[Bug target/81300] -fpeephole2 breaks __builtin_ia32_sbb_u64, _subborrow_u64 on AMD64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Jul 14 05:30:58 2017 New Revision: 250196 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250196=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-07-10 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/81375] [6/7/8 Regression] unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81375 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Jul 14 05:30:58 2017 New Revision: 250196 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250196=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-07-10 Uros Bizjak

[Bug lto/81440] -Wlto-type-mismatch warning with flexible array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440 --- Comment #1 from Dan Halbert --- *** Bug 81439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug lto/81439] -Wlto-type-mismatch with flexible array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81439 Dan Halbert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81440] New: -Wlto-type-mismatch warning with flexible array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440 Bug ID: 81440 Summary: -Wlto-type-mismatch warning with flexible array in struct Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/81439] New: -Wlto-type-mismatch with flexible array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81439 Bug ID: 81439 Summary: -Wlto-type-mismatch with flexible array in struct Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81438] New: silent bad code generation with computed goto exit from catch block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81438 Bug ID: 81438 Summary: silent bad code generation with computed goto exit from catch block Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks. Now I see that the runtime.lo.dep file that you attached earlier was in fact erroneous. I didn't see that before. It lists "bytes.gox flag.gox fmt.gox go/format.gox io.gox io/ioutil.gox log.gox

[Bug tree-optimization/81437] New: missing -Wstringop-overflow reading past the end of a string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81437 Bug ID: 81437 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow reading past the end of a string Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81436] New: missing -Wstringop-overflow on strncat to a zero-size buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81436 Bug ID: 81436 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow on strncat to a zero-size buffer Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81435] New: missing strlen optimization for strcat past the beginning of clear array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81435 Bug ID: 81435 Summary: missing strlen optimization for strcat past the beginning of clear array Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 Thomas Gereke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at thomasgereke dot de --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 --- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 41754 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41754=edit Assembly output with patch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 --- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 41753 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41753=edit Assembly output without patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/81428] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in build_one_cst, at tree.c:2079 with -O2. Fixed point division.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81428 --- Comment #2 from Jon Beniston --- Thanks Jakub, the patch works for me.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 --- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 41752 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41752=edit Proposed patch to fix scheduler/fusing problem.

[Bug rtl-optimization/81434] New: AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434 Bug ID: 81434 Summary: AArch64 instruction fusing and pipeline scheduling problem Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #5 from martin --- Thanks. I did your suggested steps but it still fails. In comment 4 I attached the ouput of "make -d"?

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #4 from martin --- Created attachment 41751 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41751=edit output of make -d

[Bug target/81294] _subborrow_u64 argument order inconsistent with intrinsic reference, icc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81294 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*|x86 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/79790] [C++17] ICE class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/70988] missing buffer overflow detection in chained strcat calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70988 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/81405] [8 Regression] Buffer overflow when consolidating printing of out-of-order fix-it hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81405 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81405] [8 Regression] Buffer overflow when consolidating printing of out-of-order fix-it hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81405 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Jul 13 19:30:42 2017 New Revision: 250187 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250187=gcc=rev Log: diagnostics: fix crash when consolidating out-of-order fix-it hints (PR c/81405)

[Bug c/81432] Bogus fix-it hints from -Wmissing-braces when there are excess elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81432 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Jul 13 19:30:42 2017 New Revision: 250187 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250187=gcc=rev Log: diagnostics: fix crash when consolidating out-of-order fix-it hints (PR c/81405)

[Bug tree-optimization/81433] New: missing strlen optimization for strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81433 Bug ID: 81433 Summary: missing strlen optimization for strncpy Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/81021] stack-use-after-scope false positive error with exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81021 --- Comment #29 from Ed Catmur --- Created attachment 41750 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41750=edit stack-use-after-scope-read.cpp Another testcase, no library required. Slight difference here is that the offending op is

[Bug c++/81431] add warning for missing initializers in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81431 --- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey --- Also related is bug 55837.

[Bug tree-optimization/81396] [7/8 Regression] Optimization of reading Little-Endian 64-bit number with portable code has a regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81396 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or both this bswap change and the match.pd addition.

[Bug tree-optimization/81396] [7/8 Regression] Optimization of reading Little-Endian 64-bit number with portable code has a regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81396 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/81405] [8 Regression] Invalid write of size 2 in line_corrections::add_hint(fixit_hint const*) (diagnostic-show-locus.c:1514)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81405 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- I'm testing a fix for this crash in diagnostic-show-locus.c. I've opened PR c/81432 to track the fact that the fix-its that are being printed when the crash happens are actually nonsensical.

[Bug c/81432] New: Bogus fix-it hints from -Wmissing-braces when there are excess elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81432 Bug ID: 81432 Summary: Bogus fix-it hints from -Wmissing-braces when there are excess elements Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81431] New: add warning for missing initializers in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81431 Bug ID: 81431 Summary: add warning for missing initializers in constructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/81430] nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81430 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41748 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41748=edit Test for targetm_common.have_named_sections in pass_partition_blocks::gate Patch I'm currently testing. Not sure if

[Bug lto/81430] nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81430 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- This PR may have been triggered by "Do not silently disable flag_reorder_functions when profile info is missing" ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00518.html )

[Bug lto/81430] New: nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81430 Bug ID: 81430 Summary: nvptx acceleration compilation broken because of running pass_partition_blocks Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/81399] New test case 27_io/basic_stringstream/assign/81338.cc fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81399 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/81416] OpenMP craches if large arrays passed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81416 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- > DOUBLE PRECISION,DIMENSION(n) :: b This array is on the stack.

[Bug c++/81408] Lots of new -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations warnings with 7 compared to 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81408 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- After I deleted -funsafe-loop-optimizations in GIMPLE passes, there is no "unsafe-loop-optimizations" for any GIMPLE optimizers. This message in actuality means missed loop optimizations. I am

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18) > Created attachment 41744 [details] > gcc8-pr65757.patch > > Here is a full version, it compiles, no further testing so far. > I guess I can bootstrap/regtest

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-* arm

[Bug c++/81429] maybe_unused attribute triggers syntax error when used on first argument to a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81429 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Benshetler --- Created attachment 41747 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41747=edit Source test case that triggers the bug; corresponds to .ii file Added in an abundance of caution. No header files

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks. That file looks fine. I don't understand why make is saying that there is a circular dependency, implying that runtime.lo depends on runtime.s-gox. It does not. I suggest simply removing your

[Bug c++/81429] New: maybe_unused attribute triggers syntax error when used on first argument to a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81429 Bug ID: 81429 Summary: maybe_unused attribute triggers syntax error when used on first argument to a constructor Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/81416] OpenMP craches if large arrays passed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81416 --- Comment #2 from bz0815 at tirol dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Try increasing your stack limit. I suspect it is too low. With -fopenmp > turned on causes arrays to be always stored on the stack . Many thanks for

[Bug target/80583] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with target attribute and vectorized float: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80583 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|5.4.0 | Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/81184] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr21643.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phi-opt-11.c fail starting with r249450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-06-23 00:00:00 |2017-7-13 CC|

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #16 from Will Schmidt --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #13) > CCing Will Schmidt for the general gimple-folding issue of built-in calls > with missing LHSes. revision 250185 has been committed to handle the gimple-folding

[Bug target/81422] [aarch64] internal compiler error: in update_equiv_regs, at ira.c:3425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81422 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/81428] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in build_one_cst, at tree.c:2079 with -O2. Fixed point division.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81428 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/81342] LTO: lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81342 --- Comment #5 from Anatol --- Having 32bit preamble in 64bit code is a standard situation in x86 OS development. Bootloader (such as GRUB multiboot) leaves the system in 32bit protected mode. It is responsibility of the OS to finish 32bit

[Bug ipa/81277] assert() in multiversioned functions causes compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81277 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Ok, having fixed PR70422, this issue will be fixed. I'm going to push patches related to the PR.

[Bug bootstrap/81425] Bootstrap broken since r250158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81425 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- wot, the Changelog's not enough? apologies.

[Bug middle-end/81428] [7/8 Regression] ICE: in build_one_cst, at tree.c:2079 with -O2. Fixed point division.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81428 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41740|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/81395] [5/6/7/8 Regression] basic_filebuf::overflow recurses and overflows stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81395 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini --- Hi, > It looks strange, because usually _M_set_buffer(-1) is used for uncommitted > mode, but what it's actually doing is nuking the buffers. The next read > would need to do an underflow to refill the get

[Bug rtl-optimization/81423] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug libstdc++/81395] [5/6/7/8 Regression] basic_filebuf::overflow recurses and overflows stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81395 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Hmm, except that if we *do* have a pending output sequence there (i.e. data in the put area), we'd discard it, losing data. I'll try to verify that with a testcase. So we want to avoid getting into a

[Bug rtl-optimization/81423] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Following is a c testcase: --cut here-- unsigned long long int ll = 0; unsigned long long int ull1 = 1ULL; unsigned long long int ull2 = 12008284144813806346ULL; unsigned long long int ull3; void foo () {

[Bug libstdc++/81395] [5/6/7/8 Regression] basic_filebuf::overflow recurses and overflows stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81395 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think uncommitted mode is correct there, because stdio requires a seek on the underlying FILE before writing to it. Setting _M_reading ensures that will happen before the next write. Uncommitted

[Bug c++/81232] compiler crashes for template function overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81232 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/59521] __builtin_expect not effective in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #8) > Created attachment 41737 [details] > New draft patch > > How about this? I added edge attribute for builtin_expect and later used it > in emit_case_decision_tree

[Bug libstdc++/78714] std::get_time / std::time_get::get does not accept full month name in %b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78714 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/45896] [C++0x] Facet time_get not reading dates according to the IEEE 1003 standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Another testcase from PR 71556: #include #include #include #include int main() { std::tm t = {}; std::istringstream ss("9"); ss.imbue(std::locale("C.UTF-8")); ss >> std::get_time(,

[Bug libstdc++/45896] [C++0x] Facet time_get not reading dates according to the IEEE 1003 standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jak-linux.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/71556] set::get_time() requires leading 0s for %H and friends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81428] New: [7.1 regression] ICE: in build_one_cst, at tree.c:2079 with -O2. Fixed point division.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81428 Bug ID: 81428 Summary: [7.1 regression] ICE: in build_one_cst, at tree.c:2079 with -O2. Fixed point division. Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/26461] liveness of thread local references across function calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26461 --- Comment #18 from Stephan Tobies --- +1 - I have a use case where a QuickThread is migrated from one pthread to another. TLS would need to be re-fetched after this migration, but is not due to CSE optimizations. Having a way to disable this

[Bug tree-optimization/35503] Warning about restricted pointers?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35503 --- Comment #10 from Samuel Thibault --- Well, the fact that there are a lot of false negative is not an argument for not including it in -Wall :) The current implementation does catch the issues I have seen in

[Bug tree-optimization/81427] New: Bad optimization for fibonacci function on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81427 Bug ID: 81427 Summary: Bad optimization for fibonacci function on PowerPC Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/80287] C++ crash with __attribute((may_alias))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287 --- Comment #8 from Yvan Roux --- OK, I'll submit a patch to add this second testcase on trunk and then only include it in the backport on GCC 6. Thanks

[Bug rtl-optimization/47582] Combine chains of movl into movq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582 Bug 47582 depends on bug 23684, which changed state. Bug 23684 Summary: Combine stores for non strict alignment targets https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684 What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/23684] Combine stores for non strict alignment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/47059] compiler fails to coalesce loads/stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47059 Bug 47059 depends on bug 23684, which changed state. Bug 23684 Summary: Combine stores for non strict alignment targets https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/80287] C++ crash with __attribute((may_alias))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Hmm, yes, maybe having a second test case without C++17 would be fine.

[Bug c++/80287] C++ crash with __attribute((may_alias))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287 --- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux --- Hi, I got a small issue when testing the backport into the branch: g++.dg/lto/pr80287_0.C is not a suitable testcase for GCC 6 branch, since it uses c++17 class std:any which is not available in GCC 6. In the

[Bug lto/81406] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:6185

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81406 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug target/81426] New: [SH]: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when building webkit2gtk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81426 Bug ID: 81426 Summary: [SH]: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when building webkit2gtk Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 URL:

[Bug bootstrap/81425] Bootstrap broken since r250158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81425 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/81425] Bootstrap broken since r250158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81425 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > Isn't that already fixed? > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00614.html Yep, it works for me. Can please someone install the patch?

[Bug middle-end/81400] Stack smashing not caught by stack protector strong and allowing me to stack smash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81400 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Chris Severance from comment #3) > Unless there's a security reason 0 should never be used as a canary value. > Errant \0 should be caught 100% of the time. When I built malloc canaries > for

[Bug bootstrap/81425] Bootstrap broken since r250158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81425 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Isn't that already fixed? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00614.html

[Bug bootstrap/81425] New: Bootstrap broken since r250158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81425 Bug ID: 81425 Summary: Bootstrap broken since r250158 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c/81342] LTO: lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81342 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Anatol from comment #3) > Hi > > I indeed observe the issue in a kernel project. It is a custom x86 kernel > that is not published yet. > > I tried to narrow down use case and I think I found

[Bug rtl-optimization/81423] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization --- Comment #2 from Uroš

[Bug tree-optimization/81418] [8 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81418 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81423] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/81424] New: gnat bugbox on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81424 Bug ID: 81424 Summary: gnat bugbox on i386 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee:

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41740 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41740=edit gcc8-pr65757.patch WIP patch. There are still many files to do (and this is only before the long double ->

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- I have actually started manual backporting of the 2012-2017 sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128/ differences, I'll attach what I have so far.

[Bug target/71989] aarch64 musl bootstrap fails for out-of-tree builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71989 Timo Teräs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77455] [AArch64] eh_return implementation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77455 --- Comment #6 from Timo Teräs --- *** Bug 71989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/71951] libgcc_s built with -fomit-frame-pointer on aarch64 is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71951 Timo Teräs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77455] [AArch64] eh_return implementation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77455 Timo Teräs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timo.teras at iki dot fi --- Comment #5

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfe at live dot de --- Comment #2 from martin

Re: sanitizer bug maybe.

On 07/10/2017 10:29 AM, George R Goffe via gcc-bugs wrote: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc: In function ‘int __sanitizer::TracerThread(void*)’: ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: