[Bug c++/85763] Feature request: Add a suggestion when compilation fails dues to ambiguous templated friend function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85763 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85764] New: bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85764 Bug ID: 85764 Summary: bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85763] New: Feature request: Add a suggestion when compilation fails dues to ambiguous templated friend function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85763 Bug ID: 85763 Summary: Feature request: Add a suggestion when compilation fails dues to ambiguous templated friend function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/85762] New: [8/9 Regression] range-v3 abstraction overhead not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85762 Bug ID: 85762 Summary: [8/9 Regression] range-v3 abstraction overhead not optimized away Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/61257] configure should check if sys/sdt.h is usable, not just checking the existance of the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, patch

[Bug c++/85761] New: ICE on invalid in rtl with uncaptured constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85761 Bug ID: 85761 Summary: ICE on invalid in rtl with uncaptured constexpr Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/85542] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85542] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 12 17:17:19 2018 New Revision: 260198 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260198=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-12 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85542] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 12 16:57:28 2018 New Revision: 260197 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260197=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-12 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85542] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in check_inquiry, at fortran/expr.c:2426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85542 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 12 16:39:57 2018 New Revision: 260196 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260196=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-12 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #2 from Jere --- I was unable to attach main.s, which was generated using -v and -save-temps The attachment submitter said it could not attach it because it was empty.

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #1 from Jere --- Created attachment 44123 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44123=edit Test Case 1 This is a test case used to reproduce the crash. Crashes in 7.2, 7.3, and GPL 2017

[Bug ada/85760] New: Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 Bug ID: 85760 Summary: Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/68846] Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the assignment regards a dummy argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 12 15:33:24 2018 New Revision: 260195 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260195=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68846 PR

[Bug fortran/70864] internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 12 15:33:24 2018 New Revision: 260195 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260195=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68846 PR

[Bug other/61257] configure should check if sys/sdt.h is usable, not just checking the existance of the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257 --- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2) > Having explicit flags like --enable-systemtap / --disable-systemtap (glibc > has those) would fix the issue. Proposed upstream as:

[Bug lto/85759] New: ICE output_profile_summary, at lto-cgraph.c:706 using -profile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85759 Bug ID: 85759 Summary: ICE output_profile_summary, at lto-cgraph.c:706 using -profile-use Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85573] gcc 7.3.0 cannot compile recent LLVM for AMD GPU shaders

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85573 Sylvain Bertrand changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85750] [6/7/8/9 Regression] Default initialization of derived type array missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85750 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/85758] questionable bitwise folding (missing single use check?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85758 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Direct translation would be (from clang): andl%ecx, %edx addl%edx, %edi xorl%ecx, %edx addl%edx, %esi With -mbmi, I get andn%ecx, %edx, %eax

[Bug c++/82899] *this in constructors could not alias with reference input parameters of the same type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899 --- Comment #20 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 44122 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44122=edit untested middle-end patch This works on the testcase, I need to add a comment and run it through the testsuite.

[Bug c++/82899] *this in constructors could not alias with reference input parameters of the same type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899 --- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18) > I suppose this changes debug information? Yes. Probably not so bad, but indeed better if we can avoid it. > I think adjusting the only user in

[Bug tree-optimization/85757] tree optimizers fail to fully clean up fixed-size memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85757 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85740] Non-optimal determining maximum in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 44121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44121=edit Test case for vectorizing, inc. assembly This test case, written by Nicolas König, shows a proof of concept for

[Bug c++/82899] *this in constructors could not alias with reference input parameters of the same type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On May 11, 2018 11:20:41 PM GMT+02:00, "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82899 > >Marc Glisse changed: > >

[Bug middle-end/85740] Non-optimal determining maximum in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > > Confirmed with a Haswell CPU as well. Without the __builtin_expect we > > rightfully predict the branch to be

[Bug other/61257] configure should check if sys/sdt.h is usable, not just checking the existance of the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/85758] New: questionable bitwise folding (missing single use check?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85758 Bug ID: 85758 Summary: questionable bitwise folding (missing single use check?) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/85756] [9 regression] wrong code at -Os on x86-64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85756 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/85757] New: tree optimizers fail to fully clean up fixed-size memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85757 Bug ID: 85757 Summary: tree optimizers fail to fully clean up fixed-size memcpy Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

Your Weekly Breeze - May. 10 - May. 16

This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online: https://ymlpsend3.com/z5Pw7t