https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 13 14:31:17 2018
New Revision: 261551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85703
gcc/fortran/
* parse.c (decode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 13 14:29:04 2018
New Revision: 261550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85702
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135
Bug ID: 86135
Summary: At run time, when the constructor tries to construct
an objects element with a initializer-list (using
c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86119
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86127
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86099
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86116
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86127
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Also your test is flawed.
>
> (In reply to Scott Constable from comment #0)
> > forward_list test
> > ==
>
> These all come from the default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86115
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86117
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86127
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86127
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The allocator requirements say that move construction must be equivalent to
copy construction, and allocators should be cheap to copy anyway. I don't
consider this a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86133
--- Comment #1 from Kiran Alladi ---
I am trying to compile the code with -mno-spe but still it seems that compiler
is generating spe instructions.
~/kiran$ cat test.c
double var_double = 0;
long var_long = 0;
void my_func( double var_val )
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|earlier error causes|earlier diagnostic causes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86133
Bug ID: 86133
Summary: powerpc (-mcpu=8548) internal compiler error for
double variables
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
Bug ID: 86134
Summary: earlier error causes followup diagnostic about unknown
-Wno-* options
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnosti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 13 11:22:17 2018
New Revision: 261545
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261545&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86048
* config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_col
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 13 11:20:23 2018
New Revision: 261544
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261544&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86048
* config/i386/winnt.c (i386_pe_seh_col
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86132
Bug ID: 86132
Summary: Failure to elide condition known to be non-null
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #5 from Douglas Mencken ---
Bisecting is hard, because commits before
15adae8bbeb4579910eadf636e3b06f3dae4a342 “ PR bootstrap/82939
* line-map.c (linemap_init): Avoid broken value-init when compiling with GCC
4.2 ”
segfault on genmatc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86131
Bug ID: 86131
Summary: powerpc: gcc uses costly multiply instead of shift
left
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118
--- Comment #4 from Александр Кроль ---
1. tar -x -M --file=idfs1.tar.gz ./idfs.ii.bz2
Prepare volume #2 for ‘idfs1.tar.gz’ and hit return: n idfs2.tar.gz
2. bunzip2 ./idfs.ii.bz2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86130
Bug ID: 86130
Summary: Expect SIGBUS but program just silently exits
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86128
Bug ID: 86128
Summary: ice in get_string_length, at tree-ssa-strlen.c:653
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86067
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
