https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85674
Bug ID: 85674
Summary: ICE insn_min_length, at config/rs6000/rs6000.md:6661
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85659
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun May 6 21:52:25 2018
New Revision: 259982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85659
* cfgexpand.c (expand_asm_stmt): Don't create
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85659
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun May 6 21:14:35 2018
New Revision: 259981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85659
* cfgexpand.c (expand_asm_stmt): Don't create
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85664
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85673
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
The config file looks like this:
/* Define if __float128 is supported on this host. */
# define _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 0
#if !defined(__FLOAT128__) && !defined(__SIZEOF_FLOAT128__)
#undef _GLIBCXX_USE_FLO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I think there is an inconsistency where we #define _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 0 (can
you check your c++config.h?) to say that it shouldn't be supported, but then
test with #ifdef and not #if.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
I've started to work on a new patch according to review feedbacks. I've reached
the stage where I can compile without -fPIC with the stack protect test being
an UNSPEC split after register allocation as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85673
Bug ID: 85673
Summary: ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-invalid-code
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #2 from Douglas Mencken ---
reverting of Michael’s patch gives
/Developer/GCC/7.3p/PowerPC/32bit/bin/g++ -std=gnu++98 -fno-PIE -c
-DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -g -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasync
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
Bug ID: 85672
Summary: error: redefinition of 'constexpr long double
std::abs(long double)'
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85665
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> It might be better to report multiple bugs, one per target backend, so that
> the relevant target maintainers are informed.
Oh, I tried that last year. Of the 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85671
Bug ID: 85671
Summary: Lack of `std::move()` inside `operator/` for
`std::filesystem::path`.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #1 from Douglas Mencken ---
May this https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/838856/ is related?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85670
Bug ID: 85670
Summary: `std::filesystem` does not compile on mingw-w64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #12 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
Bug ID: 85669
Summary: fail on s-case-cfn-macros: build/gencfn-macros:
DEF_INTERNAL_FLT_FN (%smth%) has no associated
built-in functions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507
--- Comment #19 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun May 6 12:33:07 2018
New Revision: 259979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-05-06 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Revision: 259978
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sun May 6 12:20:52 2018
--
--- svn:log (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Revision: 259978
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sun May 6 12:20:52 2018
--
--- svn:log (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507
--- Comment #18 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Revision: 259978
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Sun May 6 12:20:52 2018
--
--- svn:log (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
--- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun May 6 12:14:11 2018
New Revision: 259978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81773
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun May 6 12:14:11 2018
New Revision: 259978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-04-28 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85668
Bug ID: 85668
Summary: ICE with substitution failure
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507
--- Comment #17 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun May 6 11:52:46 2018
New Revision: 259977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-05-06 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85588
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85664
--- Comment #4 from Mysha ---
> The suggestions are eminently useful...
Which is why I said I would prefer to have a --terse option. After all, having
such an option implies that you can choose not to use them.
> If you don't like getting too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507
--- Comment #16 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Sun May 6 11:19:31 2018
New Revision: 259974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2018-05-06 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67650
--- Comment #31 from Vincent ---
It turns out we might be in front of two bugs actually. With 8.1 I have a new
diagnosis for this 67650 bug (definition missing at compile time, not just at
link edition time), but I do have other parts of my old c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85664
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at mailed dot e4ward.com
--- C
31 matches
Mail list logo