[Bug target/83618] New: _rdpid_u32 doesn't work on 64-bit targets as gas expects the 64-bit register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83618 Bug ID: 83618 Summary: _rdpid_u32 doesn't work on 64-bit targets as gas expects the 64-bit register Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/78983] [7/8 Regression] ICE with CAF-DT with allocatable member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983 --- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson --- Using 7.2, I still see an ICE with the reduced example from Comment 3: $ gfortran -fcoarray=lib -c bug-78983.f90 bug-78983.f90:24:0: end module internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get,

[Bug gcov-profile/83617] New: [GCOV] A goto statement in nested loop is wrongly marked as executed twice.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83617 Bug ID: 83617 Summary: [GCOV] A goto statement in nested loop is wrongly marked as executed twice. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug gcov-profile/83616] New: [GCOV] The 'goto' statement in nested for loop leads the label is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83616 Bug ID: 83616 Summary: [GCOV] The 'goto' statement in nested for loop leads the label is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status:

[Bug libfortran/81983] sanitizer detects undefined runtime error in libbacktrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81983 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- I am traveling abroad now, sorry I cannot help.

[Bug target/82092] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 --- Comment #9 from Ryan Schmidt --- Is it safe to use the patch? Will a gcc built with the patch produce correct code? If so, I would like to include it in MacPorts so that I can update our gcc8 port to a newer version. Because of this

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4) --- snip --- > > I dont understand why you did not have those two lines in your source tree. > These were part of my previous patch committed. Oh I see, for some

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > Can you try this and report: > > ... > > It does not work without the patch > > --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/unit.c 2017-12-14 10:02:30.0

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Can you try this and report: > ... It does not work without the patch --- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/unit.c 2017-12-14 10:02:30.0 +0100 +++ libgfortran/io/unit.c 2017-12-29

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Can you try this and report: diff --git a/libgfortran/io/inquire.c b/libgfortran/io/inquire.c index 6ba1224d77c..fefe6e9a165 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/inquire.c +++ b/libgfortran/io/inquire.c @@ -47,9

[Bug c++/83615] New: A reference binding involving a qualification conversion is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83615 Bug ID: 83615 Summary: A reference binding involving a qualification conversion is rejected Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 28 20:43:38 2017 New Revision: 256025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256025=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-28 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/83548] [6/7/8 Regression] Compilation Error using logical function in parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83548 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 28 20:19:01 2017 New Revision: 256022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256022=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-28 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/33884] data-initialized unused variables not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33884 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/30438] Set but never used variable should raise warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 33884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 33884, which changed state. Bug 33884 Summary: data-initialized unused variables not detected https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33884 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/83344] Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344 --- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Thu Dec 28 18:49:12 2017 New Revision: 256021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256021=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/83344 Don't set bogus constant value This patch does not fix PR 83344,

[Bug rtl-optimization/83608] [7/8 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:229 in GIMPLE store merging pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83608 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52370] [4.7 Regression] Spurious "may be used uninitialized" warning for check of optional argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||AstroFloyd at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 57127, which changed state. Bug 57127 Summary: gfortran gives unintended warning on uninitialized optional dummy array of undetermined size https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57127 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/57127] gfortran gives unintended warning on uninitialized optional dummy array of undetermined size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57127 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83614] New: deduction failure for template-template argument with trailing template parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83614 Bug ID: 83614 Summary: deduction failure for template-template argument with trailing template parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #16 from Tim Rentsch --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14) > -pedantic is not designed to reject all programs that are not strictly > conforming, but to enable emitting all _required_ diagnostics. I > don't think a

[Bug libfortran/81983] sanitizer detects undefined runtime error in libbacktrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81983 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug libfortran/83613] New: [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 Bug ID: 83613 Summary: [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug libgomp/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #17 from Tom de Vries

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 --- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 42977 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42977=edit Updated patch, with both openacc and openmp testcase

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp CC|

[Bug fortran/81773] [Coarray] Get with vector index on lhs leads to incorrect caf_get_by_ref() call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83606] [6/7/8 Regression] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/45689] [F03] Missing transformational intrinsic in the trans_func_f2003 list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 42976 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42976=edit Patch which works for minloc(...,dim=1) for rank-one arrays This is a proof-of-concept patch for minloc which works

[Bug testsuite/83612] FAIL: gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c -O2 output pattern test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Tentative patch, similar to https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227886=gcc=rev : ... diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c index e0a2980..41c4a94

[Bug fortran/83611] [PDT] Assignment of parameterized types causes double free error in runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83611 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/83612] FAIL: gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c -O2 output pattern test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Similar to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078#c7 (PR64078 - FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c): ... I suppose the output scan fails because of the '' messages. ...

[Bug testsuite/83612] FAIL: gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c -O2 output pattern test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug testsuite/83612] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c -O2 output pattern test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612 Bug ID: 83612 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ubsan/object-size-9.c -O2 output pattern test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83611] New: [PDT] Assignment of parameterized types causes double free error in runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83611 Bug ID: 83611 Summary: [PDT] Assignment of parameterized types causes double free error in runtime Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/83567] Parametrized derived types: Segmentation fault when assigning a function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83567 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Dec 28 13:22:36 2017 New Revision: 256019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256019=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83567 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 --- Comment #22 from Sergei Trofimovich --- glibc test built with WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS unset are also almost not affected: # diff -U0 ../glibc-orig.log ../glibc-no-word.log --- ../glibc-orig.log 2017-12-28 10:49:36.535635523 + +++

[Bug c/83610] __builtin_expect sometimes is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83610 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Code was compiled with "-O3 -march=core2 -mtune=generic"

[Bug c/83610] New: __builtin_expect sometimes is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83610 Bug ID: 83610 Summary: __builtin_expect sometimes is ignored Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/83607] std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Bad example, because the BM searcher uses std::equal_to, not std::equal_to, but overloading operator==(E, E) would still break the searcher if it used the array optimization for enum E.

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 --- Comment #14 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #13) > Created attachment 42974 [details] > Tentative patch with testcase > > Currently doing: > - bootstrap and reg test on x86_64, and > - build & libgomp regtest on

[Bug libstdc++/83607] std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, because not all enumeration types behave like the integers: enum E : unsigned char { }; namespace std { template<> struct equal_to { bool operator()(E l, E r) const noexcept { return

[Bug libstdc++/83607] std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607 Sergey Semushin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Predelnik at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/83607] std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/83239] False positive from -Wstringop-overflow on simple std::vector code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239 --- Comment #21 from Tony E Lewis --- Many thanks to all for the thought, time and work you're devoting to this issue.

[Bug c++/83591] -Wduplicated-branches fires in system headers in template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83591 --- Comment #4 from Tony E Lewis --- Thanks for the response. That all sounds sensible.

[Bug tree-optimization/83609] New: [8 Regression] ICE in read_complex_part at gcc/expr.c:3202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83609 Bug ID: 83609 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in read_complex_part at gcc/expr.c:3202 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/83608] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:229 in GIMPLE store merging pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83608 Bug ID: 83608 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:229 in GIMPLE store merging pass Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED