https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86095
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86095
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 16 06:52:17 2018
New Revision: 261680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86095
* common.opt (Wunsafe-loop-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86095
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 16 06:51:32 2018
New Revision: 261679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86095
* common.opt (Wunsafe-loop-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jun 16 06:50:31 2018
New Revision: 261678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/86108
* bb-reorder.c (create_forwarder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86147
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 16 06:35:53 2018
New Revision: 261676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86147 - wrong capture for template argument.
* exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86147
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 16 06:35:53 2018
New Revision: 261676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86147 - wrong capture for template argument.
* exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86147
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 16 06:36:19 2018
New Revision: 261677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86147 - wrong capture for template argument.
* exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86172
Bug ID: 86172
Summary: [meta-bug] issues with -Wnull-dereference
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, meta-bug
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77432
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #58 from Martin Sebor ---
It's fine with me, just as long as we don't lose track of any outstanding bugs.
trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20180615 (experimental) [trunk revision 261626] (GCC)
$ g++-trunk abc.c
abc.c: In substitution of ‘template using B = typename A::A [with T =
short int]’:
abc.c:4:8: required from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86147
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 20:53:54 2018
New Revision: 261663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/86093
* c-typeck.c (pointer_diff): Cast both pointers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 20:37:46 2018
New Revision: 261660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85878
* expr.c (expand_assignment): Remove n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 20:36:38 2018
New Revision: 261659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/85878
* expr.c (expand_assignment): Remove n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So - all process_options () option post-processing should go away and be moved
> to finish_options ()?
I think reducing the amount d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
Er, a new PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
A new testcase would have been good, but those testcases are also fixed, now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 15 20:23:13 2018
New Revision: 261658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82882 - ICE with lambda in template default argument.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 15 20:22:44 2018
New Revision: 261654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261654&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82882 - ICE with lambda in template default argument.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Joseph, do you agree that the following shouldn't fail the compilation?
>
> > echo 'int main(){}' | gcc -S -x c -Wno-unknown-warnin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 19:34:11 2018
New Revision: 261648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86123
* match.pd ((X / Y) == 0 -> X < Y): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 19:30:58 2018
New Revision: 261647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/86123
* match.pd ((X / Y) == 0 -> X < Y): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 15 19:19:04 2018
New Revision: 261646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86169 unshare COW string when non-const data() called
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 15 19:01:39 2018
New Revision: 261644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261644&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86169 unshare COW string when non-const data() called
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 15 18:47:29 2018
New Revision: 261642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86169 unshare COW string when non-const data() called
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34484
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hjl.tools at gmail dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86170
Bug ID: 86170
Summary: New test case gcc.c-torture/compile/pr84195.c added in
r261633 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49194
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34484
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60160
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
That makes sense as well. Adding further logic to silence the warning or to
make the warning not become an error is what I think is a bad idea. I like
also your more explicit wording.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Tony E Lewis from comment #5)
> Thanks to all for all work on this.
>
> (Apologies if this isn't helpful but just in case it is...) I notice that
> the original Godbolt snippet ( https://godbolt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86169
Bug ID: 86169
Summary: .data() fails to unshare strings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86168
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Should be fixed at r261635
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86168
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 15 16:11:12 2018
New Revision: 261636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86168 fix ambiguous default constructor
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86168
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86155
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Jun 15 15:25:16 2018
New Revision: 261633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Force user provided warning and error messages to only occupy one line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86168
Bug ID: 86168
Summary: [9 regression] libstdc++ tests fail with error: call
of overloaded 'random_device()' is ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #57 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #56)
> I'd say any warning option with more than just a handful of pr's against it
> would benefit from having a meta-bug.
On second thought I think actually a meta-bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82013
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86167
Bug ID: 86167
Summary: allocation variable length character array in derived
type incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86166
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85703
--- Comment #6 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jun 15 14:03:00 2018
New Revision: 261631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85703
Backport from mainline
2018-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86139
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf,|arm-linux-gnueabihf
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85945
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85702
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jun 15 14:01:00 2018
New Revision: 261630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85702
Backport from mainline
2018-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86166
Bug ID: 86166
Summary: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:299 on
aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85701
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jun 15 13:59:14 2018
New Revision: 261629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/85701
Backport from mainline
2018-06
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44284&action=edit
gcc9-pr86093.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86155
RJE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is not about crossing or not crossing, but rather about EH predecessors
mixed with non-{EH,abnormal} edges or so.
Without the patch we have:
;; basic block 289, loop depth 0, count 0, probably never exec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
>
> --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > The problem is in cross-jumping, we have a landing pad with on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> The problem is in cross-jumping, we have a landing pad with one
> EDGE_CROSSING and some EH predecessor edges. The DF code treats the
> bb_has_eh_pred specially
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86094
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86095
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-* aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is in cross-jumping, we have a landing pad with one EDGE_CROSSING
and some EH predecessor edges. The DF code treats the bb_has_eh_pred specially
and creates artificial generation of the EH_RETURN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86163
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 86163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86165
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 86165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86165
Bug ID: 86165
Summary: std::regex crashes when matching long lines.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
Bug ID: 86164
Summary: std::regex crashes when matching long lines
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86163
Bug ID: 86163
Summary: std::regex crashes when matching long lines
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looking at csa dump in more detail, from the block with abnormal predecessor we
have a long series of quite short bbs ending with unconditional jumps, often
containing some call. The bb with abnormal predece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The IL seems to be still correct in *.csa dump, where we have:
(code_label/s 1755 2240 1758 246 1802 (nil) [1 uses])
(note 1758 1755 1756 246 [bb 246] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 1756 1758 1757 246 (set (reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86158
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
The dumps contains addresses of tree nodes streamed. I will work out how to
silence them.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86158
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80485
--- Comment #5 from Tony E Lewis ---
Thanks to all for all work on this.
(Apologies if this isn't helpful but just in case it is...) I notice that the
original Godbolt snippet ( https://godbolt.org/g/JnrZss ) has regressed from a
rejects-valid i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, lopezibanez at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
>
> --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
> What I'm suggesting is to add an o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
What I'm suggesting is to add an option to control this warning, which is
currently enabled by default. Then you can use -Wno-error or even -Wno- to
make it always a warning or completely disable it. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
Summary|[7/8/9 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86162
Bug ID: 86162
Summary: [6 Regression] ppc64le bootstrap fails with GCC 8
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86162
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86156
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Or a support library like gmp or mpfr or mpc is built for a different
architecture.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 15 07:25:13 2018
New Revision: 261620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-15 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/86076
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
99 matches
Mail list logo