https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67299
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67186
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556
Bug ID: 81556
Summary: Wrong code at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79250
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81557
Bug ID: 81557
Summary: Detect unused const char * and STL string
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51309
--- Comment #2 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> I can't seem to reproduce the warning
Thanks, I can no longer reproduce the warning either. I used GCC 7.1.1 20170622
(Red Hat 7.1.1-3). So it looks like the probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81558
Bug ID: 81558
Summary: Loop not vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Same reassoc issue as PR 81556 it seems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Babokin ---
Hmmm, but this one is triggered at -O1, another only at -O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Dmitry Babokin from comment #2)
> Hmmm, but this one is triggered at -O1, another only at -O2.
-fno-tree-reassoc should help both.
It is often a combination of optimizations that causes the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Babokin ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> -fno-tree-reassoc should help both.
It helps.
> It is often a combination of optimizations that causes the bug. Reassoc is
> doing a good transformation, but it l
201 - 212 of 212 matches
Mail list logo