[Bug libgcc/67336] Verify pointers during stack unwind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67336 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug c++/84476] New: [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476 Bug ID: 84476 Summary: [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/70186] RFE: better handling of misspelled attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70186 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug target/18206] -dynamic-linker option seems to be badly named and broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18206 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/84475] New: pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on riscv-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84475 Bug ID: 84475 Summary: pthread doesn't define _REENTRANT in preprocessor on riscv-linux Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/66742] abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug fortran/82007] DTIO write format stored in a string leads to severe errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82007] DTIO write format stored in a string leads to severe errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Feb 20 04:05:38 2018 New Revision: 257837 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257837=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug c++/84429] [8 Regression] ICE capturing variable-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84429 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84429] [8 Regression] ICE capturing variable-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84429 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Feb 20 03:39:37 2018 New Revision: 257836 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257836=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84429 - ICE capturing VLA. * lambda.c

[Bug c++/61491] An explicit specialization of a member enumeration of a class template is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61491 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug middle-end/68733] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 --- Comment #17 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #16) > The change is installed and it's now the default on hppa-linux. This is > an ABI change > and I don't plan  to change the default on 32-bit hpux. so... can

[Bug tree-optimization/84474] Unexpected -Wstringop-truncation on strncpy with string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84474 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Summary|[gcc 8]

[Bug tree-optimization/84474] New: Unexpected -Wstringop-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84474 Bug ID: 84474 Summary: Unexpected -Wstringop-truncation Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/83955] false positive implicit-fallthrough warning on switch enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83955 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug ipa/57218] [6/7/8 Regression] Excessive inlining even at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [gcc 8] Inconsistent -Wstringop-truncation warnings with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/83975] [8 Regression] ICE in set_parm_default_def_partition, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 19 22:09:13 2018 New Revision: 257827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257827=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83344 PR

[Bug fortran/83344] Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 19 22:09:13 2018 New Revision: 257827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257827=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83344 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [gcc 8] Inconsistent -Wstringop-truncation warnings with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, the conditional assignment is eliminated in favor of the one in the next basic block. Considering the first statement in the next basic block (rather than just the current one) is also the solution I'm

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [gcc 8] Inconsistent -Wstringop-truncation warnings with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- Ok there maybe a problem with the optimizer as you describe it in bug 84470. However why does variant 3 from comment #0 yields a warning too ? if (iCString) { strncpy(_cstring, iCString,

[Bug tree-optimization/84470] test for address of member being null not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/84146] ICE with -mcet in dwarf2out_var_location, involving sigsetjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84146 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 19 21:58:04 2018 New Revision: 257826 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257826=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84146 * reg-notes.def (REG_CALL_ARG_LOCATION): New reg

[Bug tree-optimization/83965] [8 Regression] ICE in vectorize_fold_left_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83965 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [gcc 8] Inconsistent -Wstringop-truncation warnings with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug libgomp/84466] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c fails starting with r257723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/84473] New: FAIL: libgomp.c++/member-5.C execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84473 Bug ID: 84473 Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c++/member-5.C execution test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/69602] [6/7/8 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug fortran/84472] New: Missing finalization and memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84472 Bug ID: 84472 Summary: Missing finalization and memory leak Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/84471] New: Instruction reordering happens in lambdas even with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84471 Bug ID: 84471 Summary: Instruction reordering happens in lambdas even with -O0 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84470] test for address of member being null not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- I can't see the difference between the 2 cases? clang gives for both: warning: comparison of array 'p->a' equal to a null pointer is always false [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]

[Bug tree-optimization/84470] New: test for address of member being null not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84470 Bug ID: 84470 Summary: test for address of member being null not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/79096] [7/8 Regression] address sanitizer and jni does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79096 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Nothing, it never reaches memset before it exits.

[Bug target/84371] test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3.c fails on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371 --- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt --- (In reply to seurer from comment #1) > In addition to trunk this also fails with gcc 7 Yup. There was/is an ice in one of the builtins-3.* tests that should be better now , per

[Bug c++/84378] Misleading diagnostics when using ambiguous names for ptr to memfun args in member fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84378 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/35339] Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #14) > Fixed (finally). > > Closing. Thanks Thomas!

[Bug debug/83935] DWARF for a variant part is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83935 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey --- For Rust I ended up following the letter of the standard, so I'm going to follow this in the gdb patches as well. That said, gdb can be adapted to work with either approach, so it's not strictly necessary to

[Bug c++/84444] ICE with __builtin_launder and cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug c++/84444] ICE with __builtin_launder and cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 19 19:36:41 2018 New Revision: 257822 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257822=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/8 * builtins.c (builtin_mathfn_code): Don't check if

[Bug c++/84463] Supposedly-incompliant "error: '* key0' is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84463 --- Comment #1 from sergey.ignatchenko at ithare dot com --- oops, forgot to mention command line: g++ -std=c++1z -lstdc++ -Werror ../chachatest.cpp where chachatest.cpp is provided in "CODE" section above

[Bug tree-optimization/84452] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_simd_clones at gcc/omp-simd-clone.c:1612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84452 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84430] [7 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp simd in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/84448] [6/7 Regression] ICE with broken condition in parallel for loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84448 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/32306] [6/7/8 Regression] redundant && || not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.5 |9.0 --- Comment #38 from Jeffrey A.

[Bug c++/84448] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with broken condition in parallel for loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84448 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 19 19:16:26 2018 New Revision: 257821 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257821=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84448 * parser.c (cp_parser_binary_expression): For

[Bug c++/84430] [7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp simd in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 19 19:12:14 2018 New Revision: 257820 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257820=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84430 * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1):

[Bug driver/83193] Help for invalid -march= options from cc1 omits -march=native on x86-64, arm. aarch64, output also inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83193 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Roberts --- Correct, it does not show native in the list of valid options presented to the user.

[Bug tree-optimization/84452] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_simd_clones at gcc/omp-simd-clone.c:1612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84452 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 19 18:58:13 2018 New Revision: 257819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257819=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84452 * tree-vect-patterns.c

[Bug middle-end/68733] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 --- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- The change is installed and it's now the default on hppa-linux. This is an ABI change and I don't plan  to change the default on 32-bit hpux.

[Bug c++/79064] Cannot overload member function templates on type of literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 19 18:49:21 2018 New Revision: 257818 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257818=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79064 * g++.dg/template/overload15.C (f): Use 0u - 1ll

[Bug tree-optimization/68356] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68264.c -O* execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356 --- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I'd expect any complete patch default to -fno-math-errno to add -fmath-errno to all tests relating to errno setting by libm functions (so that patch was incomplete for lack of test

[Bug c++/79064] Cannot overload member function templates on type of literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug testsuite/80551] c-c++-common/tsan/race_on_mutex.c fails on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/82989] [6/7/8 regression] Inexplicable use of NEON for 64-bit math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989 --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- (In reply to sudi from comment #17) > Since this looks like a pretty invasive problem, according to my discussions > with Wilco and Kyrill, I think I will try to propose a smaller, but > temporary fix using the ?s

[Bug c++/55922] brace initializing parent cause bogus virtual base constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- The testcase in comment 1 originally made three calls to _ZN4BaseC2Ev until r238688 when it made two, and then only one call after r238689 (the fix for PR 66617). So it looks like the reason it's still

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 --- Comment #23 from Martin Liška --- > One side issue that is not solved at all by the patch is > -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope, since that still leads to extreme stack > usage in the kernel. The problem here is that it forces many local

[Bug target/84371] test case gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3.c fails on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- Will: Here is the bug report I just got from Peter. From our sametime conversation sounds like you have addressed these in a recent update. Take a look, may be that Peter needs to update his tree

[Bug sanitizer/82183] gcc.dg/sancov/cmp0.c fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81272] libdecnumber/decNumber.c:6032: wrong condition ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/82183] gcc.dg/sancov/cmp0.c fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 19 18:30:31 2018 New Revision: 257817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257817=gcc=rev Log: Put pass_sancov_O0 before pass_lower_switch with -O0 (PR sanitizer/82183).

[Bug tree-optimization/82491] UBSAN in gcc/gimple-fold.c:6187:6: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 19 18:29:52 2018 New Revision: 257816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257816=gcc=rev Log: Fix ubsan in gimple-fold.c (PR tree-optimization/82491). 2018-02-19 Martin Liska

[Bug c/81272] libdecnumber/decNumber.c:6032: wrong condition ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Feb 19 18:29:20 2018 New Revision: 257815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257815=gcc=rev Log: Do not use bit and for conjunction of predicates (PR c/81272). 2018-02-19 Martin

[Bug fortran/35339] Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 Bug 25829 depends on bug 35339, which changed state. Bug 35339 Summary: Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/35339] Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Feb 19 18:21:45 2018 New Revision: 257814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257814=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/35339

[Bug fortran/80945] Invalid code with allocatable character array in READ/WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Feb 19 18:21:45 2018 New Revision: 257814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257814=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/35339

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 --- Comment #20 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > In any case, having a fast and at least for double precise exp10 in glibc > would be also beneficial, then this issue would go away at least on glibc > targets. Yes,

[Bug middle-end/68733] [6/7/8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82965] [8 regression][armeb] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c starts failing after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #17) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > Created attachment 43464 [details] > > gcc8-pr82004.patch > > > > Thus, does this fix the miscompare? I'll

[Bug target/81693] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr25967-*.c -O* execution test on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693 --- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have submitted a patch some time ago at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00939.html Mike asked for some changes and I got distracted before being able to fulfill the requests. I can

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 --- Comment #17 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Created attachment 43464 [details] > gcc8-pr82004.patch > > Thus, does this fix the miscompare? I'll bootstrap/regtest it on > x86_64-linux and i686-linux, but don't

[Bug tree-optimization/84443] powerpc suboptimal code generation (shrink wrap unlikely path) for Linux spinlocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84443 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84468] [gcc 8] Inconsistent -Wstringop-truncation warnings with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 Sérgio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergio at serjux dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 --- Comment #16 from Andrey Guskov --- Oh wow, that was unexpected! Will test and report back ASAP.

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #62 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Feb 19 17:02:38 2018 New Revision: 257811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257811=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/81797 Add .NOTPARALLEL to include/Makefile for darwin Backport from

[Bug ada/84277] [8 Regression] A lot of new acats testsuite failures

passes2687 # of unexpected failures4 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 22 # of unsupported tests 6 /opt/devel/SCRATCH/tmp.e2kXrnqZV0/gcc-8.0.0/gcc-8.0.0/gcc/gnatmake version 8.0.1 20180219 (experimental) [trunk revision 257803] Improved by 11

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- If glibc implements a faster exp10/exp10f, we could do what I've done for PR84309 and expand pow (10, x) as exp10 (x) and pow (C, x) where C is pow (10, N) for integral N as exp10 (log10 (C) * x). Even if

[Bug c/81272] libdecnumber/decNumber.c:6032: wrong condition ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Confirmed, it's not consistent. Let me fix that. Seven months later, it seems to me to be still not fixed.

[Bug fortran/79854] diagnostics: gfc_conv_constant_to_tree should be gfc_internal_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/79854] diagnostics: gfc_conv_constant_to_tree should be gfc_internal_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/84460] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84460 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/84460] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84460 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Feb 19 16:28:39 2018 New Revision: 257810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257810=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-16 Sebastian Peryt PR target/84460

[Bug target/84148] CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148 --- Comment #16 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: itsimbal Date: Mon Feb 19 16:25:49 2018 New Revision: 257809 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257809=gcc=rev Log: CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by defualt

[Bug bootstrap/84450] bootstrap-lto ICE in g-dyntab.adb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84450 --- Comment #1 from Steven Noonan --- Sorry for the comment spam, but... I think DMARC/DKIM caused the notification for this bug to drop on the floor, as I saw a DMARC report for my domain saying 65 messages on *@gnu.org were rejected because

[Bug libstdc++/84442] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/cons/terminate.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug libstdc++/84442] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/cons/terminate.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/84442] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/cons/terminate.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-02-19 11:17 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Does HPUX provide _exit() in instead? Yes.

[Bug c++/84446] [8 Regression] ICE with broken lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84446 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- ... well, I must add the diagnostic would be much more terse and similar to, eg, clang's.

[Bug libstdc++/84442] FAIL: 30_threads/thread/cons/terminate.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84442 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Does HPUX provide _exit() in instead?

[Bug c++/84446] [8 Regression] ICE with broken lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84446 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

  1   2   3   >