https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65416
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #21 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> If this bug is fixed, then it should no longer be necessary to explicitly
> specify -Wno-overlength-strings when building GCC itself. I could submit a
> patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86070
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85792
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82728
Bug 82728 depends on bug 85963, which changed state.
Bug 85963 Summary: [8/9 Regression] false positive "set but not used" warning
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85710
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86114
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86114
Bug ID: 86114
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimple_fold_builtin_strlen
with an invalid call to strnlen
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85710
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:25 2018
New Revision: 261465
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261465=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85710 - ICE with -Wmemset-elt-size.
c-family/
* c-warn.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85792
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:37 2018
New Revision: 261467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261467=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85792 -Wctor-dtor-privacy and inherited constructor.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:19 2018
New Revision: 261464
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261464=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/61806 - missed SFINAE with partial specialization.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:31 2018
New Revision: 261466
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261466=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85963 - -Wunused-but-set with ?: in template.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:13 2018
New Revision: 261463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261463=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85765 - SFINAE and non-type default template arg.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85815
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:01:55 2018
New Revision: 261460
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261460=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85815 - reference to member of enclosing template.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85764
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:07 2018
New Revision: 261462
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261462=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85764 - bogus 'this' not captured error.
* lambda.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85807
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:02:01 2018
New Revision: 261461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261461=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85807 - ICE with call in template NSDMI.
* init.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85792
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 21:49:36 2018
New Revision: 261459
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261459=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85792 -Wctor-dtor-privacy and inherited constructor.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 21:49:30 2018
New Revision: 261458
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261458=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/85963 - -Wunused-but-set with ?: in template.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86113
Bug ID: 86113
Summary: __builtin_nan has "const" attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86112
Bug ID: 86112
Summary: Python printers don't work on Python 2.6
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86110
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86111
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Wow, how has it been 4 years already? Maybe this time around then. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86083
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 86083, which changed state.
Bug 86083 Summary: handle non-constant assignments in strlen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86083
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86083
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jun 11 20:01:40 2018
New Revision: 261452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261452=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86083 - handle non-constant assignments in strlen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86111
Bug ID: 86111
Summary: ICE in gfc_arith_concat, at fortran/arith.c:985
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86110
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Detected :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
character(:), allocatable :: x, y
x = 'abc'
y = [x]
end
$ gfortran-9-20180610 -c z3.f90
z3.f90:4:3:
y = [x]
1
Error: Incompatible ranks 0 and 1 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86110
Bug ID: 86110
Summary: ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at
fortran/array.c:2044
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #3 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 18:56:56 2018
New Revision: 261449
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261449=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/80485 - inline function non-zero address.
* symtab.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80271
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Adam Borowski from comment #6)
> Created attachment 44260 [details]
> patch for CLICOLOR_FORCE
>
> So, here's a patch.
Please send patches to the gcc-patches mailing list for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
r261448 fixed comments 16 and 17.
Still open: Comment 19.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jun 11 18:44:38 2018
New Revision: 261448
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261448=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-11 Janus Weil
PR fortran/45521
* interface.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 18:40:14 2018
New Revision: 261445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261445=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86094 - wrong code with defaulted move ctor.
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 11 18:38:52 2018
New Revision: 261444
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261444=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86094 - wrong code with defaulted move ctor.
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Jun 11 18:25:37 2018
New Revision: 261442
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261442=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-06-08 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Jun 11 18:23:28 2018
New Revision: 261441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261441=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-06-08 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> -fabi-version=12 is not documented, not mentioned in release notes, and not
> wired up in -Wabi.
-Wabi=11 warns about this. With an incorrect message,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80271
Adam Borowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilobyte at angband dot pl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109
Bug ID: 86109
Summary: [GCOV] gcov reports lines in lambdas as not executable
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'm not familiar enough with the ccfsm bits to know if there's something we
ought to be doing generically to improve CC handling further. I think
downgrading to P2 certainly makes sense though.
However,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> > It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599,
> > it is just similar.
>
> What is different?
Is "different chunks of code are required" good
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Jun 11 16:06:49 2018
New Revision: 261436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261436=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-06-11 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Jun 11 15:48:48 2018
New Revision: 261435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261435=gcc=rev
Log:
rs6000: Put constraints on the correct operand in movdi (PR85755)
Some of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
Right, this was fixed by r261367.
Thanks and sorry for the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
Bug ID: 86108
Summary: crash during unwinding with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 07:01:47AM +, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571
>
> Christophe Lyon changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86102
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
Hi Jonathan
I can see what you mean, it doesn't make sense to add more info now I see.
Thank you for closing this request as invalid.
Jonny
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82906
Anders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||podbot88 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
-fabi-version=12 is not documented, not mentioned in release notes, and not
wired up in -Wabi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
--- Comment #35 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> gfc_warning(OPT_Wsurprising, "Impure function %qs at %L may not be
> evaluated", ...)
I am perfectly happy with the short-circuit evaluation and I don't want any
warning when I use -Wall.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jun 11 11:47:00 2018
New Revision: 261434
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261434=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix typo done in MPX removal (PR tree-optimization/86089).
2018-06-11 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It is not actually a complete duplicate of PR 85599,
> it is just similar.
What is different?
IMO the two PRs should be closed as WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is controlled by -fabi-version=12 (the default in gcc 8).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86097
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86102
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #2)
> There is no benefit from displaying 'value' '"test"' or 'str' ?
Right. In this case they're short strings, but the arguments to a function can
be arbitrary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107
Bug ID: 86107
Summary: ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:42301
with -O -funroll-loops -mavx5124fmaps -mmitigate-rop
--param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #59 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Andrew Jenner from comment #58)
> Acknowledged. I will try to get to that later this week.
Any news on this?
News from Debian's side is that we have upgraded build capacity for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86106
Bug ID: 86106
Summary: powerpc: Suboptimal logical operation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #12 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> Patch candidate sent here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00546.html
Thanks for the patch, Martin. I checked that our code works again also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cortez ---
Created attachment 44257
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44257=edit
bug.cpp
simplified test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85963
Michael Cortez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Patch candidate sent here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00546.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #10 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I can confirm that re-introducing the line
case BUILT_IN_STRCPY_CHK:
in lines 619/20 in tree-ssa-strlen.c does indeed solve this problem and also
the problem (ICE) with our code reported in PR86103.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86101
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 69368 ***
Thanks Andrew!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 86103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86103
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86089
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86104
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well DI is an invalid mode for mem address. I don't know if __RTL support
should be considered a valid input at all or even consider all invalid input as
not iceing a valid bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86104
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
86 matches
Mail list logo
