https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> The above snippet isn't a self-contained program and contains UB, so it is
> unclear how you can get runtime diagnostics for it.
The short snippet of code is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85147
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43812
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43812&action=edit
gcc8-pr85147.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164
Bug ID: 85164
Summary: poly-int.h:845:5: runtime error: signed integer
overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64920
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 64920, which changed state.
Bug 64920 Summary: bootstrap-ubsan [build/gengtype -r gtype.state]:
libiberty/regex.c:6970:11: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64920
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85164
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85156
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82494
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 85158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 85158, which changed state.
Bug 85158 Summary: ubsan and -O3 finds a problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82494
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I commented in the dup:
This code hasn't been fixed to avoid overflows and generally expects to operate
with infinite precision integers ... (you know, 32/64bits will be enough -
really!).
Fixing requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85165
Bug ID: 85165
Summary: gcc (and g++) not complaining about few unknown file
extensions like *.CC, *.Cc, *.cC
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85163
--- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> I can confirm it. However it's quite complex condition and I'm probably not
> planning to fix that.
Ok. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85141
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Without -fpermissive it is error-recovery ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85140
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43814
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43814&action=edit
gcc8-pr85140.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85166
Bug ID: 85166
Summary: [ntptx, libgfortran] Libgomp fortran tests using stop
in offloaded fns fail to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> There's related PR82494 about the lambda vector operations but yes, this
> code hasn't
> been fixed to avoid overflows and generally expects to operate with in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85127
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85167
Bug ID: 85167
Summary: shrink-wrap.c:333:15: runtime error with UBSAN
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As a middle-ground between ints, HOST_WIDE_INTs and unlimited precision we have
offset_int, widest_int etc. But perhaps using even that would be too costly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It is. This PR is about us not following the ABI. On trunk this code
is miscompiled; there is at least one other PR for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85135
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85168
Bug ID: 85168
Summary: ICE in tree-ssa-coalesce.c: SSA corruption: Unable to
coalesce ssa_names which are marked as MUST COALESCE
when -O2 is used
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-bec-linux |aarch64-bec-linux,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> As a middle-ground between ints, HOST_WIDE_IN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85168
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivo.raisr at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Unless someone can trigger this error or can prove that gfc_internal_error
> is available when the error ought to trigger, then please leave the
> code as is.
Would not it be better to use
gcc_unre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
>
> --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> It is. This PR is about us not followi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw-w64
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85134
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Indeed, started with r258015.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85133
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85145
--- Comment #2 from Jeroen Ooms ---
I'm building mingw-w64 on msys2. Not sure if this counts as a cross. The full
build script is given in the Github repo mentioned above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85159
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
But is this really valid code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85161
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85154
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 3 09:54:22 2018
New Revision: 259025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-03 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/85154
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85123
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I reopened PR85123 for the regression. Let's keep this bug for purely
the SYSV ABI non-compliance. This is not a regression (it is ancient).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85156
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is not just ICE, but also a wrong-code starting with GCC 4.3:
int x, y;
__attribute__((noipa)) int
foo (int z)
{
if (__builtin_expect (x ? y != 0 : 0, z++))
return 7;
return z;
}
int
main ()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Thanks, still can't reproduce here though. Can you check whether netbsd has
any patches ontop of FSF 6.4.0?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85134
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
cxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-259024-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180403 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85170
Bug ID: 85170
Summary: ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3139 (error:
could not split insn)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Klausner ---
Thank you for looking at this.
Yes, there are quite a number of changes in NetBSD's gcc:
http://danbala.tuwien.ac.at/~wiz/tmp/netbsd.gcc-6.4.0.diff.gz
(created by:
cd /usr/src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist
cvs d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
--- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #13)
> Actually it appears that the IVOPTS change results in worse code going into
> SMS, regardless of whether SMS can succeed on the loop. It comes down to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #5 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85169
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85169
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43819
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43819&action=edit
gcc8-pr85169.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85153
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Alemagna ---
@(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Confirmed. Not sure what the exact limit is but some of the warnings can
> only be disabled at function granularity and placing the pragmas in macros
> might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85168
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 43820
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43820&action=edit
patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85167
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85167
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85167
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43821&action=edit
gcc8-pr85167.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85171
Bug ID: 85171
Summary: generic lambda becomes recursive
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80654
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Frank Heckenbach from comment #8)
> (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #7)
> > That's not a bug. You need to make the copy constructor of s conditionally
> > deleted depending on whet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85172
Bug ID: 85172
Summary: internal compiler error: unexpected expression
'' of kind asm_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric at efcs dot ca
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77999
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Geary from comment #2)
> This is still present in g++ 5.3.0, and also affects
> std::literals::string_literals. The flag -Wno-literal-suffix does not turn
> it off.
It does for GCC 7+,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85173
Bug ID: 85173
Summary: ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 for
-fstack-clash-protection on ARM
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85171
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 43823
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43823&action=edit
member fn example
The second example shows the case inside a member fn, with ok and bad cases.
X::ok calls X:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Steffen Nurpmeso from comment #3)
> And despite absolutely idiotic C++ "improvements" like obsoleting the "auto"
> keyword and introducing override (yes) as a declaration suffix (no) that i
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64914
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71991
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85127
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG rejects it too:
"us.cc", line 11: error: template argument list must match the parameter list
void B::foo() {
^
1 error detected in the compilation of "us.cc".
I'm not aware of any rule mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85125
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85118
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ugh, this again. I've battled with this when working on the implementation of
std::bind. I'll try to reduce it to something independent of the library
headers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85174
Bug ID: 85174
Summary: c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c does not work
for powerpc with sdata
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85175
Bug ID: 85175
Summary: [8 regression] false-positive -Wformat-overflow=
warning with gcc-8 -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85169
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Looks obvious.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo