https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81228
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC, ice-on-valid-code
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jun 28 04:14:32 2017
New Revision: 249719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-27 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55639
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk, will backport to 7 in a few days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jun 28 02:17:40 2017
New Revision: 249718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/80164
* trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix at fontein dot de
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||realloc at outlook dot de
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69111
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81026
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69111
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81160
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Martin or Dominique, in looking at this I am unable to reproduce any failures.
Was this for a specific platform? Mac, PowerPC ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
There actually is some code in find_same_succ_bb to keep loop structure:
...
if (bb == NULL
/* Be conservative with loop structure. It's not evident that this test
is sufficient. Before ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81239
Bug ID: 81239
Summary: std::__cxx11::string& visible in gcc warning output
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81235
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Carl Johnson from comment #0)
> After debugging, I noticed that the crash is because function `realloc`
> returned NULL. As I know, there might be two situations when `realloc`
> returns NULL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81204
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
dup of PR 81026?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81237
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, you are compiling the files with different levels of ABI.
-fabi-version=6 is specified in test.o but not test2.o .
Can you try with the same abi version and try again?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 41642
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41642&action=edit
Patch to add ppc_cpu_supports_hw target support for tests
BTW, the patch attached allows us to check whethe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner ---
Well in theory we could add yet another switch to enable/disable the warning,
but we have too many switches as it is.
Note, I've put a warning in my development version of the target_clones
patches, and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81238
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 41641
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41641&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 21:45:45 2017
New Revision: 249711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Those two changes aren't actually applicable to 5. Sorry for the n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 21:45:45 2017
New Revision: 249711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Those two changes aren't actually applicable to 5. Sorry for the no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69300
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81237
--- Comment #2 from Ravi ---
I noticed I neglected to mention the error message. Compiling the code with GNU
7.1 gives me the error:
test.o:(.data.rel.ro._ZTV1C[_ZTV1C]+0x38): undefined reference to `non-virtual
thunk to C::func() const'
collect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72801
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81238
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81238
Bug ID: 81238
Summary: Target clone support does not make default clone
static.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81237
--- Comment #1 from Ravi ---
The markdown didn't work quite the way I thought it would... Let me know if the
format is unclear and I'll rework the initial message to make it clearer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81237
Bug ID: 81237
Summary: Cannot link when class methods compiled with different
levels of vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236
--- Comment #2 from Guillaume Racicot ---
Created attachment 41640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41640&action=edit
CPP file that trigger the crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Racicot ---
Created attachment 41639
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41639&action=edit
The compiler output crashing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236
Bug ID: 81236
Summary: Crash when calling a template member function from
generic lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81235
Bug ID: 81235
Summary: Realloc returns NULL while ti should not
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81026
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81169
--- Comment #5 from Even Rouault ---
Thanks. Fix confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81234
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic
Known to work|6.3.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #4)
> I think for the problem of using __builtin_cpu_, we should issue a
> warning
> (not a fatal error) if the configured GLIBC is too old saying you need to link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108
--- Comment #10 from Jeff Hammond ---
Thanks for the feedback. I agree that it is a huge amount of work to optimize
this.
For what it's worth, GCC and Clang perform about the same. Unfortunately, I do
not have the means to evaluate IBM XLF, wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:24:51 2017
New Revision: 249707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81225
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187
--- Comment #6 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Tue Jun 27 18:19:03 2017
New Revision: 249706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80187
* include/std/variant (variant::variant, v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45976
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81234
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With schedule(static) or schedule(dynamic) etc. I believe the compiler is not
allowed to do it, at least if it can't prove it won't be observable.
So, if you have
int cnt = 0;
#pragma omp parallel for schedul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81234
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68491
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #9)
> I'm a bit late to the party, but this patch seems dubious to me.
> __get_cpuid_max() fails to distinguish between CPUs that have max level 0
> (although I doubt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818
--- Comment #28 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80966
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80692
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80618
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73650
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:11:01 2017
New Revision: 249700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from trunk:
2016-08-15 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81233
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81234
Bug ID: 81234
Summary: [regression] flexible array member not at end of
‘struct
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68491
--- Comment #10 from Christos Zoulas ---
On Jun 27, 4:26pm, gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org ("luto at kernel dot org") wrote:
-- Subject: [Bug target/68491] libgcc calls __get_cpuid with 0 level breaks o
| I'm a bit late to the party, but this patch s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81233
Bug ID: 81233
Summary: --Wdiscarded-qualifiers and
Wincompatible-pointer-types missing important detail
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68491
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luto at kernel dot org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jun 27 16:23:46 2017
New Revision: 249698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81221 fix namespace qualification for parallel mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jun 27 16:19:16 2017
New Revision: 249697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81221 only run new test for check-parallel
PR libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108
--- Comment #8 from Jeff Hammond ---
I tried with schedule(dynamic) and schedule(static,n) for n=1,8,100. None of
this made a positive difference. Is that expected? I'm happy to make any code
changes that don't break correctness and are still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81229
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r248387.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81232
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193
Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tuliom at linux dot
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jun 27 14:44:50 2017
New Revision: 249692
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249692&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81221 fix namespace qualification for parallel mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81232
Bug ID: 81232
Summary: compiler crashes for template function overload
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53896
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80775
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81058
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The following patch fixes the failures
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpmovswb-1.c
2017-06-08 15:14:40.0 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpmovswb-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81230
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81217
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81231
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81231
Bug ID: 81231
Summary: ICE with invalid argument to __atomic_*
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo