https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80386
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80393
Bug ID: 80393
Summary: class_replaceMethod() can modify the wrong class
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80392
Bug ID: 80392
Summary: ICE with allocatable polymorphic function result in a
procedure pointer component
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36831
--- Comment #7 from mmokrejs at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to mmokrejs from comment #6)
> I am on Gentoo Linux but 5.4.0 is nevertheless still unavailable for general
> ("stable") users. For a good reason. And as I said, the ABI is not
> compatib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80385
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41173
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41173&action=edit
gcc7-pr80385.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80283
--- Comment #13 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks the x64 issue is unrelated. It starts with a bad schedule which could
be improved by the scheduler but that is off by default, while the ARM version
starts with a good schedule which is co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80381
--- Comment #8 from Sven Woop ---
Thanks a lot. Sven
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36831
--- Comment #6 from mmokrejs at gmail dot com ---
I am on Gentoo Linux but 5.4.0 is nevertheless still unavailable for general
("stable") users. For a good reason. And as I said, the ABI is not compatible.
I will try to reproduce this on another h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80391
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
To clarify: I've downloaded his small testcase (which you should have attached
here). And all maintained gcc versions compile it fine. So the bug is fixed
already for gcc-5 and higher.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80391
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to mmokrejs from comment #2)
> Hmm, I cannot due to ABI incopmpatibility.
>
> However, the other reported also showe 5.2.1 was affected as well.
Still too old. gcc-5.4 was released over a ye
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80391
--- Comment #2 from mmokrejs at gmail dot com ---
Hmm, I cannot due to ABI incopmpatibility.
However, the other reported also showe 5.2.1 was affected as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80391
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80385
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80391
Bug ID: 80391
Summary: seamonkey-2.46/mozilla/gfx/2d/DrawTargetTiled.cpp:158:
1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80390
Bug ID: 80390
Summary: std::pair of aligned type gives bogus warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80389
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80389
Bug ID: 80389
Summary: [7 Regression][ARM] -march=armv8-a and
-mcpu=cortex-a57 results in invalid .cpu assembly
directive
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80303
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80381
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 11 08:54:54 2017
New Revision: 246835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80381
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80363
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 11 08:51:40 2017
New Revision: 246834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80363
* error.c (dump_expr): Handle VEC_COND_EXPR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70167
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ---
This has been suggested as a value category checker:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/rXQewIGjI2096UbA
There are two cases in it that print "Bug!" with gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70167
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80345
--- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Apr 11 08:15:51 2017
New Revision: 246833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-02-10 Bin Cheng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
--- Comment #18 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Apr 11 08:15:51 2017
New Revision: 246833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-02-10 Bin Cheng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70878
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I've got patch for that in testing process.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80387
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70878
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|spu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80386
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79390
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #21)
> > On April 7, 2017 6:57:13 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
> > wrote:
> > >https://gcc.gnu.org/bu
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo