https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80993
Bug ID: 80993
Summary: [msp430] __attribute__((interrupt)) should imply
__attribute__((used))
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80986
--- Comment #1 from linzj ---
>From the peek of -fdump-tree-tu-all, the translation unit already get the
function_type wrong. Before use the auto, the function type has the attribute
pcs. But after the auto use, the function type has dropped the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80987
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the problem is here in do_class_deduction in gcc/cp/pt.c:
vec *args;
if (init == NULL_TREE
|| TREE_CODE (init) == TREE_LIST)
args = make_tree_vector_from_list (init);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80992
Bug ID: 80992
Summary: libstdc++ cross-build on solaris is missing
GCC_CHECK_TLS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80718
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Jun 6 22:27:13 2017
New Revision: 248936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248936=gcc=rev
Log:
Back port from mainline
[gcc]
2017-05-19 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jun 6 22:23:07 2017
New Revision: 248935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248935=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #2)
> Try compiling with -fno-frontend-optimize to confirm.
... and if this fixes the problem (assuming it is in foo.f90),
do the following:
$ gfortran -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80975
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jun 6 19:18:37 2017
New Revision: 248932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248932=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/80975
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 41481
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41481=edit
Patch candidate
I'm attaching patch that supports following expansion of -fprofile-dir (or
arguments of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #5 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 18:54:55 2017
New Revision: 248931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248931=gcc=rev
Log:
sparc: Fix stack references in return delay slot.
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #4 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 18:52:22 2017
New Revision: 248930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248930=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/80968
* config/sparc/sparc.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #3 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 18:42:52 2017
New Revision: 248929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248929=gcc=rev
Log:
sparc: Fix stack references in return delay slot.
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79983
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:40:34 2017
New Revision: 248927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248927=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/79983
* c-decl.c (start_struct): Use the location of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Testing this patch:
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -25367,7 +25367,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
int flags,
--cp_unevaluated_operand;
release_tree_vector (args);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
FWIW using -fconcepts and const container doesn't lose the qualifiers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80968
--- Comment #2 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davem
Date: Tue Jun 6 17:02:22 2017
New Revision: 248926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248926=gcc=rev
Log:
sparc: Fix stack references in return delay slot.
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80023
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80991
Bug ID: 80991
Summary: ICE with __is_trivially_constructible in template
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65672
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69502
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Bug ID: 80990
Summary: cv-qualifiers ignored in variable definition using
class template argument deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80987
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jun 6 15:06:56 2017
New Revision: 248922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248922=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/80979
* name-lookup.c (adl_class_only): Don't add visible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80989
Bug ID: 80989
Summary: Incorrect .loc directives in generated assembly code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Bug ID: 80988
Summary: [8 Regression] 171_swim fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80987
Bug ID: 80987
Summary: Existence of a std::initializer_list constructor
breaks deduction guides
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58861
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Fuka ---
Still present in GCC 7.1.1.
Cab bug70231 be related?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt ---
That is the usual approach, and there are already some predicates involving
alignment. It's a matter of going through and figuring out which ones will do
what's needed. I spent some tiresome weeks working
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
Denis Khalikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40963|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 6 12:46:41 2017
New Revision: 248919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248919=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Indeed
Index: gcc/domwalk.c
===
--- gcc/domwalk.c (revision 248914)
+++ gcc/domwalk.c (working copy)
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jun 6 11:30:54 2017
New Revision: 248915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248915=gcc=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/80978
* tree-cfg.c (execute_fixup_cfg): Fix condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985
--- Comment #2 from John Lindgren ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> template
> int call (Func f)
> {
> static int counter;
> f ();
> return ++counter;
> }
Yes, this is a different example in which the warning does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
HJ's tester sees the same ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2017-06/msg00057.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Without --param max-combine-insns=2
alias stmt walking : 10.98 ( 7%) usr 0.13 (12%) sys 11.14 ( 7%) wall
3 kB ( 0%) ggc
dead store elim2: 9.57 ( 6%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 9.57
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Consider:
template
int call (Func f)
{
static int counter;
f ();
return ++counter;
}
void func () noexcept
{
}
Now if call(func) is evaluated in two different translation units, one using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
With --param max-combine-insns=2 compile-time and memory use at -O1 shrinks
considerably for me (still too high IMHO).
-O1 --param max-combine-insns=2: 70.48user 0.63system 1:11.12elapsed 99%CPU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Fuka ---
Still present in GCC 7 and people are complaining
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44385909/adding-to-an-array-of-characters-in-fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is indeed that we change side-band info on "leaders" to sth
optimistic later proved wrong during iteration but we do not undo this setting
(the lattice changes are not undone later but it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SLP vectorization does not |SLP vectorization does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #2 from Markus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 6 07:37:14 2017
New Revision: 248909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248909=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-06-06 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Kugan posted a patch for this, but it was rejected.
Kugan, would you please put a link to your patch in the comments and unassign
yourself (unless you plan to work on this further).
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #16 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #14)
> spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
Assignee|ebotcazou at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80986
Bug ID: 80986
Summary: auto keyword variable lost its attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
74 matches
Mail list logo