https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095
Bug ID: 84095
Summary: false-positive -Wrestrict warnings for memcpy within
array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug ID: 84094
Summary: several correctness issues in gfortran.dg
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82819
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should we close this PR now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83176
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should we close this PR now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 84073, which changed state.
Bug 84073 Summary: In -fc-prototypes fixed (nonzero) length strings are mapped
to plain char in prototype.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84073
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84073
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84073
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jan 29 07:11:16 2018
New Revision: 257138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84073
* resolve.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> @r257131, with GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0, driver version 384.111, geforce 710, and
> cuda 8.0, kernel version 4.13.0-32-generic:
Same result without GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0.
80128
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/8.0.0-alpha20180128/lto-wrapper
Target: powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180128/work/gcc-8-20180128/configure
--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --target=powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84093
Bug ID: 84093
Summary: Invalid nested derived type constructor not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84092
Bug ID: 84092
Summary: ICE on C++14 code with variable template: in
build_qualified_name, at cp/tree.c:2043
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84033
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84033
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Jan 29 04:31:18 2018
New Revision: 257137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] PR84033, powerpc64le -moptimize-swaps bad code with vec_vbpermq
vbp
/8.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180128 (experimental) [trunk revision 257131] (GCC)
$
$ g++-7.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84033
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Jan 29 04:23:00 2018
New Revision: 257135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR84033, powerpc64le -moptimize-swaps bad code with vec_vbpermq
vbpermq pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82086
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> > I think this bug is invalid and gfortran is correct.
> >
> > If you do this:
> >
> > &n
> > ta(1:8)%c = 'bogus'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84090
Bug ID: 84090
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch,
at tree-cfg.c:6151
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Cao jin from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Plugins issues like this should reported to the plugin author and not to
> > gcc.
>
> I don't know gcc internals, from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052
--- Comment #3 from PaX Team ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Plugins issues like this should reported to the plugin author and not to gcc.
what makes you think it's a plugin issue? i reported several gcc bugs myself
over the yea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089
Bug ID: 84089
Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-x.C
-std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There are *two* conditional branches leading to that "return 1". After
dbr one is a delay-slot seq, and the other has lost the assignment of the
return value.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It's the dbr ("reorg") pass that is deleting the insn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088
Bug ID: 84088
Summary: [nvptx] libgomp.oacc-fortran/declare-*.f90 execution
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84086
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|nvptx |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84087
Bug ID: 84087
Summary: string::assign problem with two arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84086
Bug ID: 84086
Summary: [nvptx] segfault in instantiate_scev_r for
libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90 -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82086
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
NAG 6.1 rejects the third case (tc). After commenting this it prints:
bogus
bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82086
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> I think this bug is invalid and gfortran is correct.
>
> If you do this:
>
> &n
> ta(1:8)%c = 'bogus'
> /
>
> You get what you expect. The way you have it, y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84085
Bug ID: 84085
Summary: Array element is unnecessary loaded twice
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84083
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think bar can still change the value of what ss points to.
What, you mean, by walking up the stack? I don't see why the compiler should
accommodate that by av
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84083
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think bar can still change the value of what ss points to.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84073
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Ed Smith-Rowland from comment #7)
> Thank you.
>
> I was curious, is there anything/anyone working the opposite problem?
> A -ffortran-interfaces converting structs to type and function protos t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84073
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84073
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|WAITI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83831
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 43266
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43266&action=edit
Patch for GCC 6
This patch is for GCC 6. Tested with "make -k check" on rx-sim for c and c++
with no new failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84084
Bug ID: 84084
Summary: -O2 Early VPR pass wrongly removes "ret" exit basic
block causing infinite loop/segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83828
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83828
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from H.J.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84081
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82829
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84083
Bug ID: 84083
Summary: [missed optimization] loop-invariant strlen() not
hoisted out of loop
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82829
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77428
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> > Created attachment 39528 [details]
> > tentative patch
>
> Have you sent this patch to the gcc-patches mailing list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84082
Bug ID: 84082
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with broken template function
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84081
Bug ID: 84081
Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx512bitalg-vpopcntb-1.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84081
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
49 matches
Mail list logo
