[Bug fortran/85836] [meta-bug] Fortran 2018 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85836 Bug 85836 depends on bug 84894, which changed state. Bug 84894 Summary: [F2018] provide ISO_Fortran_binding.h https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84894 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/84894] [F2018] provide ISO_Fortran_binding.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84894 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84894] [F2018] provide ISO_Fortran_binding.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84894 --- Comment #3 from Damian Rouson --- Oxford University graduate student Daniel Celis Garza has been working on this for the bulk of his 11-week visit with me, which ends next week. For reasons motivated largely by the difficulty of coaxing the G

[Bug fortran/82275] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid reference to dimension-remapped type SELECT TYPE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275 --- Comment #9 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks, Paul! Damian

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 23 03:52:49 2018 New Revision: 260562 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260562&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/85866 - error with .* in default template arg. * p

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 23 03:53:14 2018 New Revision: 260564 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260564&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/85866 - error with .* in default template arg. * p

[Bug c++/81420] When a reference is bound to a member in the base of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 23 03:52:56 2018 New Revision: 260563 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260563&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81420 - not extending temporary lifetime. * call.c

[Bug c++/66476] Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from temporary initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/49213] [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213 Neil Carlson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.0.1 |8.1.1 --- Comment #27 from Neil Carlson

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 Neil Carlson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug tree-optimization/85700] Spurious -Wstringop-truncation warning with strncat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85700 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/85883] New: class template argument deduction fails in new-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85883 Bug ID: 85883 Summary: class template argument deduction fails in new-expression Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug tree-optimization/85882] Value of local variable changes unintentionally if certain optimization are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Component|c++

[Bug c++/85882] Value of local variable changes unintentionally if certain optimization are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882 mednafen at sent dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mednafen at sent dot com --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/85712] [8/9 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable_1 at gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- Proposed patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg01183.html

[Bug fortran/85868] Subarray of a pointer array associated with a pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/85882] Value of local variable changes unintentionally if certain optimization are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Bolus --- btw. The code in the example is an adaption from Apache Thrift.

[Bug c++/85882] Value of local variable changes unintentionally if certain optimization are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Bolus --- Created attachment 44169 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44169&action=edit Example to reproduce the error.

[Bug c++/85882] New: Value of local variable changes unintentionally if certain optimization are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85882 Bug ID: 85882 Summary: Value of local variable changes unintentionally if certain optimization are enabled Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/81953] Code sinking increases register pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81953 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/85814] [8 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: strlen -O3 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85814 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug testsuite/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 --- Comment #6 from Carl Love --- Printing the results rather then aborting, we see the value of ib[1] and ib[3] are swapped; ib[2] and ib[4] are swapped, then ib[5] and ib[7] are swapped and ib[6] and ib[8] are swapped. The pattern continues.

[Bug c++/80485] rejects-valid: constexpr static_cast of pointer-to-member-function to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 44167 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44167&action=edit proposed fix https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00968.html

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue May 22 20:05:53 2018 New Revision: 260555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260555&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 * gf

[Bug c++/80485] rejects-valid: constexpr static_cast of pointer-to-member-function to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/85877] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/85880] Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 --- Comment #4 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- Ok, you are probably right. I just was surprised that all GCC 4,5,6,7 gave same result, but something changed with 8. But you are right, its unpredictable results since its undefined. I practice it ga

[Bug middle-end/85643] attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-truncation warning at an offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85643] attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-truncation warning at an offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 22 19:46:44 2018 New Revision: 260553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260553&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/85643 - attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-trunc

[Bug middle-end/85359] duplicate -Wstringop-overflow for a strcmp call with a nonstring pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85359 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85359] duplicate -Wstringop-overflow for a strcmp call with a nonstring pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85359 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 22 19:37:48 2018 New Revision: 260550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260550&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/85359 - duplicate -Wstringop-overflow for a strcmp call with

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug testsuite/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 --- Comment #5 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 44166 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44166&action=edit diff file The attachment is a side by side diff of good code and bad code. It shows the difference in the code gen

[Bug middle-end/85881] New: [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr80481.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-not vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85881 Bug ID: 85881 Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr80481.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-not vmovaps Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/85345] Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue May 22 19:10:34 2018 New Revision: 260547 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260547&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't mark IFUNC resolver as only called directly Since IFUNC reso

[Bug testsuite/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 Luis Machado changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85833] [AVX512] use mask registers instructions instead of scalar code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85833 --- Comment #3 from Wojciech Mula --- Uroš, thank you very much. I didn't pay attention on the AVX512 variant, as I thought this is so basic instruction that it should be available from AVX512F.

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #8) > Since this change (r260433), I've noticed that: > UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/vect/pr52580.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect > "LOOP VECTORIZED" 1 Thos

[Bug middle-end/85880] Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see any value in this bug report. Undefined code changes behavior (and code generation) between different versions of GCC all the time. In your example, GCC could have decided to just return -1 for

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue May 22 18:22:29 2018 New Revision: 260544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260544&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 * gf

[Bug middle-end/85880] Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 --- Comment #2 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- All old GCC < 8 --- Disassembly of section .text: : 0: 2000movsr0, #0 2: 4770bx lr 0004 : 4: b500push{lr}

[Bug c/85880] Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 --- Comment #1 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- Created attachment 44165 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44165&action=edit Makefile

[Bug c/85880] New: Different code generation for uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85880 Bug ID: 85880 Summary: Different code generation for uninitialized variables Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug fortran/85879] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85879 Bug ID: 85879 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5405 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85878] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878 Bug ID: 85878 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:287 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/85877] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877 Bug ID: 85877 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2449 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85544] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85544 --- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz --- For special case +-1 : $ cat zz1.f90 program p integer, parameter :: na = -3, ne = 10 integer :: i, a(na:ne), b(na:ne) a = [(i, i=na, ne)] b = [1**a] end $ gfortran-9-20180520 -c zz1.f90 -O2 zz1

[Bug rtl-optimization/85876] New: ICE in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6164

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85876 Bug ID: 85876 Summary: ICE in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6164 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/85623] strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Patch committed to trunk in r260541.

[Bug c/85623] strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 22 17:45:35 2018 New Revision: 260541 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260541&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/85623 - strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -W

[Bug c++/85875] -Weffc++ can't understand auto return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85875 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/85814] [8 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: strlen -O3 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85814 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue May 22 17:32:37 2018 New Revision: 260540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260540&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix tree-ssa-strlen handling of partial clobbers (PR8581

[Bug c++/85875] New: -Weffc++ can't understand auto return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85875 Bug ID: 85875 Summary: -Weffc++ can't understand auto return values Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/80318] GCC takes too much RAM and time compiling a template file (var-tracking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Strict overflow warnings are just so badly implemented ...

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schneider --- If I add -Wsystem-headers I get: In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:822, from ../lib/replace/replace.h:40, from ../lib/util/debug.c:22: /usr/include/bits/stdlib

[Bug rtl-optimization/80318] GCC takes too much RAM and time compiling a template file (var-tracking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80318 benjamin.redelings at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.1 |8.1.0 --- Comment #

[Bug c/85874] gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Does that change if you use -Wsystem-headers?

[Bug c/85874] New: gcc points to wrong location when displaying error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85874 Bug ID: 85874 Summary: gcc points to wrong location when displaying error Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug tree-optimization/85697] At -Os nontrivial ctor does not use SSE to zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85697 --- Comment #2 from Mike Sharov --- I previously filed bug #49127 about the non-SSE version of the same xor/mov optimization. Perhaps both could be addressed in the same manner with a more general capability of zeroing with a register when doing

[Bug c++/85873] New: [8 regression] GCC omits array constant in .rodata causing a segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85873 Bug ID: 85873 Summary: [8 regression] GCC omits array constant in .rodata causing a segmentation fault. Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug tree-optimization/85826] [9 Regression] ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict on a variable-length struct starting with r260280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85826] [9 Regression] ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict on a variable-length struct starting with r260280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 22 15:22:16 2018 New Revision: 260537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85826 - ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restruct on a varia

[Bug tree-optimization/85826] [9 Regression] ICE in gimple-ssa-warn-restrict on a variable-length struct starting with r260280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85826 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Fixed via r260537.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] [9 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug c++/61806] [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in partial template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std/builds/310/steps/test.libcxx/logs/FAIL%3A%20libc%2B%2B%3A%3Adeduct.pass.cpp

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #8) > UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/vect/pr52580.f -O scan-tree-dump-times vect > "LOOP VECTORIZED" 1 In addition to this one, I also see: UNRESOLVED: gfor

[Bug tree-optimization/85712] [8/9 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable_1 at gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85712 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- There are six vulnerabilities like this in the SLSR code: replace_mult_candidate (2) replace_rhs_if_not_dup (1) replace_one_candidate (3) I'll work on a fix.

[Bug c++/61806] [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in partial template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-09-25 00:00:00 |2018-5-22 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug libgcc/85869] libgcc fails to build in canadian cross: cet.h not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85869 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|build | Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug c/85870] [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- I'll try to see if I can isolate that. We run the tests on arm, aarch64, x86_32 and x86_64 all native targets. We post the results to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ as "LINARO TCWG"

[Bug c++/85867] Subscript operator applied to an temporary array results in an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85867 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79832] [C++14/17] result of subscripting non lvalue array should be xvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/85870] [6/7/8/9 Regression][LTO1] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85870 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction CC|

[Bug c++/79832] [C++14/17] result of subscripting non lvalue array should be xvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79832 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced: template _Up __declval(int); template _Tp __declval(long); template auto declval() noexcept -> decltype(__declval<_Tp>(0)); template using void_t = void;

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2) > Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs. > > As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing. > > And it

[Bug middle-end/85872] False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85872 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Yes I had spotted this part of gcov.exp, but saw nothing in the logs. As I put in the title, it happens randomly, and this is automated testing. And it seems there is no way increasing verbosity will prin

[Bug c++/85847] [6/7/8/9 Regression] unexpected expression of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/85866] [8/9 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/85864] [8/9 Regression] template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85180] Infinite loop in RTL DSE optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85180 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 85862 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/85862] infinite loop in find_base_term()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85862 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/85872] New: False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85872 Bug ID: 85872 Summary: False positive for -Wmaybe-unitialized Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/85860] [8/9 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.c:1810: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/85859] [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/85859] [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/85857] configure problem using local mpfr and gmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85857 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- So it looks like mpfr uses internal interfaces for DFP? --with-gmp-build was stronly discouraged back in time... Also in-tree mpfr and system gmp is a combination that currently works (but not with DFP the

[Bug tree-optimization/82726] ICE in verify_ssa during GIMPLE pass: pcom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82726 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85855] [7/8/9 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [6 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #58 from Andrew Jenner --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #57) > Andrew, could you refresh your patch for the current trunk branch? > > It doesn't fully apply for me. Acknowledged. I will try to get to that late

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] [9 Regression] ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #12 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > It's simply not how C++ works. Quite right. I already agreed with you here; we are arguing about whether it /should/ work this way :) > An object's lifetime i

  1   2   >