[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- 0065ff3a : 65ff3a: b8 01 00 00 00 mov$0x1,%eax 65ff3f: c3 retq 65ff40: b8 01 00 00 00 mov$0x1,%eax 65ff45: c3

[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] New: RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 Bug ID: 84058 Summary: RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/84043] -fsanitize=alignment leads to massive compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84043 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/84056] map insertes a pair when check a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Alper Ce from comment #3) > I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i > just used == operator to check value of it. Again, did you read the doc for operator[]?

[Bug target/81763] Issues with BMI on 32bit x86 apps on GCC 7.1+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81763 --- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #37) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #33) > > > and it should work. The last case would be right now: > > SI:N+1 = SI:N &~ SI:N+2; SI:N+2 = SI:N+1 &~

[Bug tree-optimization/84037] [8 Regression] Speed regression of polyhedron benchmark since r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84037 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- https://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-old/c++bench-czerny/pb11/pb11-summary.txt-2-0.html runs with -Ofast -funroll-loops so indeed does not seem essential to trigger the regression (it may be two different ones of

[Bug libstdc++/84056] map insertes a pair when check a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056 --- Comment #3 from Alper Ce --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) > Where is the bug? Did you read the documentation for operator[]? I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i just used == operator to

[Bug c++/84015] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84015 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

<    1   2   3