[Bug demangler/67299] demangler mishandles complex types

2017-07-25 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67299 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Co

[Bug demangler/67186] Libiberty fails to demangle C++ function name if clone suffix contains digit

2017-07-25 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67186 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Co

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] New: Wrong code at -O2

2017-07-25 Thread babokin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 Bug ID: 81556 Summary: Wrong code at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assig

[Bug other/79250] brig/brigfrontend/brig-to-generic.cc: two small problems

2017-07-25 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79250 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/81557] New: Detect unused const char * and STL string

2017-07-25 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81557 Bug ID: 81557 Summary: Detect unused const char * and STL string Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/51309] -Wstrict-overflow false alarm when overflow impossible in loop body

2017-07-25 Thread eggert at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51309 --- Comment #2 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > I can't seem to reproduce the warning Thanks, I can no longer reproduce the warning either. I used GCC 7.1.1 20170622 (Red Hat 7.1.1-3). So it looks like the probl

[Bug middle-end/81558] New: Loop not vectorized

2017-07-25 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81558 Bug ID: 81558 Summary: Loop not vectorized Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assign

[Bug tree-optimization/81556] Wrong code at -O2

2017-07-25 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81556 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] Wrong code at -O1

2017-07-25 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Same reassoc issue as PR 81556 it seems.

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] Wrong code at -O1

2017-07-25 Thread babokin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Babokin --- Hmmm, but this one is triggered at -O1, another only at -O2.

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] Wrong code at -O1

2017-07-25 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Dmitry Babokin from comment #2) > Hmmm, but this one is triggered at -O1, another only at -O2. -fno-tree-reassoc should help both. It is often a combination of optimizations that causes the bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/81555] Wrong code at -O1

2017-07-25 Thread babokin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81555 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Babokin --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > -fno-tree-reassoc should help both. It helps. > It is often a combination of optimizations that causes the bug. Reassoc is > doing a good transformation, but it l

<    1   2   3