https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86245
Bug ID: 86245
Summary: _GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT GLIBCXX_3.4.21 issues
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86210
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:07:21 2018
New Revision: 261811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86210
* c-common.c (check_nonnull_arg): Use fold_fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86210
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:08:14 2018
New Revision: 261812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86210
* c-common.c (check_nonnull_arg): Use fold_fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86210
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Regression fixed for 8.2+ so far by the above changes, for the enhancement see
above comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86225
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is a dup of an existing bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85634
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85634
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jun 20 16:54:44 2018
New Revision: 261814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/85634] Fix tsubst ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85634
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53109
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86225
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 85918, which changed state.
Bug 85918 Summary: Conversions to/from [unsigned] long long are not vectorized
for AVX512DQ target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85634
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85634
--- Comment #13 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jun 20 19:22:53 2018
New Revision: 261817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/85634] Fix tsubst ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jun 20 19:34:53 2018
New Revision: 261818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70966 make pmr::new_delete_resource() immortal
Construct th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70966
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Bug ID: 86246
Summary: Template dispatching error inside a template function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86247
Bug ID: 86247
Summary: warning on alloca within a loop overly restrictive for
constant loops
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86093
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 20 20:40:33 2018
New Revision: 261820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-06-15 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 20 20:41:12 2018
New Revision: 261821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-06-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248
Bug ID: 86248
Summary: LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link
failure
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248
--- Comment #1 from Bill Long ---
Possibly related to 44265.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86213
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jun 20 21:11:23 2018
New Revision: 261823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261823&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libgcc/:
PR libgcc/86213
* generic-morestack.c (all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57005
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|2013-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71765
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86213
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jun 20 21:57:44 2018
New Revision: 261826
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261826&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libgcc/:
PR libgcc/86213
* generic-morestack.c (all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
--- Comment #18 from David Blaikie ---
Thanks - looks like this got hashed out on the C++ reflector in favor of this
being invalid. The Clang bug has been re-opened to work on the fix there.
Thanks! Sorry for the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86213
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No problem, now that Richard raised it on the core reflector we should see the
implementation divergence fixed, which is a Good Thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86238
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86238
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Simplified further:
struct B { ~B() {} };
struct C : private virtual B {};
struct D : C {} d;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86249
Bug ID: 86249
Summary: declaration conflicts with target of using declaration
already in scope
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86250
Bug ID: 86250
Summary: addition of default argument on redeclaration makes
this constructor a default constructor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86251
Bug ID: 86251
Summary: legal or illegal code?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86252
Bug ID: 86252
Summary: Abstract class in function return type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86253
Bug ID: 86253
Summary: N3639 array of runtime bound
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86254
Bug ID: 86254
Summary: g++ rejects legal code?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86255
Bug ID: 86255
Summary: addition of default argument on redeclaration makes
this constructor a default constructor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86256
Bug ID: 86256
Summary: Lambda will not add ref count for class intelligent
pointer member when capture 'this' or & as argument
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257
Bug ID: 86257
Summary: Program compiled with fPIC crashes while stepping over
thread-local variable GDB
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86258
Bug ID: 86258
Summary: Program compiled with fPIC crashes while stepping over
thread-local variable GDB
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86198
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jun 21 05:42:53 2018
New Revision: 261832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libbacktrace/
2018-06-21 Denis Khalikov
PR other/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
Bug ID: 86259
Summary: min(4, strlen(s)) optimized to strlen(s) with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto, wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This code is undefined. Try -fno-strict-aliasing .
But that might not even cause the undefined code to be resolved to bring
defined as you are accessing outside the bounds of an array.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note gcc thinks strlen(s) is less than or equal to 3 as s is really T.s which
is an array of 4 in size and there for the last element has to be a null char.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 44306
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44306&action=edit
Patch for comment #6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This code is undefined.
What's the problem? Might be just a bad reduction. Original code is Xorg:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/xkb/XKBGAl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note gcc thinks strlen(s) is less than or equal to 3 as s is really T.s
> which is an array of 4 in size and there for the last element has to be a
> null ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71484
Olivier Kannengieser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||okannen at gmail dot com
--- Comm
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo