https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85336
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85336
Bug ID: 85336
Summary: [GCOV] wrong coverage for builtin functions and "||"
logic operators in return statement
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85335
Bug ID: 85335
Summary: Possible misuse of 'lang_GNU_OBJC' in
'default_floatn_builtin_p'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84797
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 43904
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43904&action=edit
version 2 patch
Missing documentation, doesn't handle architecture aliases, and only lets your
specify one ABI, bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85334
Bug ID: 85334
Summary: Shadow stack isn't unwound properly through signal
handler
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #16)
> (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #15)
> > Because the ABI says so.
>
> Which ABI? In https://www.uclibc.org/docs/psABI-i386.pdf I see
>
> long long: sizeof
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85333
Bug ID: 85333
Summary: [GCOV] Builtin function is wrongly marked as "-" in
gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10360
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85332
Bug ID: 85332
Summary: [GCOV] wrong coverage with do-while in swith-case
statement
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 43903
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43903&action=edit
proposed fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69763
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85331
--- Comment #1 from Suhua Lei ---
Reproduce with this test case:
typedef long int64_t;
typedef double vecf __attribute__((vector_size(2 * sizeof(double;
void fn1() {
vecf *r;
vecf y = {};
__attribute__((__vector_size__(2 * sizeof(int64
/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/suhua/compilers/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180410 (experimental) [trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85330
Bug ID: 85330
Summary: -Os generates bigger code than -O2 due to disabled
strlen pass
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|jason at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Apr 10 22:34:06 2018
New Revision: 259303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2018-04-10 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/70808
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321
--- Comment #4 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Tue Apr 10 22:05:41 2018
New Revision: 259302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-10 Aaron Sawdey
PR target/85321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85287
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85287
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Apr 10 21:37:34 2018
New Revision: 259299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix stack clash for big residuals (PR85287)
The stack clash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
...
> If you eventually expect a true result then please no - this should be
> undefined.
The second test case in comment #4 is currently well-defined in C17 (b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So this leaves:
-mblock-compare-inline-limit - option not documented in manual
-mblock-compare-inline-loop-limit - likewise
-mcall-* - possible values are not listed in --help=target
-mstring-compare-in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 10, 2018 4:50:49 PM GMT+02:00, "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315
>
>Martin Sebor changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 10, 2018 5:58:32 PM GMT+02:00, "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238
>
>--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> So we in additional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85327
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85329
Bug ID: 85329
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group, at
symtab.c:460
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85328
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85328
Bug ID: 85328
Summary: accessing ymm16 with non-avx512 instruction form
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Apr 10 18:54:08 2018
New Revision: 259296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Improve --help=target (PR85321)
This updates the help text
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85327
Bug ID: 85327
Summary: [8 regression] experimental/source_location/1.cc began
failing with r259278
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326
Bug ID: 85326
Summary: `make check` fails with `--disable-bootstrap` and
`--enable-languages=c`
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
--- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen ---
Created attachment 43901
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43901&action=edit
inline dump
Prior attachment was r257581 dump. This is r257582 dump.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
--- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen ---
Created attachment 43900
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43900&action=edit
inline dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen ---
A little more detail. 48t.fnsplit splits mainGtU() into 2 functions:
mainGtU(): which contains a few early exit tests and then a call to
mainGtU.part.0()
mainGtU.part.0(): contains the remainder of mainGtU(),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
In fact, there is sort-of an inconsistency in build_zero_init_1 which explains
the inconsistency in the original testcase:
else if (TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (type))
init = fold (convert (type, nullptr_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 10 17:19:09 2018
New Revision: 259291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259291&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/65821 - wrong location for main().
* call.c (cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
NB: I played only with the *second* testcase, under the assumption that it was
the a reduced version of the original one but likely that isn't the case. I'll
check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85325
Bug ID: 85325
Summary: ICE on class template partial specialization for c++17
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Right!
Unpoisoning before restoring SP looks like a reasonable and simple solution to
me. I don't see any potential downsides.
Do you mind submitting a fix for this?
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85314
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85238
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So we in additional to that require a target hook that can be queried
> from dwarf2out_early_finish () to disable the output of the sections.
> Or somehow query the simple-object capability there.
Can't w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 10 15:31:57 2018
New Revision: 259285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/85300
* combine.c (subst): Handle subs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
--- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #35)
> I have opened a new bug for the ABI regression.
That's PR 85222 and is now fixed on trunk, so comment 32 works again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le |powerpc*-*-*
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
This time it's probably not a round off:
(gdb) p callee_info->time
$1 = {m_sig = 1174405118, m_exp = -25}
(gdb) p callee_info->time.to_double()
$2 = 34.99940395355
(gdb) p edge_time.to_double()
$3 = 54.99
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85324
Bug ID: 85324
Summary: missing constant propagation on SSE/AVX conversion
intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:37:09 2018
New Revision: 259282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Show pertinent parameter (PR c++/85110)
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Honza, could you please have a look once you are done with the P1s?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:36:09 2018
New Revision: 259281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/85222 allow catching iostream errors as gcc4-compatible
ios
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85279
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:29:52 2018
New Revision: 259280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85279 - dump_expr doesn't understand decltype.
* e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85262
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85312
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:28:54 2018
New Revision: 259279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85312 - P0962 cleanup
* parser.c (cp_parser_perform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85285
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 regression] |[6/7 regression] incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85285
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:23:54 2018
New Revision: 259277
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85285 - ICE with flexible array after substitution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:24:00 2018
New Revision: 259278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/65821 - wrong location for main().
* call.c (cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85313
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:04:37 2018
New Revision: 259275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85313
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_do): Remove bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Apr 10 13:52:23 2018
New Revision: 259274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix obvious error in handling of error attribute (PR lto/85248).
2018-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Apr 10 13:40:35 2018
New Revision: 259273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-10 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/24314
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85311
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vis...@royal-caliber.com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58479
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even with LVUs if I try the #c0 testcase with outer 3 loops commented out (so
only 8x8 unrolling) and with a single dimension array rather than 3 dimensional
one, i.e.:
int d, e, f;
int
main ()
{
for (d =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85190
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Apr 10 13:11:40 2018
New Revision: 259272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR testsuite/85190
* gcc.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz ---
Created attachment 43898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43898&action=edit
idea for a partial solution
Constant propagation works using the built in shift operators. At least for the
sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Apr 10 13:05:24 2018
New Revision: 259271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/84748: Mark *compare_cstore_insn as cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323
Bug ID: 85323
Summary: SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85322
Bug ID: 85322
Summary: [8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failured
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84748
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Apr 10 12:59:08 2018
New Revision: 259270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/84748: Mark *compare_cstore_insn as cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85204
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85177
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85255
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 10 12:37:36 2018
New Revision: 259269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85177
PR target/85255
* config/i386/sse.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85177
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 10 12:37:36 2018
New Revision: 259269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85177
PR target/85255
* config/i386/sse.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85080
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
I'll see if I can make time to look at this one soon. I suspect the new
peeling costs check from Robin just made this test invalid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 43897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43897&action=edit
r254012 with peeling disabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 43896
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43896&action=edit
r254011 with peeling disabled
The other differences look like RA/scheduling in the end the stack frame in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85320
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85321
Bug ID: 85321
Summary: Missing documentation and option misc for ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85075
--- Comment #4 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho ---
(In reply to Ulrich Weigand from comment #3)
> Maybe I'm confused, but: How does this even build?
It does not. There is an ICE before the build error message appears.
> _Float128 is a C-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85320
Bug ID: 85320
Summary: Segmentation fault when building XKAAPI
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
