[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner --- A similar error happens with the __builtin_vsx_udiv_2di() that happens with __builtin_vsx_div_2di(), which shows the splitter for vsx_udiv_v2di calling gen_udivdi3() directly: [bergner@makalu-lp1 PR83926]$

[Bug target/68028] [6/7/8 regression] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point" with LTO on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 f

[Bug middle-end/81812] [7/8 Regression] Empty virtual function fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81812 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #8 from

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Feb 1 14:17:07 2018 New Revision: 257296 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257296&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Use range info in split_constant_offset (PR 81635) Thi

[Bug middle-end/83665] [8 regression] Big code size regression and some code quality improvement at Jan 2 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83665 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- I have started with experiments on czerny. Set --param inline-min-speedup from 8 to 15 at 30th of January and to 30 yesterday. Most of size regression comes away with 15 and I observed to off-noise regressions

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > This shouldn't happen with degagnu after > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=commit;h=5256bd82343000c76bc0e48139003f90b6184347 Which would mean requiring at least

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- As C++ now has standardized attributes, the question is what does the standard say about whether standard attributes on a template are inherited to specializations or not, and if the standard is fuzzy about i

[Bug c/84168] New: Please backport "Avoid assembler warnings from AArch64 constructor/destructor priorities."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84168 Bug ID: 84168 Summary: Please backport "Avoid assembler warnings from AArch64 constructor/destructor priorities." Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- > > Could be a bug in the old Apple as. However, the testcase is fishy in > explicitly passing -m16. For multilibbed x86 targets, that gets > overridden for the non-default multilibs (either with -m32 or m64).

[Bug target/83370] [AARCH64]Tailcall register may be corrupted by epilogue code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- >> /var/folders/zz/zyxvpxvq6csfxvn_n87r00021y/T//cchNxmiW.s:7:no such >> instruction: `shrx %eax, 4(%esp),%eax' > http://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/SARX:SHLX:SHRX.html Could be a bug

[Bug web/84167] New: bugzilla should have a "next bug" button

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84167 Bug ID: 84167 Summary: bugzilla should have a "next bug" button Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug tree-optimization/84013] wrong __restrict clique with inline asm operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013 --- Comment #4 from Katsunori Kumatani --- Thanks, it's quite useful in some "meta asm" cases (in conjunction with plugins, asms can be useful since you can't add builtins). Or when doing custom calls in asms (or syscalls, etc) and you know what

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug c++/84162] Internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13617 / SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- A temporary fix: Index: ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c === *** ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c (revision 257261) --- ../trunk/gcc/fortran/tr

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- A temporary fix: Index: ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c === *** ../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c (revision 257261) --- ../trunk/gcc/fortran/t

[Bug target/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target Target Milestone|---

[Bug preprocessor/84165] #define strlen asdf affects calls to asdf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83370] [AARCH64]Tailcall register may be corrupted by epilogue code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370 Renlin Li changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83370] [AARCH64]Tailcall register may be corrupted by epilogue code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370 --- Comment #1 from Renlin Li --- Author: renlin Date: Thu Feb 1 13:02:24 2018 New Revision: 257294 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257294&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR83370][AARCH64]Use tighter register constraint for sibcall patterns. In a

[Bug c/84166] New: Wrong warning message emitted for loss of qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84166 Bug ID: 84166 Summary: Wrong warning message emitted for loss of qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug preprocessor/84165] New: #define strlen asdf affects calls to asdf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84165 Bug ID: 84165 Summary: #define strlen asdf affects calls to asdf Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: prepr

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12) > I've just checked a x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2 build: the test PASSes for > -m64, but FAILs for -m32 with > > /var/folders/zz/zyxvpxvq6csfxvn_n000

[Bug target/35179] execs crash in shared lib destructor = do_global_dtors_aux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35179 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- We encounter an unrecognizable insn: (insn 59 58 43 7 (set (reg:DI 124) (rotatert:DI (reg:DI 125 [ c ]) (subreg:QI (and:SI (reg:SI 128) (const_int 65535 [0

[Bug c/77331] incorrect range location in -Wformat with a concatenated format literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77331 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- I've just checked a x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2 build: the test PASSes for -m64, but FAILs for -m32 with /var/folders/zz/zyxvpxvq6csfxvn_n87r00021y/T//cchNxmiW.s:7:no such instruction

[Bug rtl-optimization/84164] [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84164 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82795] [7/8 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/82795] [7/8 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 1 12:07:46 2018 New Revision: 257292 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257292&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-01 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [6 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 --- Comment #21 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Feb 1 12:00:57 2018 New Revision: 257291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257291&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-11-15 Bin Cheng

[Bug tree-optimization/82726] ICE in verify_ssa during GIMPLE pass: pcom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82726 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Feb 1 12:00:57 2018 New Revision: 257291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257291&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-11-15 Bin Cheng

[Bug rtl-optimization/84164] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633 at -O1

ith-as=/usr/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-257290-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180201 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/82795] [7 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- I've tested this on powerpc64-linux {-m64,-m32} as well (change_zero_ext is pretty important for us; we have big testcases for this and related code). No issues found.

[Bug target/80569] i686: "shrx" instruction generated in 16-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80569 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- The problem still exists, and according to gcc-testresults the test FAILs on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0, i686-pc-linux-gnu, and x86_64-pc-linux

[Bug preprocessor/84161] preprocessor should discard Fortran comments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84161 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > It should not. Well, why not? If you say that the preprocessor is meant only for C/C++, then it shouldn't be used with Fortran at all. If one uses i

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/83846] Some SVE tests fail with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83846 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Feb 1 11:04:58 2018 New Revision: 257290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257290&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix SVE testsuite failures for ILP32 (PR 83846

[Bug target/83845] [8 regression] new failures after r256620

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83845 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Feb 1 11:02:52 2018 New Revision: 257285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257285&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Tighten aarch64_secondary_reload condition (PR

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Bug 81661 depends on bug 84117, which changed state. Bug 84117 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5798 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/84117] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5798

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug preprocessor/84161] preprocessor should discard Fortran comments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84161 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/52477] Wrong initialization order? __attribute__((constructor)) vs static data access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > I will try to look at it. Do you see a chance to look at this before GCC 8? Thanks. Rainer

[Bug libstdc++/70129] [6 Regression] stdlib.h: No such file or directory when using -isystem /usr/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70129 fiesh at zefix dot tv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fiesh at zefix dot tv --- Comment

[Bug target/84154] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|

[Bug c/84163] [avr] Allow address space qualifier for compound literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84163 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space Target|

[Bug c/84163] New: [avr] Allow address space qualifier for compound literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84163 Bug ID: 84163 Summary: [avr] Allow address space qualifier for compound literals Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement P

[Bug target/82795] [8 Regression] ICE in predicate_mem_writes, at tree-if-conv.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82795 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drohr at jwdt dot org --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/84152] [7 Regression] ICE in tree-if-conv.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84152] [7 Regression] ICE in tree-if-conv.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/81661] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81661 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 1 10:08:26 2018 New Revision: 257284 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257284&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81661 PR tree-optimization/84117

[Bug tree-optimization/84117] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5798

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 1 10:08:26 2018 New Revision: 257284 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257284&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81661 PR tree-optimization/84117

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'indirect_ref' in add_decl_as_local, at fortran/trans-decl.c:256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/84151] [6/7/8 Regression] g++ generates two identical loads in a volatile-qualified member function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > I'll do a build and test run with this patch (which in the case of the setup > where I encountered the ICE means building host and accelerator compiler and > runnin

[Bug ipa/84149] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 505.mcf/605.mcf ~10% performance regression with r256888

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84149 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5) > > That looks good. > that patch was by Uros though. Yes I misread. Uros: that patch is pre-approved. >

[Bug c++/84162] Internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13617 / SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84162 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5) > Hi Tom, > > That looks good. Hi, that patch was by Uros though. > But maybe the REG_P check should be in the outer "if"? > Slightly easier and safer to

[Bug tree-optimization/84005] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva --- With the current vect alignment computations, we end up using the alignment of the arrays, so on x86_64 it's 256bits (DATA_ALIGNMENT bumps the alignment up) and on ppc64 it's 32bits, no alignment bump. Bac

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- Darwin has its own ABI, and that is what those assembler routines are for. This has nothing to do with this bug report; please use the mailing lists for other questions/discussions/etc.

[Bug c++/84162] Internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13617 / SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84162 --- Comment #1 from Lukas Mosimann --- The minimal example is already reduced a lot; until now, I wasn't able to track the error down to an even smaller chunk of code.

[Bug c++/84162] New: Internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13617 / SEGFAULT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84162 Bug ID: 84162 Summary: Internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13617 / SEGFAULT Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hi Tom, That looks good. But maybe the REG_P check should be in the outer "if"? Slightly easier and safer to exit as early as possible.

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, andrewjenner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 > > Andrew Jenner changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/84013] wrong __restrict clique with inline asm operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, katsunori.kumatani at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013 > > --- Comment #2 from Katsunori Kumatani > --- > I'm not familiar with tre

[Bug libgomp/84041] [nvptx] Hang in for-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84041 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Hmm, with the latest trunk and after upgrading to driver version 390.25, for-3.exe passes.

[Bug preprocessor/84161] New: preprocessor should discard Fortran comments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84161 Bug ID: 84161 Summary: preprocessor should discard Fortran comments Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: prepro

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3) > Oops. > > --cut here-- > diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c > index 970dd26..a9929f2 100644 > --- a/gcc/combine.c > +++ b/gcc/combine.c > @@ -11483,7 +11483

[Bug fortran/83705] [8 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2