https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84704
--- Comment #1 from Vegard Nossum ---
I should add that both -g and (one of) -Os/-O1/-O2/-O3 seems necessary for the
ICE to trigger. Also, it seems that 7.3.0 works by emitting this for -O1:
b():
mov eax, DWORD PTR a[rip]
mov ecx, 0
cdq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84704
Bug ID: 84704
Summary: internal compiler error: gimplification failed
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84703
Bug ID: 84703
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bare_aggregate,
at cp/constexpr.c:2810
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84702
Bug ID: 84702
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c:15082
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84701
Bug ID: 84701
Summary: casting to ( typeof(variable) ) gives wrong results
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84700
Bug ID: 84700
Summary: ICE on 32-bit BE powerpc targets w/ -misel -O1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84618
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31009
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81700
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Racicot ---
Still happen with 7.3 and trunk on godbolt: https://godbolt.org/g/xXUn1v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28364
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
This still segfaults:
ig25@linux-d6cw:/tmp> cat a.f90
implicit none
type Plane
integer :: M(1,1)
end type
type(Plane), parameter :: planes(1) = [ Plane(1) ]
integer:: f(1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84670
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
Elmar Stellnberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28154
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to/Duplicate of pr36683?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I can only get the ICE with an instrumented compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-26 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61180
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34742
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|ICE with ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569
--- Comment #14 from Oliver Tale-Yazdi ---
So can we close this?
You actually fixed two bugs, should I open a second report for the decltype bug
(accepts-invalid) and link it here as solved?
I dont really know how bugzilla is used here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, |heap-use-after-free with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> In case you haven't creduce'd the test case yet, here's what I got:
Of course that's a totally bogus test case given what Bruno was trying to
prove, namely tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34742
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33097
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #19 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84699
Bug ID: 84699
Summary: discarded value expression of volatile class type
shall materialize a temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40978
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Six years without any activity. Is there any reason to keep this PR opened?
No feedback in more than two years.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42122
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |target
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
For reference, testing successfully completed too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83319
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 4 13:56:09 2018
New Revision: 258233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83076
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 4 13:56:09 2018
New Revision: 258233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83076
* resolve.c (re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83898
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83076
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83646
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83275
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82842
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82649
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82753
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84698
Bug ID: 84698
Summary: ICE when using noexcept(noexcept()) declaration on
global friend function of template class
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code
Bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
There is also a regression here:
$ cat a.f90
program main
implicit none
integer, parameter :: z(0) = 0
print *,minloc(z)
end program main
$ ./a.out
Fortran runtime error: Rank of array needs to be > 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Bug ID: 84697
Summary: minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #10 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
Created attachment 43557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43557&action=edit
fixed version of auxtypes.h which works under g++ and clang
Well if I fix things for clang then the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #9 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
I still do not understand why this constructor gets called: inline xstrbuf(
base_str s ). If I use .as_const() the result should be an xstr_const : public
xstr_abstract and not an xstr_mutable: public
xs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84667
--- Comment #8 from Elmar Stellnberger ---
concerning comment #4: Why do I not get the warning of utf8len being used
uninitialized? I have compiled with -Wall and -Wmaybe-uninitialized. This would
not be the first time that g++ does not notify m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
duplicate PR84670?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
70 matches
Mail list logo