https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
--- Comment #3 from Daan van Vugt ---
Ahh, okay, thanks!
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:58 AM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
>
> Jerry DeLisle changed:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
In one case we optimize super early to
int t = 1 / (int) x <= 0 ? 1 / 0 : 1;
which prevents the VRP optimization from the other case. We almost recover in
isolate-paths, except that Jeff insisted on using __b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Bug ID: 83547
Summary: [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value
not ignored as it ought to be
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83546
Bug ID: 83546
Summary: -march=silvermont doesn't enable rdrnd by default
despite what docs say
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83458
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
Bug ID: 83544
Summary: Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 22 02:07:31 2017
New Revision: 255966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] sync up debug-only stmt list's side effects with empty stmts too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Dec 22 02:07:31 2017
New Revision: 255966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] sync up debug-only stmt list's side effects with empty stmts too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Dec 22 00:07:39 2017
New Revision: 255962
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255962&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/83462 - c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails
gcc/testsuite/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target|arm-none-ea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543
Bug ID: 83543
Summary: strlen of a local array member not optimized on some
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
This slightly different example:
template
struct list { };
template
void foo(list, list, void(*)(T..., U))
{ }
void f(int, int) { }
int main()
{
foo(list{}, list{}, &f);
}
fails with a different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542
Bug ID: 83542
Summary: template deduction failure when using pack in both
deduced and non-deduced contexts
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ice in |[7 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83487
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 23:10:45 2017
New Revision: 255961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/83487
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 23:09:14 2017
New Revision: 255960
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255960&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/83448
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (maybe_warn): Don't cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
int test(void)
{
int x = __INT_MAX__;
return x+1;
}
CCP also turns this into INT_MIN, again it could be bolder.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Yes, it is a known issue, (E)VRP is too conservative.
pushing new range for x_2(D): [2147483647, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { x_2(D) } (1
elements)
Visiting stmt _4 = x_2(D) + 1;
Visiting statement:
_4 = x_2(D) + 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01462.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
Bug ID: 83541
Summary: Missed optimization with int overflow
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 21 22:02:45 2017
New Revision: 255958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/83535
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor ---
Thanks, I have submitted the patch to the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01457.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83540
Bug ID: 83540
Summary: [8 Regression] Invalid code with MATMUL,
-fno-realloc-lhs -ffrontend-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536
--- Comment #2 from mateuszb at poczta dot onet.pl ---
Yes, I agree.
The 80-chars width limit was also significant in this case -- instead of
writing code you must fight with too long lines. I think that there is the time
to change this limit to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539
Bug ID: 83539
Summary: [8 regression] several test case failures starting
with r255947
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
My bisections keep landing on:
commit bb173647d8221f86812f4e98942960b894e9e972 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 23 15:56:28 2017 +
* ipa-fnsummary.c (record_modified_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
This really looks like something tree-ssa-uninit.c ought to be handling too.
[ Just to be clear we should fix both tree-ssa-uninit.c the cfgcleanup. ]
We have a PHI with a default definition on the RHS:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 21 20:48:34 2017
New Revision: 255956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83467
* config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_mask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57076
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Maybe the best thing would be reject this during configure.
>
Since I can't think of anything better, agreed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 42950
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42950&action=edit
hacked up preprocessed file showing problem with only -O3 -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dave.pagan a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] |[6/7 Regression]
|gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE: |[6/7 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:28:10 2017
New Revision: 255954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80747
PR rtl-optimization/83512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:28:10 2017
New Revision: 255954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80747
PR rtl-optimization/83512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:27:21 2017
New Revision: 255953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83523
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (is_wide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:26:34 2017
New Revision: 255952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83521
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (factor_out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83160
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:16:01 2017
New Revision: 255950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255950&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/83406] deducing lambda type
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83467
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 21 19:00:28 2017
New Revision: 255949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83467
* config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_mask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83527
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538
Bug ID: 83538
Summary: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference
!= value_type&
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83537
Bug ID: 83537
Summary: missing integer overflow in offsetof not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Dec 21 18:14:06 2017
New Revision: 255947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[SFN] propagate single-nondebug-stmt's side effects to enclosing list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Untested fix:
--- gimple-ssa-sprintf.c.jj82017-12-19 22:05:44.0 +0100
+++ gimple-ssa-sprintf.c2017-12-21 18:04:30.960153926 +0100
@@ -2466,7 +2466,8 @@ maybe_warn (substring_loc &dirloc, l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83406
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092
--- Comment #8 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Another thing I observed: one difference between the laptop where the bootstrap
worked and the one where it didn't work (besides the different chipsets i5 vs.
i7) is that on the one where the bootstrap doesn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027
--- Comment #11 from Domani Hannes ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #10)
> OK, so I did not realize that duplicate_thunk_for_node does not set
> clone_of but former_clone of, which is of course what it must do. I
> have checked and th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 21, 2017 3:30:45 PM GMT+01:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
>--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 21, 2017 4:20:35 PM GMT+01:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
>--- Comment #32 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 82872, which changed state.
Bug 82872 Summary: [6/7 regression] ICE in ignore_overflows on __PTRDIFF_MAX__
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #24 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #21)
> > Maybe I did more than expected :). Actually 512VNNI has VL bit according to
> > recentl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 21 16:22:04 2017
New Revision: 255944
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255944&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82872
* convert.c (convert_to_integer_1) : Do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I can confirm that the patch above indeed does work. Interestingly, I don't see
the bootstrap on all combinations of Apple Hardware and MAC OS X versions.
Apparently, the problem (for me) only shows up on an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #21)
> Maybe I did more than expected :). Actually 512VNNI has VL bit according to
> recently published extension. Please see
>
> https://software.intel.com/sites
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
> (btw it appears that either the comment or the sense of the last tiebreaker
> is inverted)
I have to take that back, I was confused by the unusual tmp vs. tmp2 order:
sel_rank_for_schedule (const v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Florin Iucha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florin.iucha at amd dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83536
Bug ID: 83536
Summary: One 'false' too much in r255699 for mingw target (in
config/i386/i386.c)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81914
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
One more test case. Code compiled with TEST defined is branchless, without it
has branch.
[code]
#include
#define TEST
void test(uint64_t* a)
{
uint64_t n = *a / 8;
if (0 == n)
n = 1;
#ifdef T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, that changes the situation, I guess your patch is fine then (but please ask
still Uros or Kirill for approval on gcc-patches). But make sure that the
i386-builtins.def | OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL additio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
The fix will be in gcc 7.3 which is planned for release during the third week
of January according to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-12/msg00102.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #21 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Maybe I did more than expected :). Actually 512VNNI has VL bit according to
recently published extension. Please see
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/architec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #32 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Here are the additional types of failures found on Solaris/x86:
* Invalid sh_info:
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr42987 cp_lto_pr42987_0.o-cp_lto_pr42987_1.o link, -flto
-flto-partition=none -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205
--- Comment #16 from simon at pushface dot org ---
I think this was actually INVALID.
I’m glad to report that Arno’s notes in Comment #14 do in fact solve the
problem (after supplying dummies for the parts of the standard library that
aren’t act
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #19)
> Created attachment 42947 [details]
> 512VNNI patch
What is the reason for moving it over? At least right now you don't have any |
OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512VL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #19 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 42947
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42947&action=edit
512VNNI patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #18 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Added a patch for m512vnni, which is done similarly to 512vbmi2. It looks like
most of avx512* bits have to be included in OPTION_MASK_ISA_AVX512F_UNSET. I
leave it to a separate revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83535
Bug ID: 83535
Summary: Doesn’t respect Size for an object
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534
Bug ID: 83534
Summary: C++17: typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept
information
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
I'm having a look at what's still going wrong with Eric's updated
patch. On Solaris/SPARC, there are only two failures left:
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr51567-1 cp_lto_pr51567-1_0.o-cp_lto_pr51
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83533
--- Comment #1 from Rostislav Povelikin
---
If I change aliasing of u with typedef instead of using - works fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83533
Bug ID: 83533
Summary: error: no type named 'X' in 'using = ...'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83509
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 21 14:22:08 2017
New Revision: 255941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix gcov-dump tool for GCDA files (PR gcov-profile/83509).
2017-12-21 Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532
Bug ID: 83532
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in apply_scale, at
profile-count.h:955
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
