[Bug middle-end/66313] Unsafe factorization of a*b+a*c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313 --- Comment #17 from Dmitry Babokin --- Any chances for the fix for this bug? Looks like this one stands as a last obstacle to claim UBSAN in GCC fully functional. I still see quite a few errors, but looks like all of them are attributed to

[Bug other/80923] New: RTEMS SH ICE building gcc-7.1.0 on FreeBSD 11.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80923 Bug ID: 80923 Summary: RTEMS SH ICE building gcc-7.1.0 on FreeBSD 11.0 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/78603] internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:21846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603 --- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jcmvbkbc Date: Wed May 31 00:05:38 2017 New Revision: 248714 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248714=gcc=rev Log: xtensa: Fix PR target/78603 2017-05-30 Max Filippov

[Bug target/78118] xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 --- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jcmvbkbc Date: Wed May 31 00:05:01 2017 New Revision: 248713 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248713=gcc=rev Log: xtensa: Fix PR target/78118 It started failing after the following

[Bug c++/80916] Spurious "declared 'static' but never defined" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80916 --- Comment #1 from Davin McCall --- (Does not actually require -Wno-invalid-offsetof to reproduce; that was just me copying my command line literally. Problem first appears in GCC 6.1, not in 5.x, still present in 7.1).

[Bug target/78603] internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:21846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603 --- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jcmvbkbc Date: Tue May 30 23:41:58 2017 New Revision: 248708 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248708=gcc=rev Log: xtensa: Fix PR target/78603 2017-05-30 Max Filippov

[Bug c++/80840] [7/8 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument reference to double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80840 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/80850] Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- 236968 OK 248467 Not OK Trying 242717 ...

[Bug testsuite/80557] rewrite absolute line numbers into relative or saved line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80557 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80922] New: #pragma diagnostic ignored not honoured with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80922 Bug ID: 80922 Summary: #pragma diagnostic ignored not honoured with -flto Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/80910] FAIL: gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sys

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80910 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/80910] FAIL: gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sys

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80910 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue May 30 22:00:57 2017 New Revision: 248701 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248701=gcc=rev Log: Test if host compiler supports -std=c++11 in ms-sysv.exp 2017-05-30 Tom de Vries

[Bug c/54202] Overeager warning about freeing non-heap objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Macieira --- ping. If you can't fix GCC so that it can prove that the free is on a non-heap object, then please change the warning to indicate that GCC may be wrong. For example: warning: free() may be called with

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 --- Comment #5 from Tim Shen --- (In reply to Ambroz Bizjak from comment #4) > Oh wait sorry, that doesn't solve it (yet), the variant_storage_byte would > still have a default copy constructor that copies the byte member. Yeah, your solution

[Bug c/80731] poor -Woverflow warnings, missing detail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80731 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 30 21:27:35 2017 New Revision: 248700 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248700=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c/80731 * g++.dg/ext/utf16-4.C: Relax

[Bug c++/80856] [7/8 Regression] ICE from template local overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80856 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 30 21:13:27 2017 New Revision: 248699 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248699=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80856 - ICE with local extern in template * semantics.c

[Bug go/80914] gcc-go binaries don't run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80914 --- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan --- This is from a different go.gcc binary, because I've rebuilt several times to try and troubleshoot. But this one still exhibits the bad behavior. Just in case, I've uploaded a copy of the binary, the entire

[Bug ada/80921] Cross compiling for mingw32 target fails to build Ada shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80921 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 --- Comment #4 from Ambroz Bizjak --- Oh wait sorry, that doesn't solve it (yet), the variant_storage_byte would still have a default copy constructor that copies the byte member.

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 --- Comment #3 from Ambroz Bizjak --- Hey, Does this idea help: https://godbolt.org/g/3Iqp2c ? The storage is an array of "special" byte classes which have empty constructors/assign when those would be implemented by one of the mixins.

[Bug libfortran/80850] Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to DIL from comment #4) > Offset of zero is fine. I have never observed this SegFault before. I ran > the test on multiple machines with GCC/5.3.0, GCC/5.4.0, and GCC/6.3.1. > Also, as I mentioned

[Bug ada/80921] New: Cross compiling for mingw32 target fails to build Ada shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80921 Bug ID: 80921 Summary: Cross compiling for mingw32 target fails to build Ada shared libraries Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/80850] Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- I'm trying for some bisection. I hope this is not going to turn out as complex as PR 79430 ...

[Bug c++/80830] [8 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80892] [8 regression] -Wfloat-conversion now warns about non-floats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80892 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug tree-optimization/80894] [8 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/80856] [7/8 Regression] ICE from template local overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80856 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/80915] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/80893] std::vector creation dereferences null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is actually a problem in vector though: it assumes allocate(0) returns a non-null pointer, which is unspecified. This should fix it: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_bvector.h +++

[Bug bootstrap/80915] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- This may be fixed by r248687.

[Bug target/80833] 32-bit x86 causes store-forwarding stalls for int64_t -> xmm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80833 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue May 30 17:18:25 2017 New Revision: 248691 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248691=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80833 * config/i386/constraints.md (Yd): New

[Bug libstdc++/80893] std::vector creation dereferences null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80893] std::vector creation dereferences null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I can't reproduce this with the default configuration so I assume it's caused by --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=pool (why are you using that?)

[Bug libstdc++/79162] [7 Regression] [C++17] ambiguity in string assignment due to string_view overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm unable to reproduce this with the following, based on the llvm code. GCC does the right thing here, so without a testcase there's nothing we can do. #include template class storage { public:

[Bug bootstrap/80915] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/80915] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Works for me: /data/users/nathans/trunk/obj/x86_64-lto/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/data/users/nathans/trunk/obj/x86_64-lto/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++

[Bug libstdc++/79162] [7 Regression] [C++17] ambiguity in string assignment due to string_view overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Can you reduce the failing code down to something smaller than the entirety of LLVM? Richard also says the overload shouldn't exist and is a bug, but the overload has to exist, because the C++17 draft is

[Bug c++/80920] warnings get position wrong - very confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80920 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug libfortran/80850] Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850 --- Comment #4 from DIL --- Offset of zero is fine. I have never observed this SegFault before. I ran the test on multiple machines with GCC/5.3.0, GCC/5.4.0, and GCC/6.3.1. Also, as I mentioned before, the test passed the VALGRIND check. Would

[Bug c++/80913] [8 regression] Infinite loop in cc1plus with stat hack patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80913] [8 regression] Infinite loop in cc1plus with stat hack patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue May 30 14:43:45 2017 New Revision: 248687 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248687=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80913 * name-lookup.c (add_decl_to_level): Assert not

[Bug bootstrap/80915] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #1) > I cannot reproduce this. an x86_64-linux host using > --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto > > > How exactly is gcc being configured and built? Alternatively, is is

[Bug middle-end/80917] missed bit information propagation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80917 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- For this special case, we could simplify a_6 = a_5(D) + 4; _2 = a_6 & 2; to _2 = a_5(D) & 2; I believe we already have a similar transform with | 4 instead of + 4.

[Bug c++/80920] New: warnings get position wrong - very confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80920 Bug ID: 80920 Summary: warnings get position wrong - very confusing Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/80915] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- I cannot reproduce this. an x86_64-linux host using --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto How exactly is gcc being configured and built? Alternatively, is is possible for a self-contained testcase?

[Bug go/80914] gcc-go binaries don't run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80914 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The failure is in libbacktrace. The program crashes because once libbacktrace fails the first time, the program is trying to use libbacktrace to show a stack trace of the failure. This leads to an

[Bug testsuite/80910] FAIL: gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sys

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80910 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41440 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41440=edit tentative patch

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #18 from Daniel Santos --- > I intended to respond to your comments from 6 days ago sooner, but better late > than never! Again, sorry for the delay No worries at all:

[Bug c++/80913] [8 regression] Infinite loop in cc1plus with stat hack patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- > It doesn't appear to be the stathack patch at fault here. I still get the > infinite loop with my reduced testcase when I revert it. (Which

[Bug c/80116] Warn about macros expanding to multiple statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80116 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/80913] [8 regression] Infinite loop in cc1plus with stat hack patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.12,|i386-pc-solaris2.12,

[Bug libgomp/80822] libgomp incorrect affinity when OMP_PLACES=threads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 30 12:05:30 2017 New Revision: 248683 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248683=gcc=rev Log: PR libgomp/80822 * config/linux/affinity.c

[Bug tree-optimization/80901] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80901 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80919] [7/8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wall when printing address of size 0 array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80919 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/80919] [7/8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wall when printing address of size 0 array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80919 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80919] New: [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wall when printing address of size 0 array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80919 Bug ID: 80919 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wall when printing address of size 0 array Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/80913] [8 regression] Infinite loop in cc1plus with stat hack patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- It doesn't appear to be the stathack patch at fault here. I still get the infinite loop with my reduced testcase when I revert it. (Which is good, because I can't see how that patch could cause this

[Bug tree-optimization/80901] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80901 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 30 11:08:36 2017 New Revision: 248681 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248681=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-30 Richard Biener PR middle-end/80901

[Bug target/78838] msp430 option -mcode-region=either, -ffunction-sections, and interrupt function attributes cause incorrect section to be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78838 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Tue May 30 10:49:29 2017 New Revision: 248674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248674=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78838 gcc * config/msp430/msp430.c (gen_prefix): Return NULL

[Bug fortran/80918] [6/7/8 Regression] Assumed size whole array rejected in depend clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.4

[Bug middle-end/13182] -fstack-check probes too distant when allocating on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > To be clear: x86/Linux and x86-64/Linux (and for them there is no protection > area during the probing). I misremembered: there is exactly one page of protection area for them because of the way the

[Bug fortran/80918] [6/7/8 Regression] Assumed size whole array rejected in depend clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80918] New: [6/7/8 Regression] Assumed size whole array rejected in depend clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80918 Bug ID: 80918 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Assumed size whole array rejected in depend clause Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/13182] -fstack-check probes too distant when allocating on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Right, the Ada runtime uses an alternate signal stack for specific platforms. To be clear: x86/Linux and x86-64/Linux (and for them there is no protection area during the probing).

[Bug gcov-profile/80911] gcov failed: gcno corrupted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80911 --- Comment #17 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Can't confirm that, running trunk@248556 works fine for me. > Utilizing valgrind also does not help. I also had problems reproducing the problem, so I decided to

[Bug middle-end/13182] -fstack-check probes too distant when allocating on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > I'm not sure if the the probing offset is large enough for this purpose > because the kernel keeps pushing more and more data onto the stack during > signal handling: > >

[Bug c++/59457] name mangling in presence of variadic templates seems wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59457 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51322] [C++11] wrong mangling with argument packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||plasmahh at gmx dot net --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/13182] -fstack-check probes too distant when allocating on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182 --- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6) > That's as expected: the probing mechanism maintains a protection area so the > program can recover from a stack overflow condition by raising an exception. >

[Bug fortran/80610] Compiler crashes ungraciously when large static array is initialized with anything other than zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610 --- Comment #17 from Gustavo Hime --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) Dear Jerry, Thank you for the feedback. For the record, I didn't say gfortran is crap, nor did I throw insults at it. At least I didn't mean to. Sorry if you

[Bug middle-end/13182] -fstack-check probes too distant when allocating on stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13182 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/80701] Option for generating link symbol for functions removed by DCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80701 --- Comment #6 from Gustavo Hime --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) Dear Thomas, Thank you for the feedback. Please keep in mind this can easily arise in a shared codebase, sometimes unintentionally. As Dominique pointed out, a

[Bug middle-end/80701] Option for generating link symbol for functions removed by DCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80701 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/80906] [7/8 Regression] ICE in copy_loop_close_phi_args, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2094

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80906 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||70390 --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug libgomp/80394] Empty OpenMP task is wrongly removed when optimizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80394 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/80385] [5/6 Regression] Segfault in commutative_operand_precedence() rtlanal.c:3373

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80385 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80286] [5/6 Regression] AVX2 _mm_cvtsi128_si32 doesn't return a proper 32bits int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80286 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80363] #'vec_cond_expr' not supported by dump_expr#

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80363 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80176] [5/6 Regression] cannot bind reference to static member function using object access expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80176 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/80168] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1311 w/ VLA and -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80141] ICE with pragma omp declare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/80112] [5/6 Regression] ICE in doloop_condition_get at loop-doloop.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80129] wrong code with ternary struct assignment to const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80097] internal compiler error in c_fully_fold_internal with std=c89 and -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80097 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/79944] asan: incorrect instrumentation of atomic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79944 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/80025] [5/6 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (-O3, -Ofast) -g -ftracer (infinite recursion in rtx_equal_for_cselib_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79896] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11950 on non-int128 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79896 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79932] _mm512_packus_epi32 does not compile under -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79932 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/79901] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79901 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79807] [5/6 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79807 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79729] [5/6 Regression] ICE in ix86_print_operand, at config/i386/i386.c:18231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79729 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79641] [5 Regression] ICE with const variable and attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79641 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79570] [5/6 Regression] ICE in sel-sched-ir.c:4534 in pr69956.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79568] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 for pr70325.c (with -mavx512bw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79559] [5/6 Regression] ICE in ix86_print_operand, at config/i386/i386.c:18189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79512] [6 Regression] ICE: Segfault in gimple_build_call_1, at gimple.c:218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79494] [5/6 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79197] [5 Regression] ICE in extract_insn in gcc/recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79396] [5/6 Regression] ICE (verify_flow_info failed) with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 -march=haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79396 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79411] [5 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79411 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   >