https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035
--- Comment #2 from rvdv at vandewiele dot com ---
That would explain why different code is generated when it is removed.
I assumed it was always on because the "-Q --help=optimizers" output showed it
to be enabled.
Does this mean the option is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Comment #2 from Vegard Nossum ---
I have another test case which crashes in the same way and thus could be fixed
by your patch (I have not tried), but it looks quite different to me:
unsigned register a[] = {a - 1 && 1e9};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
:
$ cat spacejunk.cpp
typedef struct tt {
unsigned short h;
} tt;
void mainScreen(float a)
{
tt numlrect = {int(100/a)};
}
$ /opt/gcc/20180323/bin/g++ -c spacejunk.cpp -std=c++98
$ /opt/gcc/20180323/bin/g++ -c spacejunk.cpp
g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|ICE+SIGILL on val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 08:55:53 2018
New Revision: 258794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/85029
* sanopt.c (maybe_optimize_ubsan_ptr_if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 09:05:56 2018
New Revision: 258795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR inline-asm/85022
* alias.c (write_dependence_p): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84705
Vegard Nossum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vegard.nossum at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85034
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 09:10:02 2018
New Revision: 258796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR inline-asm/85034
* function.c (match_asm_constraints_1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85034
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] -O1 |[6/7 Regression] -O1
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] internal |[6/7 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
Bug ID: 85046
Summary: cp/name-lookup.c:6175:53: runtime error: member access
within null pointer of type 'struct cp_binding_level'
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80778
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 10:45:36 2018
New Revision: 258797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/80778
* gcc.dg/lto/pr80778_0.c: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80778
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
When compiling the following variant
module copy
use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only : int8
interface
module subroutine copy_byte_data( data, copy ) ! Chase's copier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Bug ID: 85047
Summary: cdd2a01 (and others) FAIL with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71965
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |9.0
Summary|[6/7/8 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 23 11:19:49 2018
New Revision: 258798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-23 Richard Biener
PR debug/85020
* dwarf2ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6)
> Created attachment 43736 [details]
> Tentative fix
>
> Richard, please give it a try, as specialist of weird build setups. ;-)
Seems to fix my problems!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, it worked around it by implementing char_traits a different way.
We also use these functions in , e.g. std::equal uses
__builtin_memcmp, and that needs to be constexpr too.
We could keep using Pedro'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85020
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 23 11:23:54 2018
New Revision: 258799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258799&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-23 Eric Botcazou
PR debug/85020
* gnat.dg/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048
Bug ID: 85048
Summary: [missed optimization] vector conversions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
Bug ID: 85049
Summary: Internal compiler error with __integer_pack
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz ---
Godbolt link:
https://godbolt.org/#z:OYLghAFBqd5QCxAYwPYBMCmBRdBLAF1QCcAaPECAKxAEZSAbAQwDtRkBSAJgCFufSAZ1QBXYskwgA5NwDMeFsgYisAag6yAwskEF8LAhuwcADAEFTZgpgC2AB2bX1WpU0GDVAFVKqFBVQByPn6qAMp4AF6YzgAigaoAVKqCkZi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
--- Comment #1 from AbigailBuccaneer ---
If `index_sequence_for` is replaced with `std::index_sequence_for` (and
`#include ` is added), this code compiles fine under g++-7, but not
g++-8 (where std::index_sequence_for is implemented in terms of _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe we could suppress the warning for explicit type conversions using
functional notation, i.e. A(a), when the copy constructor is user-provided.
It's not a perfect heuristic. It would still warn for (A)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Maybe we could suppress the warning for explicit type conversions using
> functional notation, i.e. A(a), when the copy constructor is user-provided.
>
> It's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83937
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes but only on trunk, it's also a regression on gcc-7-branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #23 from Pedro Alves ---
I think support in the compiler directly is likely to have better compile-time
performance, and I've stated from the beginning that I'd prefer that, FWIW.
OTOH, meanwhile, AFAICT, there's nothing preventing f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, but then we'd have *three* versions of std::equal: the default
implementation using a for-loop, the optimized one using memcmp for PODs, and
the constexpr form of the latter which also uses a for-loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #24)
> Also, the more work that the algorithm does, the more concerned I'd be that
> although the inputs are constant (and so we use the naive for-loop) the
> actu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.5.0
Summary|Substitution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This started to fail with r223301
DR 1391
* pt.c (type_unification_real): Check convertibility here.
(unify_one_argument): Not here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #26 from Pedro Alves ---
I'm confused then -- how does making __builtin_memcmp natively work on
constexpr contexts address the "but then we'd have *three* versions" concern?
Looking at the code, it does sound like you instead would w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Eric Fiselier from comment #2)
> Created attachment 43737 [details]
> reproducer2.cpp
>
> Another reproducer: This one is a regression from 7.3
> https://godbolt.org/g/UEti9f
>
> Could somebo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This caused a regression for the reproducer in PR 78489 comment 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #26)
> I'm confused then -- how does making __builtin_memcmp natively work on
> constexpr contexts address the "but then we'd have *three* versions" concern?
Because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #28 from Pedro Alves ---
> Looking at the code, it does sound like you instead would want to
> tweak __equal_aux to end up with __simple==false when all __equal_aux's
> arguments are constant.
I suspect that wouldn't work, because w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85050
Bug ID: 85050
Summary: Vectorized function - suboptimal gather
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #29 from Pedro Alves ---
OK, our messages crossed. Thanks for the clarification. I can't really
comment on the optimizers.
-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-258793-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180323 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I've tried to create a small reproducer that actually shows what
sw_absorption.F90 is doing (from the above URL, so not actually from the SPEC
provided sources) and can't reproduce a problem:
! PR middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78263
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, unfortunately we did not get to this yet. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85033
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 23 12:55:55 2018
New Revision: 258801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85033
* semantics.c (finish_offsetof): Don't all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 12:57:09 2018
New Revision: 258802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - Substitution in wrong order
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 12:57:09 2018
New Revision: 258802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - Substitution in wrong order
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #30 from Pedro Alves ---
> I suspect that wouldn't work, because we'd need to check whether the
> elements the iterator range point-to are themselves constant.
I would like to add that the char_traits trick handles this by doing exac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, I can actually reproduce the failure with the #c27 testcase with -Ofast
-fno-tree-pre.
So, to workaround this issue with SPEC, either we need to find out why PRE
peels off the first iteration on this sm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
Bug ID: 85052
Summary: Implement support for clang's __builtin_convertvector
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz ---
Just opened PR85052 for tracking __builtin_convertvector support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #28)
> So back to the constexpr __builtin_memcmp, or __constexpr_memcmp ideas.
>
> Though I still don't see how __constexpr_memcmp would make a difference wrt
> to nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #5 from Seth Johnson ---
That looks perfect, thank you for looking into this.
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> Is the following patch OK?
>
>return false;
> }
>
> - if (!is_c_interoperable (fptr,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Tried to enlarge the testcase, so it better matches what sw_absorption.F90
does, but still it works with -Ofast, just not with -Ofast -fno-tree-pre:
! PR middle-end/82004
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options "-Of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
> Ah, I can actually reproduce the failure with the #c27 testcase with -Ofast
> -fno-tree-pre.
>
> So, to workaround this issue with SPEC, either we need to fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Andrey, can you still reproduce and if yes, see what you get for the
sw_absorption.F90 loop after PRE (i.e. if the value of __builtin_pow (10, ...)
is precomputed for the first iteration and pow moved to lat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 23 13:45:49 2018
New Revision: 258804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85045
* c-pretty-print.c (c_pretty_printer::mult
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60458
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85053
Bug ID: 85053
Summary: free not listed as built-in
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84943
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85054
Bug ID: 85054
Summary: gcc8 fail to identify template redeclaration - problem
in string header
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
--- Comment #11 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Fri Mar 23 13:57:28 2018
New Revision: 258805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258805&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix pr84826.c failure for thumb1
*** gcc/testsuite/ChangeL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85053
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85055
Bug ID: 85055
Summary: warn on accessing free memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:19 2018
New Revision: 258807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82336 - link error with list-init default argument.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84355
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:25 2018
New Revision: 258808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84355 - ICE with deduction for member class template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:30 2018
New Revision: 258809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84798 - ICE with auto in abstract function declarator.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84937
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:54 2018
New Revision: 258812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84937 - ICE with class deduction and auto.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80227
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:47 2018
New Revision: 258811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80227 - SFINAE and negative array size.
* decl.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84839
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:36 2018
New Revision: 258810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84839 - ICE with decltype of parameter pack.
* pt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:40:00 2018
New Revision: 258813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71834 - template-id with too few arguments.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:40:06 2018
New Revision: 258814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - Substitution in wrong order
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:40:06 2018
New Revision: 258814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - Substitution in wrong order
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85005
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84355
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84647
Bug 84647 depends on bug 84798, which changed state.
Bug 84798 Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears
in a template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84349
Bug 84349 depends on bug 84798, which changed state.
Bug 84798 Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears
in a template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
