[Bug ipa/83346] inliner crash with attribute always_inline/flatten on a destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83346 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:50:30 2017 New Revision: 255968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255968&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-19 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/82801] [6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with Eigen and __attribute__((always_inline, flatten))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:50:30 2017 New Revision: 255968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255968&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-19 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:51:26 2017 New Revision: 255969 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255969&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:52:28 2017 New Revision: 255970 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255970&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/83512] ICE: in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1729 with -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:53:37 2017 New Revision: 255971 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255971&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/80747] [6/7 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-4.c fails with ICE when compiled with options "-fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:53:37 2017 New Revision: 255971 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255971&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/83448] [7 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 08:54:26 2017 New Revision: 255972 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255972&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/82801] [6 Regression] Internal compiler error with Eigen and __attribute__((always_inline, flatten))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] Internal |[6 Regression] Internal

[Bug tree-optimization/83521] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid operand in unary operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE: |[6 Regression] ICE: |v

[Bug tree-optimization/83523] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE: |[6 Regression] ICE: |v

[Bug rtl-optimization/80747] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tailrecursion-4.c fails with ICE when compiled with options "-fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression] |gcc.dg

[Bug c/83448] [7 Regression] ice in get_source_location_for_substring, at input.c:1507

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83548] New: Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 Bug ID: 83548 Summary: Compilation Error using logical function in parameter Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug ipa/83549] New: [7/8 Regression] error: generic thunk code fails for method ... which uses '...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549 Bug ID: 83549 Summary: [7/8 Regression] error: generic thunk code fails for method ... which uses '...' Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug ipa/83549] [7/8 Regression] error: generic thunk code fails for method ... which uses '...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug rtl-optimization/83513] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 3) in fill_vec_av_set in selective scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #2) > Thanks. So the fix for PR 82398 was incomplete. Here we have insns: > > i1: uid: 43 prio: 0 usefulness: 100% > i2: uid: 20 prio: 3 usefulness: 0% >

[Bug debug/83550] [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug debug/83550] New: [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 Bug ID: 83550 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Sta

[Bug fortran/83551] New: ICE on valid code - function with a pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83551 Bug ID: 83551 Summary: ICE on valid code - function with a pointer result Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83551] ICE on valid code - function with a pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83551 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/83552] [7/8 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83552] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552 Bug ID: 83552 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83552] [7/8 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Started with r243633.

[Bug debug/83547] [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83553] New: compiler removes body of the for-loop, although there is a case label inside

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553 Bug ID: 83553 Summary: compiler removes body of the for-loop, although there is a case label inside Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/83335] [8 regression][aarch64,ilp32] gcc.target/aarch64/asm-2.c ICEs since 255481

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83335 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug debug/83550] [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83554] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:41274 with -mmitigate-rop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83554 Bug ID: 83554 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:41274 with -mmitigate-rop Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED K

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- [...] >>* Invalid sh_info: >> >>FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr42987 cp_lto_pr42987_0.o-cp_lto_pr42987_1.o link, >>-flto >>-flto-partition=none

[Bug c++/64462] ICE while compiling lambda using local constexpr reference variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |accepts-invalid Status|RESO

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > For simplicity you might want to elide the partial link step by patching it > out > of lto-wrapper. Does Solaris / SPARC use the linker plugin? You at least seem I'll give it a try.

[Bug c/83539] [8 regression] several test case failures starting with r255947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*, |

[Bug c/83539] [8 regression] several test case failures starting with r255947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83547] [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/83499] [8 Regression] bootstrap fails in stage3 on arm-linux-gnueabihf (as: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83555] New: Unnecessary null check when static_cast is used with references.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83555 Bug ID: 83555 Summary: Unnecessary null check when static_cast is used with references. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83556] New: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556 Bug ID: 83556 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/83556] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Pettinato --- gcc 5.4.0 (Ubuntu Xenial, x86_64-linux-gnu) gives a more reasonable output: $ g++ test.cpp -o a test.cpp:8:21: warning: non-static data member initializers only available with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11

[Bug c++/83556] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556 Paolo Pettinato changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Pettin

[Bug middle-end/83557] New: missing last char in printf fmt string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83557 Bug ID: 83557 Summary: missing last char in printf fmt string Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c++/83556] Regression (7): ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556 Paolo Pettinato changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.3.0 Summary|ICE in gimpli

[Bug middle-end/83557] missing last char in printf fmt string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83557 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83558] New: ld aborted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83558 Bug ID: 83558 Summary: ld aborted Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at

[Bug c++/83558] ld aborted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83558 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83525] open(newunit=funit, status="scratch") fails if an internal file (characters) was read previously.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83525 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83522] gfortran is sometimes confused between what is an element range and what is a character range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83522 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/83559] New: -Wsuggest-attribute=const conflicts with -Wattributes warning about const attribute on function returning void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83559 Bug ID: 83559 Summary: -Wsuggest-attribute=const conflicts with -Wattributes warning about const attribute on function returning void Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug debug/83378] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr54970.c xpass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- Not necessarily errorneous. In this particular case, we simply lack the ability to tell deja-gnu to expect this to pass at -O0 but expect it to fail at any higher level. We have consciously decided to cope

[Bug lto/82027] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Dec 22 17:03:16 2017 New Revision: 255978 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255978&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR 82027] Also stream opt_info of former_clones 2017-12-22 Martin Ja

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 18:00:41 2017 New Revision: 255979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255979&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/83488 * config/i386/avx512vnniintrin.h: Don't c

[Bug debug/83547] [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 18:01:58 2017 New Revision: 255980 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255980&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/83547 * tree-iterator.c (alloc_stmt_list): Start

[Bug debug/83550] [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 18:04:18 2017 New Revision: 255981 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255981&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/83550 * c-decl.c (finish_struct): Set DECL_SOURCE

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug debug/83550] [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 22 18:12:15 2017 New Revision: 255982 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255982&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/83550 * c-decl.c (finish_struct): Set DECL_SOURCE

[Bug debug/83547] [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83550] [6 Regression] Bad location of DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Bad |[6 Regression] Bad location

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 06:07:47PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > This is caused by the patch that allowed a type-spec > in an array constructor. There is special-case code in > match.c(gfc_match_t

[Bug fortran/83551] ICE on valid code - function with a pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83551 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug lto/82027] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -O3 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Dec 22 18:28:59 2017 New Revision: 255983 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255983&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR 82027] Also stream opt_info of former_clones 2017-12-22 Martin Ja

[Bug c++/78344] ICE on invalid c++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in cp_check_const_attributes, at cp/decl2.c:1347)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78344 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug testsuite/83462] [8 regression] c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c fails on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that I am still seeing these failures though the Warray-bounds-3.c ones are working now, FAIL: c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-4.c -Wc++-compat (test for warnings, line 67) FAIL: c-c++-common/W

[Bug fortran/83515] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83556] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83556] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/83553] [6/7/8 Regression] compiler removes body of the for-loop, although there is a case label inside

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83553] [6/7/8 Regression] compiler removes body of the for-loop, although there is a case label inside

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42957 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42957&action=edit gcc8-pr83553.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/83560] New: list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560 Bug ID: 83560 Summary: list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS' Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/83561] New: list-directed output of an integer missing plus (+) sign when output open with SIGN="PLUS"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83561 Bug ID: 83561 Summary: list-directed output of an integer missing plus (+) sign when output open with SIGN="PLUS" Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/83560] list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 83561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/83561] list-directed output of an integer missing plus (+) sign when output open with SIGN="PLUS"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83561 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83560] list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560 --- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- Created attachment 42958 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42958&action=edit NAMELIST integers exhibit same problem PS: An INTEGER in a NAMELIST shows the same issue (missin

[Bug c++/83562] New: broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686 mingw targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562 Bug ID: 83562 Summary: broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686 mingw targets Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/43056] __builtin_prefetch causes ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43056 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/83563] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in instantiate_scev_r)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83563 Bug ID: 83563 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in instantiate_scev_r) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-

[Bug rtl-optimization/83480] [8 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu | Summary|[8 Regression] ICE