #4 from James

[Bug target/79211] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Ah. That reg:SF 3 is not an fpr_reg_operand (3 is GPR 3). Now how did that happen...

[Bug jit/64089] libgccjit.so.0.0.1 linkage failure on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin14 |x86_64-apple-darwin16

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 > > --- Comment #4 from James Greenhalgh --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug middle-end/78142] Commit r241590 is more registers to be used for on gcc.target/aarch64/vector_initialization_nostack.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78142 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c/79219] Feature request: double width/single width -> single width integer division and remainder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79219 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > So you mean DW/W -> W, but that can result in the result being not > > representable? > > What's the desired

[Bug target/79211] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 --- Comment #4 from James Greenhalgh --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Note the trivial fix will FAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-23.c which looks like > > int i; > for (i = 0; i < 128; ++i) > { > a[i] = a[i] + 1; >

[Bug c++/79232] [7 Regression] error: invalid rhs for gimple memory store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Configured with [ 55s] + ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go

[Bug bootstrap/79255] [7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug bootstrap/79255] New: [7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255 Bug ID: 79255 Summary: [7 Regression] PGO bootstrap fails on x86_64/ppc64le building Ada Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Note the trivial fix will FAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-23.c which looks like int i; for (i = 0; i < 128; ++i) { a[i] = a[i] + 1; b[i] = d[i]; c[i] = a[i] / d[i]; } where the

[Bug tree-optimization/79244] [7 Regression] ice in replace_uses_by, at tree-cfg.c:1866

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79244 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- On branches this is latent wrong-code as we simply do /* Propagate the RHS into every use of the LHS. */ FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, iter, lhs)

[Bug target/79211] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- My cross compiler for x86_64 is configured: ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/home/marxin/bin/gcc2 --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap --target=powerpc64-suse-linux

[Bug tree-optimization/79244] [7 Regression] ice in replace_uses_by, at tree-cfg.c:1866

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79244 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/79245] [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/79254] [5/6/7 Regression] basic_string::operator= isn't exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79254 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Daryl Haresign from comment #6) > I guess you don't want _M_copy_assign to be public, either. Nor inline :-) Avoiding the try-catch like that is an improvement, I'll do that.

[Bug tree-optimization/71433] [7 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Ok, same reason but my "simple" two-predecessor "hack" doesn't get it because we now have three...

[Bug fortran/79165] 100% compile-time increase for polyhedron aermod by r244581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Target Milestone|7.0

  1   2   >