https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 11 05:35:39 2017
New Revision: 251046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81671 - nullptr_t template parameter
* pt.c (conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81671
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
> And in fact, there has been a change to the function sh_find_set_of_reg.
> I'd have to dig through the archives etc to find out what was going on
> there.
The change wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 41969
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41969&action=edit
Prototype patch
The issue here is that because the function is empty, GCC decides that we want
to inline it int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81796
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81813
Bug ID: 81813
Summary: Inefficient stack pointer adjustment
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Oh, and you're failing the link due to not having static -lc and -lm
installed..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Aug 11 00:14:57 2017
New Revision: 251041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81808 skip test if reading directory doesn't fail
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
I have no objection to skipping the test on AIX if the test is not correct for
AIX behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard ---
Uncommenting the printf allows it to compile.
This showed up on F26 x86_64 compiling MRNet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Which target is this on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812
Bug ID: 81812
Summary: Empty virtual function fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Aug 10 20:59:10 2017
New Revision: 251040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251040&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81708
* config/i386/i386.opt (mstack-pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81811
Bug ID: 81811
Summary: missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning strcpy result
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81810
Bug ID: 81810
Summary: unused strcpy to a local buffer not eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81738
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81738
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:58:16 2017
New Revision: 251037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR81738: Split vect-alias-check-6.c
The second loop in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81359
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:55:48 2017
New Revision: 251036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251036&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81359 - Unparsed NSDMI error from SFINAE context.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81809
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81809
Bug ID: 81809
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized due to alias analysis
limitation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81799
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On AIX reading the directory just reads the actual contents of the directory,
i.e. the files contained in the directory. Maybe we should restrict the test to
only run on targets where that read used to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81337
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #3)
> After in >> x, x appears to contain the value 0x02ff22770.
That's just an indeterminate value because it was never initialized, and
doesn't get written to by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80451
Bug 80451 depends on bug 80452, which changed state.
Bug 80452 Summary: [DR 1579] incorrect value category deduced for return value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:07:30 2017
New Revision: 251035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251035&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80452 - Core 1579, implicit move semantics on return/throw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81337
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Bug 52477 deals with the parallel issue for construction. As I mentioned
there, I think the right solution is to handle attribute constructor/destructor
using the C++ __static_initialization_and_destruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-*, |
|aarch64*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80452
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
After in >> x, x appears to contain the value 0x02ff22770.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 41967
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41967&action=edit
Pre-processed source of testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81808
Bug ID: 81808
Summary: 27_io /basic_fstream/53984.cc failure on AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
The new testcase fails on any target and not related to offloading. Simplified
further:
#define N 32ULL
int a[N];
const unsigned long long c = 0x7fffULL;
f2_tpf_static32 (void)
{
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79845
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81807
Bug ID: 81807
Summary: many *.cc asan tests fail on powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81799
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81141
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81586
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Aug 10 17:40:11 2017
New Revision: 251029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81586 - valgrind error in output_buffer_append_r with -Wall
gcc/Ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81586
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81806
Bug ID: 81806
Summary: Split in pbds works in O(n) instead of O(log n)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Simplified version, aborts in host code because loop has no effect:
...
#include
extern void abort ();
#define N 32ULL
#pragma omp declare target
int a[N];
#pragma omp end declare target
const unsigned lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81798
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov ---
Can't reproduce this on my end. Are you going to proceed with analyzing the
failure?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to James Cowgill from comment #1)
> Here's another testcase which is reduced a bit further using creduce. It
> requires -O2 to trigger the bug (but that may be unrelated).
I reported it as a misco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
Bug ID: 81805
Summary: Another libgomp.c/for-5.c failure on nvptx -- illegal
memory access
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81804
Bug ID: 81804
Summary: m32c ICE during configure at leaf_function_p, at
final.c:4317
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Bug ID: 81803
Summary: Miscompilation at -O1 on mips64el
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81802
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81802
Bug ID: 81802
Summary: Report cuLaunchKernel launch dimensions in
GOMP_OFFLOAD_run
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81736
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Aug 10 15:29:05 2017
New Revision: 251028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251028&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Don't use frame pointer without stack access
When there is n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> You're right, do you want to send a patch or should I handle it?
It'd probably be better if you handled it; my hard drive that has the ssh keys
that let me commi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
And in fact, there has been a change to the function sh_find_set_of_reg. I'd
have to dig through the archives etc to find out what was going on there.
Meanwhile, it seems that the small backport patch below fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81801
Bug ID: 81801
Summary: [PATCH] Difference of two pointers generates signed
overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
>
> Good, I can confirm it works for GCC 5. Let's then bisect that..
I'm not sure whether this will reveal anything useful.
It's probably just a bug in the function sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
b.c:
long f(double x)
{
return __builtin_lrint(x);
}
and an example value where the exceptions are wrong is 0x1p32 + 0.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Bug ID: 81800
Summary: [8 regression] on aarch64 ilp32 lrint should not be
inlined as two instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170810 (experimental) [trunk revision 251019] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c
small.c: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81485
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-08 00:00:00 |2017-8-10
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Do you have the file $target/libstdc++-v3/include/stamp-bits-sup ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81798
Bug ID: 81798
Summary: Please introduce new attribute to tell that function
zeroes returned memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see how this can happen, that header is present in the libstdc++ source
tree and there's nothing target-specific about it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67638
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Can't reproduce with cross compiler on trunk and gcc-5 branch. Is it
> reproducible with cross compiler? Which options do you use?
You have to use -m4 or -m4a (SH4 or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81783
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I have a patch, but as usually, there's a problem with constants coming from
macros...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81691
Igor Venevtsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||igor.venevtsev at intel dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81357
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
Bug ID: 81797
Summary: gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sbergman at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
> $ g++ --version
> g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170810 (experimental)
> Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81795
Bug ID: 81795
Summary: Stray "originally defined here" when using
-Wc++-compat with #pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81389
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81783
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why can't the unwinder find the function name here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> Why disable it? Can the feature not work, can the test not work?
>
> Disabling the test is papering over the problem as far as I see.
The test does not wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why disable it? Can the feature not work, can the test not work?
Disabling the test is papering over the problem as far as I see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794
Bug ID: 81794
Summary: "would be stringified in traditional C" warning should
be controlled by -Wtraditional
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81793
Bug ID: 81793
Summary: static pie fails on powerpc-linux
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81784
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81792
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81792
Bug ID: 81792
Summary: New fails in compare2.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #64 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 41963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41963&action=edit
Log file with the patch in comment 63
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
