https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60063
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jun 18 04:55:02 2017
New Revision: 249347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60063 - -Wunused-local-typedefs and templates.
* d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60063
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jun 18 04:54:37 2017
New Revision: 249346
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249346&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60063 - -Wunused-local-typedefs and templates.
* d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70844
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jun 18 04:25:15 2017
New Revision: 249344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70844 - -Wuseless-cast and inheriting constructor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70844
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jun 18 04:25:15 2017
New Revision: 249344
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249344&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70844 - -Wuseless-cast and inheriting constructor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087
nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41549|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
If the original testcase is compiled with -fsignaling-nans, the signaling
nan is not converted to a quiet nan. Thus, I believe the conversion is
expected.
There might be an issue with the second testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
This seems quite tricky. Conversion changes a signaling nan to a quiet nan:
/* Make resulting NaN value to be qNaN. The caller has the
responsibility to avoid the operation if flag_signaling_nans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2017-06-16, at 9:59 AM, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> is this still an issue ?
I don't know. I haven't used the box for some time. I suspect the bug is
likely fixed.
Dave
--
John Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81120
Bug ID: 81120
Summary: __builtin_nansl ("") generates quiet NaN
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81119
Bug ID: 81119
Summary: gcc 8.0 regression: -Wshadow warns on "typedef struct
foo foo;"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80893
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jun 17 12:11:47 2017
New Revision: 249338
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80893 don't run test for C++98 modes
PR libstdc++/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Problem seems to be between gcc revision 249235 and 249337.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81073
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> The testcase in comment 1 works on trunk and current 7 branch. The original
> testcase looks ill-formed to me; [dcl.constexpr] says that a constexpr
> functio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code:
a[7], b;
c() {
int d, e;
for (; d; d++)
if (a[d])
if (b)
return;
else if (d >= e)
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81118
Bug ID: 81118
Summary: ice in remove_redundant_iv_tests
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
In this case this code will lead to buffer overflows, but in general case it
often may work fine. However this is still error in code, and it would be good
if gcc could detect and report it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
Bug ID: 81117
Summary: Improve buffer overflow checking in strncpy
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
21 matches
Mail list logo
