https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu |
Summary|[8 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83563
Bug ID: 83563
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
instantiate_scev_r)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43056
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562
Bug ID: 83562
Summary: broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686
mingw targets
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Created attachment 42958
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42958&action=edit
NAMELIST integers exhibit same problem
PS:
An INTEGER in a NAMELIST shows the same issue (missin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83561
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 83561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83561
Bug ID: 83561
Summary: list-directed output of an integer missing plus (+)
sign when output open with SIGN="PLUS"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560
Bug ID: 83560
Summary: list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on
output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42957
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42957&action=edit
gcc8-pr83553.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83462
--- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that I am still seeing these failures though the Warray-bounds-3.c ones
are working now,
FAIL: c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-4.c -Wc++-compat (test for warnings, line
67)
FAIL: c-c++-common/W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78344
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Dec 22 18:28:59 2017
New Revision: 255983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 82027] Also stream opt_info of former_clones
2017-12-22 Martin Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83551
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 06:07:47PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> This is caused by the patch that allowed a type-spec
> in an array constructor. There is special-case code in
> match.c(gfc_match_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] Bad |[6 Regression] Bad location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 18:12:15 2017
New Revision: 255982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/83550
* c-decl.c (finish_struct): Set DECL_SOURCE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 18:04:18 2017
New Revision: 255981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/83550
* c-decl.c (finish_struct): Set DECL_SOURCE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 18:01:58 2017
New Revision: 255980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/83547
* tree-iterator.c (alloc_stmt_list): Start
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 18:00:41 2017
New Revision: 255979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83488
* config/i386/avx512vnniintrin.h: Don't c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82027
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Dec 22 17:03:16 2017
New Revision: 255978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 82027] Also stream opt_info of former_clones
2017-12-22 Martin Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Not necessarily errorneous.
In this particular case, we simply lack the ability to tell deja-gnu to expect
this to pass at -O0 but expect it to fail at any higher level. We have
consciously decided to cope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83559
Bug ID: 83559
Summary: -Wsuggest-attribute=const conflicts with -Wattributes
warning about const attribute on function returning
void
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83522
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83525
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83558
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83558
Bug ID: 83558
Summary: ld aborted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83557
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
Paolo Pettinato changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.3.0
Summary|ICE in gimpli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83557
Bug ID: 83557
Summary: missing last char in printf fmt string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
Paolo Pettinato changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.0
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Pettin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Pettinato ---
gcc 5.4.0 (Ubuntu Xenial, x86_64-linux-gnu) gives a more reasonable output:
$ g++ test.cpp -o a
test.cpp:8:21: warning: non-static data member initializers only available with
-std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
Bug ID: 83556
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12004
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83555
Bug ID: 83555
Summary: Unnecessary null check when static_cast is used with
references.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83499
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> For simplicity you might want to elide the partial link step by patching it
> out
> of lto-wrapper. Does Solaris / SPARC use the linker plugin? You at least seem
I'll give it a try.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
>>* Invalid sh_info:
>>
>>FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr42987 cp_lto_pr42987_0.o-cp_lto_pr42987_1.o link,
>>-flto
>>-flto-partition=none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |accepts-invalid
Status|RESO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83554
Bug ID: 83554
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at
config/i386/i386.c:41274 with -mmitigate-rop
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83335
sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553
Bug ID: 83553
Summary: compiler removes body of the for-loop, although there
is a case label inside
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r243633.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552
Bug ID: 83552
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to
gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83551
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83551
Bug ID: 83551
Summary: ICE on valid code - function with a pointer result
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550
Bug ID: 83550
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Bad location of
DW_TAG_structure_type with forward declaration since
r224161
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83513
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #2)
> Thanks. So the fix for PR 82398 was incomplete. Here we have insns:
>
> i1: uid: 43 prio: 0 usefulness: 100%
> i2: uid: 20 prio: 3 usefulness: 0%
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549
Bug ID: 83549
Summary: [7/8 Regression] error: generic thunk code fails for
method ... which uses '...'
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548
Bug ID: 83548
Summary: Compilation Error using logical function in parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression]
|gcc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE: |[6 Regression] ICE:
|v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Internal |[6 Regression] Internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE: |[6 Regression] ICE:
|v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80747
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:53:37 2017
New Revision: 255971
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83448
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:54:26 2017
New Revision: 255972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83512
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:53:37 2017
New Revision: 255971
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83523
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:52:28 2017
New Revision: 255970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83521
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:51:26 2017
New Revision: 255969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255969&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82801
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:50:30 2017
New Revision: 255968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83346
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:50:30 2017
New Revision: 255968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-19 Jakub Jelinek
77 matches
Mail list logo