[Bug libgomp/84466] [8 regression] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c fails starting with r257723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84466 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- So the issue is for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { y[i] = i; for (j = 0; j < N; j++) { if (j > 500) { x[i][j] = i + j + 3; y[j] = i*j +

[Bug rtl-optimization/82982] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 5) in ready_sort_real in haifa scheduler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #4) > Tried to re-create locally, I've gotten two ICE's using the provided > testcode snippet, neither look quite like the originally reported issue. You are right.

[Bug tree-optimization/84584] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584 Bug ID: 84584 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84578] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with flexible array member and constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84578 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/84580] Equality and relational ops for containers behave differently in Debug Mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84580 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46783] [OOP] TRANSFER with polymorphic MOLD=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/84548] [8 regression] gcov ICE in process_file, at gcov.c:1154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548 --- Comment #23 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20) ... > Isn't that > an old data file you forgot to remove? After rebuild all and re-run myproject' tests I can confirm 1) r257859 FAIL 2) r257859 + patch

[Bug target/84575] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84575] [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84575 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 27 08:44:48 2018 New Revision: 258030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258030=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84575 * gcc.target/i386/pr84309.c: Add -mno-avx2 to

[Bug preprocessor/84583] New: -fdirectives-only does not handle CRLF properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84583 Bug ID: 84583 Summary: -fdirectives-only does not handle CRLF properly Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/84582] New: [8 Regression] Rejected valid C++ code since r257961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582 Bug ID: 84582 Summary: [8 Regression] Rejected valid C++ code since r257961 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84582] [8 Regression] Rejected valid C++ code since r257961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #15 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, This latest patch seems to fix the occurences I have in my own code. Thanks ;) Cheers, Romain

<    1   2   3