Re: gdb doesn't get argc right

* Don Viszneki: > I'm using standard Ubuntu releases of gcc (5.4.0) and gdb (7.11.1) and I > have a very simple to reproduce issue on x86-64. > > I think I've included all the necessary information in this paste: > > https://gist.github.com/hdon/3f96a8a6b67e078e0213660ec6245677 This is likely a l

[Bug tree-optimization/80443] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80443 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCON

[Bug sanitizer/80444] New: -fcompare-debug failures with -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80444 Bug ID: 80444 Summary: -fcompare-debug failures with -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/80445] New: /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 Bug ID: 80445 Summary: /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declaredusing ::gets; Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 --- Comment #1 from Anton Kochkov --- Forgot to mention command line: g++ -c -pipe -m32 -O2 -std=gnu++11 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -W -fPIC -D__IDP__ -D__QT__ -D__EA64__ -D__LINUX__ -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -I. -I../../

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2) > Almost certainly not a gcc bug. QT must be doing something weird like: namespace std { #include }

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 --- Comment #4 from Anton Kochkov --- here is /usr/include/qt5/QtCore/qbytearray.h: #ifndef QBYTEARRAY_H #define QBYTEARRAY_H #include #include #include #include #include #include #include// <-- line 52 #include Seem no namespace

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 --- Comment #5 from Anton Kochkov --- Created attachment 41205 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41205&action=edit preprocessed file output of g++ -c -pipe -m32 -O2 -std=gnu++11 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -W -fPIC -D__IDP__ -D__QT__

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 Anton Kochkov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Anton Kochkov

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cstdio:124:11: error: ‘::gets’ has not been declared using ::gets;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80445 --- Comment #8 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com --- Original message From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" Date: 17/04/2017 12:36 (GMT+00:00) To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/80445] /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/cst

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Bijan Chokoufe from comment #30) `bzip2 -d diff.bz2`) as I have no idea what to look for: > https://cloud.bijancn.de/index.php/s/ta2XMIVWhTUGAvX Thanks. I looked, but didn't find anything...

[Bug target/57202] Please make the intrinsics headers like immintrin.h be usable without compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Walton --- Please forgive my ignorance... What was fixed? The problem statement is/was "Please make all headers for intrinsics be includable without special compiler flags." But it appears the intrinsics are not avail

[Bug fortran/80121] Memory leak with derived-type intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- In trans-decl.c there is a function called 'init_intent_out_dt', which takes care of deallocating the allocatable components of intent(out) derived-type dummies. However, it has a comment saying:

[Bug fortran/80121] Memory leak with derived-type intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > In trans-decl.c there is a function called 'init_intent_out_dt', which takes > care of deallocating the allocatable components of intent(out) derived-type > dum

[Bug other/80434] internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80434 --- Comment #2 from Merri --- 1024 MB

[Bug target/57202] Please make the intrinsics headers like immintrin.h be usable without compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #7) > It appears the intrinsics are not available. They are available for functions compiled for a suitable target, for instance because of -march or thanks to the targ

[Bug libstdc++/80446] New: UNRESOLVED: 18_support/launder/1.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80446 Bug ID: 80446 Summary: UNRESOLVED: 18_support/launder/1.cc compilation failed to produce executable Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: re

[Bug other/80434] internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80434 --- Comment #3 from Merri --- I bumped up the memory and it now works. thank you

[Bug target/57202] Please make the intrinsics headers like immintrin.h be usable without compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey Walton --- On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:04 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202 > > --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #7

[Bug middle-end/66240] RFE: extend -falign-xyz syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240 --- Comment #6 from Denis Vlasenko --- Patches v7 are posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00720.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00721.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00722.html https://gcc.

[Bug target/57202] Please make the intrinsics headers like immintrin.h be usable without compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202 --- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira --- > But that's what this bug report is for - to make the intrinsicsalways available. I never asked for them to be available in undecorated functions. Yes, that's how both the Intel and Microsoft compilers b

[Bug target/80315] Calling __builtin_crypto_vshasigmaw with argument 3 out of range creates an unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80315 --- Comment #7 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Mon Apr 17 16:16:43 2017 New Revision: 246949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246949&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-04-12 Kelvin Nilsen

vn(5): Malesuada Vel Convallis Limited

Hi This email (gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org) was specified as the recipient of the transfer. Find the bill enclosed with this email. Transfer will be posted in 5 hours. File Pwd: WyaSWslP Kindest regards Malesuada Vel Convallis Limited 5.4.52097448.0.65433gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.docx Description: Attac

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #32 from Thomas Koenig --- Running your testsuite on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with a current trunk and "make -k check" gets me PASS: mlm_matching_isr.run but also a few more failures: FAIL: bloch_vectors.run FAIL: processes.run

[Bug c/80441] Spurious Warnings with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80441 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/80346] pessimistic stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80346 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- Interestingly, GCC manages to eliminate the memset at -O1 (and thus avoid warning) but not at -O2: $ gcc -O1 -S -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -fdump-tree-optimized=/dev/stdout ../b.c ;; Function f (f, funcdef_no

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #33 from Thomas Koenig --- > Could you tell me how just to run a single testcase? Well, I figured that one out. Quite interesting, a different error with valgrind: | Events: event normalization mode '1' ==49974== Source and destin

[Bug c/80428] Incorrect -Wunused-const-variable= instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80428 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80440] Slow compile when USEing modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80440 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Apr 17 18:22:03 2017 New Revision: 246952 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246952&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-04-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80440 * module.c (find

[Bug c++/70167] Some const array prvalues are incorrectly treated as lvalues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70167 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/80447] New: Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 Bug ID: 80447 Summary: Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 41208 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41208&action=edit Configuration log

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- Well, not a 7 regression, this is actually an improvement over GCC 6, where we fail during the profile-generate stage...

[Bug libstdc++/54924] Warn for std::string constructor with wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54924 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See A

[Bug c++/80415] [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80415 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 17 19:39:00 2017 New Revision: 246954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246954&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/80415 - wrong error with default arg and array reference.

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/80415] [7 Regression] bogus "invalid initialization of reference" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80415 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > I always use --disable-werror to get past these (harmless) warnings. Is that harmless, though? 18446744073709551608 seems like a lot of zeros. :)

[Bug sanitizer/80386] UBSAN: false positive - constant folding and reassosiation before instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80386 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Babokin --- Any update? This bug makes gcc ubsan implementation almost unusable on any real application.

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #4) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > > I always use --disable-werror to get past these (harmless) warnings. > > Is that harmless, though? 18

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- OK, thanks. I am trying with --disable-werror now, and hopefully that's all there is to it.

[Bug c++/80287] C++ crash with __attribute((may_alias))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Mon Apr 17 20:41:40 2017 New Revision: 246955 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246955&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 017-04-17 Bernd Edlinger PR c++/80287 * class.c (f

[Bug c++/80287] C++ crash with __attribute((may_alias))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- fixed on trunk. It's theoretically possible that gcc-6-branch is also affected, but I have not tried.

[Bug c++/80179] [6/7 Regression] ICE initializing a static local object with flexible array member in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2641

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80179 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80290] [6/7 Regression] g++ uses unreasonable amount of memory compiling nested string maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug bootstrap/80447] Profiled LTO bootstrap fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---